Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times

picdan.jpgBy Dan Aiello
California Progress Report

Amidst the public budget hearings and closed door sessions last week the California Health Policy Forum highlighted the Department of Health and Human Services' continuing work on the plan to end California’s epidemic obesity.

Key among the presented issues: How to fund future efforts of the long-term directive that had been passed in better economic times.

The forum, “Tackling Obesity, Crossing Silos to Find Solutions,” addressed nutrition, physical activity, community planning and physical environment directives of the California Obesity Prevention Plan (COPP), that was passed with bipartisan support and funded in the Budget Act of 2005 (SB77, Item: 4260-001-0001) to address California’s obesity epidemic.

No Single Cause, No Single Cure

The Department of Health and Human Services Agency estimates the 37 million residents of California have gained 360 million pounds in the last decade, a rate believed to be the fastest in the nation.

California is not alone. Like much of the rest of the world, the golden state is experiencing an obesity epidemic for which there is no single cause or simple cure.

Currently, poor nutrition and inactivity are causing serious health problems for state residents once known for their active lifestyle and healthy eating choices. Health issues like Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancer are on a persistent rise, according to the DHHS.

But according to presenters, including representatives from the Center for Health Improvement, the University of California, Davis, California Convergence and the California Department of Public Health’s office for obesity prevention and center for physical activity, as California leads in obesity rates, it also leads in discovery of the multitude of environmental issues complicit in the phenomenon.

The initiative “A Vision for California: 10 Steps Toward Healthy Living,” is a strategy to change not only Californian’s eating and exercise habits, but their communities and lifestyle choices, as well.

But can the bold goals of this long-term plan outlast the reality of the current budget shortfall?

“It’s so critical right now, things are happening quickly,” said Julie Williamson, MPH, Director of California Convergence, referring both to state budget negotiations and the federal stimulus allocations. “Decisions are being made and the more we understand the more you understand how much our environment influences our health and how much that is going to save us down the road,”

Williamson cited the state’s success with reducing healthcare costs from its investment in smoking reduction programs as justification for funding current anti-obesity efforts. “The savings alone from the reduction in lung cancer and all of the cardiovascular disease associated with smoking is vast in California,” said Williamson. “It’s amazing in what a short amount of time we have seen concrete results … the diseases associated with tobacco, which I thought I’d never see [reduced] in my lifetime, these are long term results, but we are actually seeing those results now … so I think we can not afford not to do prevention.”

Of the “Dozen policy priorities that we wanted to go forward with,” Williamson said her agency will now reduce its program initiatives to just three over the next 18 months: Joint Use, Healthy Food Retail, “especially for low-income and disenfranchised neighborhoods,” and free access to potable water in every community.

“Every person should have free access to free potable water,” said Williamson. “We don’t have that in California. I think that we have an imperative to start with at least water to make sure every child, every adult, has access to free water.”

Lisa Cirill, acting chief of the California Center for Physical Activity, within the CDPH, also sees funding opportunity for the state’s physical activity initiative in the federal economic stimulus act.

“We do have a lot of opportunities at the federal level,” explained Cirill. “For physical activity, the surface transportation is our farm bill.” Cirill sees the infrastructure-targeted funds as ideal for building “pedestrian facilities, access to transit and safe routes to school.” Cirill also sees energy efficiency and conservation funds going toward improving pedestrian, public transit and transit access, to “reduce miles traveled by getting people out of their cars.”

“I think at this point we’re being forced to think big and to think structurally about how California as a state functions, and how our communities at the local level function; how our basic systems and structures of society interact with each other and, if we bring that understanding, I think we can really pull through this whole economic crisis in a way that’s going to put us on a much healthier path then we’ve been for many, many decades,” said Williamson. “I think there is real opportunity here.”

Cirill believes the $22 billion allotted for school construction and modernization funds in the state fiscal stabilization funds and Community Development Block Grants could be well-spent promoting joint use of community schools, which she said were once “the center and pride” of communities, but in the last several decades have been built on the outskirts of towns, making them inaccessible or unsafe to walk or bicycle to. Joint use, including recreation and community centers on school property, safe pedestrian access from school to home and school to school, farmer’s markets and healthy food retail access, can combine to increase “incidental physical activity,” while reducing pollution.

According to Cirill, construction of suburban California by architects and developers who threw out historic neighborhoods with corner stores and schools as the center of recreational activity and community gatherings, created a new California lifestyle of sedentary, automobile-centric living. Wide roads, unsafe for pedestrians, and miles of homes without enough parks or retail opportunities within walking distance have left Californians little choice but to abandon historically healthy habits for unhealthy alternatives designed for them by poor urban planning and community design.

“We know the reasons” for reduced physical activity, said Cirill. “Reduced recess, not enough activity in schools, lack of p.e. and just the way our communities are built, not allowing for active transport.”

The strategy of simply “promoting exercise as individual behavior … has not worked,” Cirill explained, saying the effort had “flat lined.” Cirill said that from gaining that knowledge, California subsequently learned “that environmental change and social organization change is crucial,” to increasing activity and reducing weight.

“We need to definitely address just the basics, like walking around the community. We’re not doing it because we have poor development. We have urban sprawl, we’re building our communities and what happened is ‘loops and lollipops.’ Johnny is living in the cul-de-sac. He can’t get to his friend, Tommy [a short distance as the crow flies but a long distance because of the lack of intersections], and there isn’t even an amenity, I don’t see a school, I don’t see any retail in the area. So they’re going to stay home and be isolated or ask their mom to drive them over because it’s not safe.”

“This is why we have our children are sitting inside,” said Cirill.

Lack of pedestrian safety is another issue. “Our public health data shows that our pedestrian injury rate is significant, the third leading cause of injury or death in ages 1 through 12,” Cirill claimed.

Lunch Lady Lessons

Gail Feenstra, a food system analyst with the University of California, Davis, sustainable agriculture research and education program, addressed improving nutrition in schools by empowering “the most under-appreciated and under-paid” school employees, cafeteria staff through the Farm to Schools program.

By introducing staff to local produce farmers and “freeing the reins” of staff to “bring what they already have” to cooking their own ethnic meals (which brings pride and encouragement to kitchen staff,) school lunches improve, even without an increase in per meal costs. Feenstra explained that the end result is a student inclined to prefer healthier food, using a City of Davis middle school salad bar, as an example. When the students graduated and went on to the high school, which lacked a salad bar, Feenstra said, “the students complained. They wanted their salad bar,” which eventually was added at the high school level.

National Guidelines

Presenters also provided the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2008 activity guidelines for American Adults as well as the supplemental guide, "Be Active Your Way."

Posted on July 03, 2009

Comments

In the 1940s and 1050s it was safe for 10 year old children to be outdoors and away from home. And there was room to roam. During the summer, children in Glendale would ride their bikes a mile or more to Brand Park to hike in the Verdugo hills all day, or to Verdugo Plunge to go swimming. Children walked to grammar school. Children in West Covina would go hiking all day, or roam through the walnut, orange and lemon groves. Families would vacation and hike in the Sierra.
The massive influx of third world immigrants (courtesy of Ted Kennedy and other liberals, abetted by greedy republicans) resulted in development that reduced the room to roam, created crime that led mothers to keep their 10 year old children home, turned Yosemite into Grand Central Station, made hiking in the Sierra a life threatening adventure because of marijuana growers, and destroyed the economic and social viability of the state.
California used to be a great state.

Posted by: Erik Kengaard at July 3, 2009 09:41 AM

The influx of immigrants to California, mostly from other states, btw, and not the "third world," is the result of an economic model designed on expansion and development and reliant upon high density. In part, smaller housing lots are by local government design, the result of the heavy cost of infrastructure maintenance and need to support multiple retail outlets to generate sufficient tax revenue. Prop 13, while cutting property taxes for homeowners, subsequently created the need for local government to generate massive retail tax base revenue, and the "crowding" that ensued is not an immigration issue, at all, but instead a result of cities and towns desperately seeking to cut maintenance costs of neighborhoods while generating revenue through high density housing and commercial development within its borders.

Suburban growth, especially in Southern California where natural resources cannot sustain it, continues with this model unabated, disregarding the lack of water and ignoring its finite quantity that can be requisitioned from the north. Southern California desert districts, like Hollingsworth's, pay no heed to water when approving ever more housing development, convinced that by metering northerner's water consumption, their development model can continue without end. It's time to focus on infill development and european economic models that don't rely on ever-increasing populations and in no way should Dems go along with the governor's plans to sell off state-owned land resources for even more development. Once it's sold, and once it's built, it's gone forever.

Posted by: Terran at July 3, 2009 10:09 AM

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/issues/us-population.html
1990-2000
"The dream of a stabilized — or even a stabilizing — population was proven to be nothing but a fairy tale as U.S. population exploded with its biggest growth ever. . . because Congress further increased immigration to a level almost quadruple the traditional level."

Posted by: Erik Kengaard at July 3, 2009 08:07 PM

why wont the state pay for the lap band and sorts in the long run it would pay for itself

Posted by: donnamiddleton at July 6, 2009 07:10 PM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker