After Massacre, Afghan Americans Question Meaning of Justice


Posted on 17 March 2012

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend by emailSend by email

By Peter Schurmann
New America Media

The killing of 16 civilians – mostly women and children – by a lone American soldier in Kandahar Province last week has darkened an increasingly ominous cloud hanging over America’s mission in Afghanistan. In its wake, many are asking what sort of justice should be meted out.

For members of the Afghan American community here, the question goes beyond this single tragedy; it has implications for the larger war effort and the future of their homeland.

“Afghans are people of revenge,” says Farid Younos, professor of human development studies at California State University East Bay. “The Qur'an burning was a very serious issue,” he says, “but that is an incident that can be gradually forgotten. Urinating and killing call for revenge.”

A video released in January showed several American soldiers urinating on what appeared to be the corpses of Taliban fighters. That was followed last month by reports of burnings of the Muslim holy book by U.S. forces, which triggered massive and violent protests across Afghanistan.

Taliban spokesmen, meanwhile, have called off proposed talks with U.S. officials in the wake of this week’s massacre, carried out by a 38-year-old sergeant from Washington who was on his first tour of Afghanistan after serving three tours in Iraq. There have also been reports that the Taliban threatened to behead American soldiers.

The underlying question for many Afghan Americans is: How can the U.S. convey to ordinary Afghans that its presence in the country is just?

“If Americans do not change their strategy, the stigma as occupiers gets stronger,” explains Younos, who says more effort should be put into creating jobs and bolstering education.

Humaira Ghilzai, co-founder of Afghan Friends Network and the Hayward-Ghazni Sister City Committee in Hayward, has spent the past six years working to bring education to the women of Ghazni, located some 70 miles southeast of Kabul. Her privately funded project has helped establish several schools in the city that work to fill in the educational gaps left by years of war.

“There is much bridge building that needs to be done,” Ghilzai says, “especially with the locals in the areas affected, the families of victims and direct communication through Afghan media to the Afghan people.” Messages of condolence from the White House and from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Ghilzai says, do not reach those on the ground who are disconnected from the halls of power but knee-deep in the violence.

“We need American diplomats on Afghan TV, not VOA (Voice of America),” she explains. “I was really pleased that President Obama, Secretary Clinton and Leon Panetta made their apologies and contacted their peers… but the people who are directly impacted by this do not feel any consolation from such high-level communication.”

Such individuals include Abdul Samad, a resident of the village of Panjwai, where the killing occurred, claiming 11 of his family members. A one-time supporter of the American war effort, Samad was quoted in the New York Times urging their withdrawal during a phone call with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who called to offer his condolences.

“We made you president, and what happens to our family?” demands Samad. “The Americans kill us and then burn the dead bodies.” The answer, he says is to, “Either finish us or get rid of the Americans.”

This sentiment sends shivers through many in the local Afghan American community, who fear a resurgent Taliban and an end to some of the promising gains made, especially in the arena of women’s rights.

“The soldier was mentally sick and what he did was awful,” admits journalist and author Fariba Nawa, whose recent book “Opium Nation” focused on the impact of Afghanistan’s drug trade on women. “But the Taliban and Pakistan are responsible for killing more civilians than the foreign powers.”

For ordinary Afghans, her comments go directly to the plight of a nation caught in the snares of contending powers, both foreign and domestic. Malalai Joya, an activist and former member of parliament in Afghanistan, argues such violence fuels the presence of “misogynist Taliban” and “Jehadi warlords” across the country and in the government.

Joya, who was dismissed from parliament in 2007 after accusing Karzai’s government of employing known warlords, is adamant in her belief that America’s presence brings only “destruction, destitution and death.”

It is a view that conflicts with those, like Nawa and Ghilzai, who fear this one event could undo a decade of albeit halting progress.

“As an American,” says Ghilzai, “I hope that we don't give up on Afghanistan and throw away all the work of good people both Afghan and American with a short sighted decision.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter Schurmann is an editor/reporter with New America Media, where this article also appeared.

A bit over a year ago there was a piece written on this site entitled "California's Great Recession and the Costs of War" that details how much our state's taxpayers spend on the Afghanistan war (and Iraq) and what that money could do if we spent it here.

Worth a read...because its just as true now as then...here's a clip: "For eight long years – twice the time it took the US to defeat the Axis Powers in World War II – the war in Afghanistan has drained our nation’s resources at a time we have none to spare. America has spent over $250 billion on this war since 2001 – with California taxpayers picking up $37.9 billion of that tab.

The National Priorities Project (NPP) - a nonpartisan non-profit that analyzes how our tax dollars are spent - estimates that once the additional 30,000 troops are included America will spend over $100 billion on the war this year alone. Meanwhile, California has gone from contributing an annual low of $1.8 billion in 2004, to $7 billion last year, to an estimated $9.2 billion in 2010.

Alternatives to War Spending

Consider these stark examples of misplaced priorities: The cost of 1 soldier for 1 year in Afghanistan is $1 million; while the cost of college tuition at a California State University is $9,285. The cost of a single anti-tank missile in Afghanistan is $85,000; while the cost of providing 1 year of college books and supplies is $1,608 (average fees). And the cost of 1 predator drone in Afghanistan is $4.5 million; while 1 full Pell Grant for a college student in California is $5,350.

Or imagine if the $37.9 billion California contributed to the war had been spent on expanding health care, improving education, or increasing our energy independence? According to NPP - for one year – we could have provided funding for any one of the following:

• 15.6 million people with health care;
• 5.7 million scholarships and 7 million Pell Grants for university students;
• 4.5 million Head Start placements for children;
• 500,000 new elementary school teachers;
• 676,649 public safety officers;
• 535,058 music and arts teachers;
• 113,373 affordable housing units;
• And 67.4 million homes with renewable electricity.

Every California city tells its own story of misused taxpayer dollars. San Francisco has contributed $1 billion to the war in Afghanistan – enough to provide 3,023 affordable housing units and 8,042 public safety officers. Los Angeles contributed $3.2 billion - enough to provide 1.2 million children with health care.

But instead of embracing fiscal sanity, we are doubling down on fiscal madness. According to a Congressional Budget Office estimate, over the next ten years the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars could total $2.4 trillion, or nearly $8,000 per American man, woman and child."

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/california%E2%80%99s-great-...

Progressive Democrats of America has an action alert supporting two bills to get out of Afghanistan quicker. Here's a clip and the link:

Now Osama bin Laden is dead. We have gotten our pound of flesh. Vengeance has been served, albeit as a very cold course. Now is the time that not one of our politicians can argue a legitimate reason for our staying in Afghanistan. We've done what we went there to do. Now is when we need to tell our representatives that they must cosponsor Rep. Barbara Lee's HR 780, the Responsible End to the War in Afghanistan Act. The heroes got the bad guy; roll the credits and send the troops home.

HR 780 ensures that our withdrawal from Afghanistan will be swift, because it restricts tax money made available for the armed forces in Afghanistan to their safe and orderly withdrawal—including all Department of Defense contractors.

Tell our representatives that we need to honor the terms of the Afghanistan invasion 9-1/2 years ago. Bin Laden is dead. Mission finally accomplished

http://hq-salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/1987/p/dia/action/public/index.sjs?acti...