True Health Care Reform Requires Campaign Finance Reform


Posted on 07 December 2009

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

By Zenei Cortez
California Nurses Association

One important lesson we can learn from the year long debate on healthcare reform is that big special interest money is still corrupting our political process and our democracy.

Lost amid the clamor over public option and cost was all the money flying around behind the scenes. Over the first nine months of this year, the nation's top 13 private health insurers and their trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) spent nearly $23  million  in federal lobbying to tilt reform in their direction. 

Following passage of the House bill, the same analysts for the Public Campaign Action found that House members voting against the bill received, on average, 24 percent more in campaign money than those who voted for it.

Their goal,  to maintain the status quo of a shattered system that pads insurers'  profits, or to at least steer the federal legislation to limit restrictions on abusive insurance practices while assuring they line up millions of new customers.

Is it any wonder that even with a number of positive reforms in the recent House bill in particular, most notably expansion of Medicaid, reduced pharmaceutical costs for seniors, and increased public health programs, that insurance companies still would come out ahead with billions of dollars in added revenues from the new mandate requiring people to buy private insurance and few restraints on insurance pricing practices?

In California, the trend is the same, as drug companies, the insurance industry, HMOs, hospitals, and nursing homes have contributed over $280 million to candidates and initiatives since 2000, distorting public policy to their gain and to the detriment of patients.

Nurses have an up-close view of what health industry profiteering means for our families. On a daily basis, we see people forced to seek care in emergency rooms because they can’t afford insurance  or skip doctor's visits due to high out-of-pocket costs. We see those suffering from chronic conditions because they can’t pay for the medicines their doctors ordered. We’re tired of having the insurance industry come between us and the care our patients need.  

The political influence wielded by insurers, symbolized by their lobbying expenditures and campaign donations,  has prevented more sweeping reform, such as expanding and updating Medicare to cover all Americans, a change that would break the industry's stranglehold on our health care and encourage more effective  efforts to contain costs and improve outcomes.  

It's not just the insurers, of course. Pharmaceutical firms, hospital chains, medical suppliers, biotech firms, and other wealthy healthcare corporations have made the healthcare industry the leading spender in federal lobbying the past decade. 

Broader  health care reform may remain elusive until elected officials begin representing voters, not industry lobbyists. That’s why California voters should help lay the foundation for reform by passing the California Fair Elections Act on the June 2010 ballot.

Authored by Sen. Loni Hancock, D-Oakland, and signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the measure asks voters to establish a voluntary pilot project for California's secretary of state races in 2014 and 2018 allowing candidates to qualify for public financing of their campaigns if they demonstrate a broad base of support and agree to strict spending prohibitions. The pilot program would be funded primarily by fees on lobbyists, lobbying firms and lobbyist employers, with no taxpayer dollars going to candidates.  
 
A recent statewide survey shows likely voters favor adopting the CFEA’s pilot program for Secretary of State elections by a nearly three-to-one ratio, with 63% in favor and strong support from voters of every party and every geographic region of the state.  

Healthcare is only one of many important arenas of public policy poorly served by the intrusive interest of the wealthiest interests. From energy to environmental protections to workplace safety to other public benefits, our political system is clearly broken and in need of reforms that would more likely come if the corrupting role of money in politics was abated.

It's long past time to reclaim our electoral process so that our officials serve voters, not the biggest industry donors. Californians are poised to help start that movement by voting for the California Fair Elections Act in June 2010 elections.  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Zenei Cortez, RN is co-president of the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, one of the nation’s premiere nurses’ organizations and health care unions.

First of all, this isn't about campaign finances - it never was. It's far more involved than just that. Even were we to decide to tax ourselves again - something no incumbent politician would ever complain about - do you seriously think it would make a difference?

We have federal campaign financing. President Obama was consistent in his support of it throughout his political career - until he had the opportunity to use it. Then he declined.

You see, we can't keep MONEY out of political speech. Oh, the internet is somewhat of an equalizer when it comes to the effects of money and advertising, but it doesn't really replace paid people working for you. There is a whole advertising and PR industry that exists because they CAN affect events, and the one with the most money is always going to have more of those people. More billboards, more signs, more name recognition. These advantages are real - but not insurmountable. We aren't going to be able to prohibit this in any event. Political speech is one of the highest forms of protected speech under the US Constitution. You aren't going to be able to tell the rich person to NOT tell people to vote for Joe Smith, and you aren't going to be able to penalize Joe Smith when the rich person does, either.

The real advantage, however, is incumbency. That's where the corruption starts. That's where the serious money goes to those who can divert a portion of the incredible amount of tax money that flows in to Sacramento to the supporter. It isn't just campaign funds - it's all sorts of perks and pleasures and seats on boards where you (or your spouse or kids) get paid a lot and do very little. Remember when Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas and Hillary Clinton, a person with no business knowledge whatsoever, was 'coincidentally' picked for a lucrative job on the Wal-Mart board of Directors?

Incumbent politicians get supported in a variety of ways - not just with campaign contributions. And the Supreme Court and the US Constitution makes it almost impossible for you to stop that money at the supplier. We could, of course, stop it at the recipient.

All we would have to do is force legislators to recuse themselves from any vote in which they - or any of their immediate family - had a financial interest. Or prohibit them from taking ANY other compensation while working for the public as an elected representative and have them forfeit their pensions if they work for a company they have helped within five years of retirement.

The real problem - it would appear - is that we have the best representatives that money can buy.

People seek chiropractic care primarily for pain conditions such as back pain, neck pain, and headache.
Regards,
West Los Angeles Chiropractic

Thanks in advance for your cooperation with the above conditions. I hope you find it useful.It helped me with ocean of knowledge so I really believe you will do much better in the future I appreciate everything you have added to my knowledge base.Chiropractors often counsel patients about health concepts such as nutrition, exercise, changes in lifestyle, and stress management, but chiropractors do not prescribe drugs or perform surgery. In general, if multiple resources recommend the same chiropractor, chances are good that the chiropractor is reliable.
Regards,
chiropractic

The chiropractor positions the patient on his or her side,then applies a quick and precise manipulative thrust to the misaligned vertebra,returning it to its proper position.
Regards,
Santa Monica Chiropractor

Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck!
Mortgage interest rates

I like this concept. I visited your blog for the first time and just been your fan. Keep posting as I am gonna come to read it everyday!!
Milestone Search | Milestone Search | Milestone Search | Milestone Search

Sign up to Receive Daily or Weekly Digests from CPR!
Email:

Kamala Harris addresses the CA Democratic Convention

Breaking News