Budget Burdens from DC to Sacramento
By Anthony Wright
Health Access
ASSEMBLY BUDGET COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE BIG PICTURE: Budget Chair Noreen Evans (D) led committee members Wednesday in a sharply focused Q-and-A with State Controller John Chiang, Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor and representatives with the state Department of Finance.
Not since July 12, 2007, has California actually had cash on hand, Chiang said. Since that date, the Department of Finance has relied on "external borrowing and internal borrowing" from various special funds. In answer to lawmaker's queries, the controller said the state's finance department has identified 710 of the state's 1,000-plus special funds from which it can borrow internally.
Repeatedly, Chiang told legislators that California "needs credible and sustainable budget solutions" that do not include past-year gimmicks such as proposing to sell off the state compensation fund, or EdFund (the state's guarantor of student loans) or the state Lottery -- all of which were said by the administration to be worth far more money than they actually were, and attracted no buyers anyway.
Chiang was firm in telling the budget committee that members needed to make "tough choices" to buck up the state's economic and educational future, as well as to ensure its quality of life does not decline sharply. "We've lost 1 million jobs.... We need to decide what kind of state do we plan to have -- and if we are going to fund essential services, we really need to address the question of revenue."
Both Republicans and Democrats made remarks indicating they've had enough of cutting state services for taxpayers, the disabled, the elderly, and K-12 students as well as university-bound students. Assemblyman Jim Silva (R) said as a teacher he is tired of "seeing students are getting short-changed. I get my back up with I hear that California students are at a disadvantage in getting university educations."
Assemblywoman Diane Harkey (R) noted that she only joined the Legislature about a year ago, but already she'd been through three cycles of closing budget deficits. "We're not just in a budget problem. We are overloaded with debt." Others, including Democrats Jerry Hill and Robert Blumenfield, pointed out that some of the harsh health care service cuts that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is championing will cost the state more money in the long-run as people seek care in emergency rooms or long-term care facilities.
Chiang said Wall Street financial experts do not consider the governor's demand for $6.9 billion from the federal government an intelligent answer to California's perennial deficit woes. "When the governor issued his '6.9 billion solution,' it was not viewed as a totally credible solution, leading Standard&Poors to downgrade California's rating from A to A-."
"We're going to have to educate our students for new economies," Chiang said, "Your actions can make the difference in setting this generation on the right fiscal path. For too long, when people don't make tough choices, students, the aged, disabled and taxpayers all end up suffering."
Evans, the committee chair, said sub-committees will begin meeting next week to scrutinize details of the governor's budget proposal. Regarding an unprecedented Department of Finance letter requesting blanket authority to defer payments to various state creditors, Evans said "I will clean up my language from what I said when I first saw this request for the Department to have legislative authority. I'm extremely skeptical and I suggest you come back with an actual plan."
Vice Chair Jim Nielsen (R) joined Republican colleagues in attempting to distance himself from the administration's request for open-ended authority to defer payments. "This is a breath-taking application," Nielsen said. "To just ask us to give you a blank check ... we can't afford that anymore."
PRESIDENT OBAMA PUTS FORWARD FEDERAL BUDGET PROPOSAL: Earlier this week, President Barack Obama released his proposed federal budget. The proposal attempts to balance short-term economic stimulus with long-term efforts at deficit reduction. In attempting to reducing the deficit by $1.25 trillion over 10 years, the proposal lets the Bush-era tax cuts expire, and prioritizes the passage of pending health reforms in Congress.
To deal with the immediate recession, the budget proposes a variety of provisions, such as continuing COBRA subsidies to help the unemployed purchase health coverage. It would also extend enhanced Medicaid federal matching funds from the stimulus for six additional months to states, providing $25.5 billion nationally, and at least $1.5 billion to California in the budget year through June 2011.
The Office and Management and Budget has a specific fact sheet on the federal budget and California. Health Access has more about the federal budget on our blog.
CUTS PROPOSED AT TIME OF GROWING NEEDS: The cyclical, seemingly never-ending state budget grind has Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger stuck in a rut, still swinging away with an ax at the safety net at the time it is needed most. That's the basic message that comes through from a report released Tuesday by the California Budget Project.
California has lost 1,000,000 jobs since the start of the recession, the report says. People need help, families need help, whole communities need help as they scramble against the tide of economic devastation. Cuts, the CBP says, will only further weaken the economy and could impede the national recovery.
The CBP report says that 100 prominent economists of all ideologies recently warned that,"It is economically preferable to raise taxes on those with high incomes than to cut state expenditures [during a recession] ... Steep state budget cuts will exacerbate the economic downturn."
The report noted that California now has 3.6 million more working-age individuals than 10 years ago, but is now down to approximately the same number of jobs as 10 years ago. More than one in five working-age Californians -- or 21.4 percent -- were either unemployed or underemployed in December 2009. (The calculation includes 354,000 jobless people who want and are able to work, but who are left uncounted in official statistics because they have not searched for work in the last month.)
As need grew, California unfortunately responded by cutting off programs -- suspending enrollment in Healthy Families, for example, even though the number of children whose low-income families bought coverage through the program increased steadily by nearly 100,000 kids from July 2007 to July 2009, the report says. To read it and view helpful charts and graphics, go to www.cbp.org.
SINGLE-PAYER, OTHER LEGISLATION STARTS TO MOVE AGAIN: With the new year, bills are starting to move again, including SB 810, the single-payer health reform bill authored by Democratic Senator Mark Leno of San Francisco. That bill looks to be headed to the Governor's desk again this year. It's onto the Assembly after passing the Senate last week, the last week a bill was eligible to pass out of its house of origin.
While it still faces the barriers of a two-thirds vote for financing, and a probable gubernatorial veto regardless, it does keep a broad range of health reform options in the policy conversation, and highlights the deteriorating status quo of our health system. If anything, some advocates hope it will provide a lesson from state legislatures to their federal counterparts, that they should not quit just because of a setback.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anthony Wright is Executive Director of Health Access California, a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has been re-published from the Health Access Blog.
- kaldveer's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend


We know that Jewelers have always been associated with women. Irrespective of age, girls love to adorn themselves with bright and glittering jewels. Earrings are one of those items that are widely used by women of all ages.links of london
links of london sale
Mothers like to adorn their little girls with pretty and fashionable earrings. Teenage girls love to wear funky and stylish earrings. Brides are incomplete without jewels especially earrings that make them more charming and glamorous. Women love to wear trendy and expensive earrings of gold,
links of london jewelry
links of london sweetie bracelet
links of london charms silver and other metals with diamonds and lovely stones embedded in them.
louboutin knockoffsThe Ritz line offers abercrombie clothessmall clutch bags Tiffany Jewelry on salecovered entirely with Swarovski Crystalsclassic tall boots. Because they comejerseys wholesale in a range of styles - from classic designs hocky Jerseysto contemporary fashion statementsJimmy Choo Shoes - they work for a range of womenAlexander McQueen Shoes. They run from $700 to $750Abercrombie Women Sweater. These classic bags Abercrombie Men Poloscome in solid colorsTiffany & Co. Earrings that let the design Tiffany & Co. Money Clipsand crystals shineUGG Australia Womens Metallic. The contemporary bags UGG Australia Women's Sandraalso feature crystalsUGG Australia Adirondack, but they are used to createAbercrombie Women Hoodies modern symbols such as a handgunUGG Australia Ultra Tall, skull and crossbonesHandbags Designer, and an anchorLeather Handbags. All of the Ritz bags closePrada Handbags with a crystal encrustedDolce & Gabbana handbags, gold-toned push-lockChristian Dior handbags. The bags are lined in supple leatherJimmy Choo handbags and most have a detachable shoulder chainMiu Miu handbags. All bags from this collection come with a plushVersace handbags , drawstring bag for storagecheap shoes. They measure about 5 inches wide by 3 inches high and 1inches deep.
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Bag-White 201292
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Handbag-Black 163805
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Satchel Bag-Apricot&Red
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Shopping Bag-Silver
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Shopping Bag-Apricot 181491
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Shopping Bag-Apricot 181491
Air Force One Shoes
Air Jordan Shoes
Air Max Shoes
Air Yeezy Shoes
Air Dunk Shoes
Air Shox Shoes
Air Force One Canvas Women
Air Force One Canvas Men
Air Force One High Women
Air Force One High Men
Air Force One Low Men
Air Force One Low Women
Air Force One New Styles
Nike Air Max 2003 Women
Nike Air Max 2003 Men
Nike Air Max 2009 Men
Nike Air Max 2009 Women
Nike Air Max 90 Men
Nike Air Max 90 Women
Nike Air Max 95 Men
Nike Air Max CLASSIC BW Men
Nike Air Max CLASSIC BW Women
Nike Air Max CLASSIC BW Kid
Air Yeezy Men
Air Yeezy Women
Nike Dunk High Kid
Nike Dunk Low Kid
Nike Dunk High Men
Nike Dunk High Women
Nike Dunk Low Men
Nike Shox Shoes
Nike Shox NZ Men
Nike Shox NZ Women
Nike Shox OZ Men
Nike Shox OZ Women
Nike Shox R2 Men
Nike Shox R2 Women
Nike Shox R4 Men
Nike Shox R3 Men
Nike Shox R4 New Women
Nike Shox R4 New Men
Nike Shox R4 Women
Nike Shox R6 Men
Nike Dunk Low Men
Air Force One New Styles
Is that businesses and the wealthy are fleeing California. When you talk about a million jobs being lost since the start of the recession, you need to realize that many of those jobs are PERMANENTLY lost. Oh, they may come back - but not in California. They'll be re-established as the economy improves in some state with lower cost of doing business and a more business friendly environment.
As numerous states have found out, soaking it to the rich doesn't work real well. They are - by their very wealth - effectively more mobile than the rest of us. Sure, the guy (or company) who owns a few thousand acres of agricultural land in Salinas might not be very mobile, but excepting high overhead industrial operations (of which the now-defunct NUMMI was one of the few remaining) there is really no reason to stick around California when you can find cheaper labor, less intrusive regulation, and just a better overall business environment.
What does that leave us with? 37 million people - about 12% of the US population - but about one-third of the people in the US on welfare.
The problem is we have a high tax - high benefit model, but the high tax RATES are in fact NOT producing high taxes.
It sounds very alarming when politicians say that they have to cut services to the disabled, the poor and K-12 and the university. It doesn't help when the recipients of state money all cry that they "have cut to the bone." It sounds criminal; but it's not true. There is lots of "fat" in all state programs: e.g., excessive salaries; administrative overhead; travel and other perks; unnecessary and archaic governmental bodies (the Governor's 2004 "CPR" study found over $39 bilion in potential savings by eliminating the county offices of education--over $4 billion-- and many other boards and commissions many of which are last place of refuge for termed-out pols.)