Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Governor Proposals Sweeping Cuts To Health and Human Service Programs
By Marty D. Omoto
Director/Organizer
California Disability Community Action Network
The Governor in recent days and weeks has made new proposals calling for program reforms – that would result in a corresponding reduction in spending in those programs – impacting several health and human service programs, including CalWORKS – the state’s welfare to work program that serves over 500,000 persons – including thousands who are children and adults with special needs, and to In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS).
There has been continued talk about similar program reforms – tied to budget reductions – for other health and human service programs including developmental services (regional centers that fund community-based services for over 240,000 children and adults with developmental disabilities).
The Governor’ latest proposal for further cuts to state employee wages - which if he implements through a 4th mandatory unpaid furlough day or if the Legislature takes action to approve it, would mean a cut in pay for state employees that will total nearly 20% at least through June 30, 2010 (the end of the 2009-2010 State budget year that began July 1).
And while nothing is ever clear in budget negotiations – it does seem apparent that Legislative Democrats – who control the Assembly and State Senate, but need a handful of Republican votes to pass a revised budget plan to take effect immediately – may be the ones facing the difficult choices of what to save and what to give up.
As of last week, Legislative Democrats withdrew their proposal for $2 billion in new tax increases (oil severance and cigarette taxes) in light of the intense opposition from the Governor and Legislative Republicans.
That means the Democratic revised budget plan – as passed out of the Budget Conference Committee and passed by only Democratic votes in the Assembly and Senate in late June will fall at least $5 billion short of closing the over $26 billion budget shortfall, adding in the increased amount of the deficit. And that plan had already contained the same exact proposals to cut developmental services (including regional centers) by over $400 million in state general fund money, exactly proposed by the Governor, and other proposals by the Governor that they rejected but included their own modified versions that still called for significant cuts to In-Home Supportive Services, a fourth consecutive cut to SSI/SSP grants, cuts to Adult Day Health, Medi-Cal and more.
And California faces yet another budget hole on top of what we face now - that could be over $15 billion for the 2010-2011 State Budget year that begins next July – the Governor will propose his budget for that year – with expected major cuts – on January 10th. It is possible – perhaps likely – that another special session will be called in the fall sometime to deal with the continuing budget crisis, no matter how this present budget crisis now is resolved.
Oh, and the state is just a week or two away from running completely out of cash (meaning it won’t have the money to pay the bills that it cannot by state, federal or court decisions pay with IOUs).
And what that means is Legislative Democrats, especially if they maintain their stance on withdrawing their proposal to raise new taxes, are facing the prospect of what to fight back on and what they have to give up or offer a compromise on. Virtually all the cuts and proposals the Governor has made in recent days and weeks impacts in particular many traditional Democratic constituencies. The Governor is termed out, and Legislative Republicans have figured that their hard-line stance – as awful as it may look to many advocates and groups outside the Capitol – nearly always gives them more spending cuts or some policy change that they didn’t have before – and, with the exception of the budget passed in February – without giving in on raising new taxes or other revenues. In other words – they know eventually Legislative Democrats will give in on something.
The recent proposal to cut state employee pay is a good example. Cuts and reforms to CalWORKS, In-Home Supportive Services and other health and human service programs is another. More cuts to education. (though the Governor seems to be backing off from slightly is the proposed suspension of Proposition 98 – the education funding guarantee.
That isn’t to say that this is good government or the way things should work.
And it is always possible that a miracle – through an accounting slight of hand or some other similar religious event – could happen and resolve things without additional major harm to anyone or any programs.
But it is more probable that the Governor and Legislature will continue to work and function as it has before in resolving this crisis and the crisis next year and beyond.
That isn’t a cynical view of how our state government works. It is the reality of what is. And that is probably the most scary thing of all for the rest of California.
The California Disability Community Action Network, is a non-partisan link to thousands of Californians with developmental and other disabilities, people with traumatic brain injuries, the Blind, the Deaf, their families, community organizations and providers, direct care, homecare and other workers, and other advocates to provide information on state (and eventually federal), local public policy issues.
Comments
This is a very well written article. Thanks.
I have been following the crisis for weeks now. I fear that my SSI/SSP will eventually be cut down to nothing. There are thousands of us who live well below the poverty line now because of our disabilities. At 60, I have worked most of my life and paid my taxes but I can't work anymore.
I was born and grew up in Northern Cali and can't hardly afford a small room in San Diego, where I have lived 8 years. Because of the lawmakers insensitivity, people/families will be living in their cars and on the streets. What was once a great State has been ruined and buried in debt by the hands of all who have been our decision makers. I am discusted and saddened by the whole mess!
Posted by: Janice at July 9, 2009 12:52 PM
This is a very well written article. Thanks.
I have been following the crisis for weeks now. I fear that my SSI/SSP will eventually be cut down to nothing. There are thousands of us who live well below the poverty line now because of our disabilities. At 60, I have worked most of my life and paid my taxes but I can't work anymore.
I was born and grew up in Northern Cali and can't hardly afford a small room in San Diego, where I have lived 8 years. Because of the lawmakers insensitivity, people/families will be living in their cars and on the streets. What was once a great State has been ruined and buried in debt by the hands of all who have been our decision makers. I am discusted and saddened by the whole mess!
Posted by: Janice at July 9, 2009 12:54 PM
This is a very well written article. Thanks.
I have been following the crisis for weeks now. I fear that my SSI/SSP will eventually be cut down to nothing. There are thousands of us who live well below the poverty line now because of our disabilities. At 60, I have worked most of my life and paid my taxes but I can't work anymore.
I was born and grew up in Northern Cali and can't hardly afford a small room in San Diego, where I have lived 8 years. Because of the lawmakers insensitivity, people/families will be living in their cars and on the streets. What was once a great State has been ruined and buried in debt by the hands of all who have been our decision makers. I am discusted and saddened by the whole mess!
Posted by: Janice at July 9, 2009 12:56 PM
I still don't feel it is right they way the governor is insisting on balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.
He doesn't want to tax oil or tobacco just cut all the programs that help children-unemployed-and our elderly-disabled citizens-especially our senior citizens.
He has slashed the s.s.i payments to the elder twice already this year and wants to slash even more.
He has denied low income sr citizens a tax credit for this year.
He took back the increase in the payments to the blind and disabled but doesn't want to raise any taxes for oil and tobacco.
I can only say that the democrats are right in defending the poor and down troden because in so doing they are following the bible where Jesus said." for comforting not the least of mine, yea have failed to comfort me>"
The governor is luckywhen he says he goes home and has his cigar and his sauna because there are many people who don't even have a job or a place to live-and many people go hungry evey day in our state.
But I guess since he isn't running for any political position he just doesn't care.
Posted by: Harold Longanecker at July 9, 2009 01:51 PM
I still don't feel it is right they way the governor is insisting on balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.
He doesn't want to tax oil or tobacco just cut all the programs that help children-unemployed-and our elderly-disabled citizens-especially our senior citizens.
He has slashed the s.s.i payments to the elder twice already this year and wants to slash even more.
He has denied low income sr citizens a tax credit for this year.
He took back the increase in the payments to the blind and disabled but doesn't want to raise any taxes for oil and tobacco.
I can only say that the democrats are right in defending the poor and down troden because in so doing they are following the bible where Jesus said." for comforting not the least of mine, yea have failed to comfort me>"
The governor is luckywhen he says he goes home and has his cigar and his sauna because there are many people who don't even have a job or a place to live-and many people go hungry evey day in our state.
But I guess since he isn't running for any political position he just doesn't care.
Posted by: Harold Longanecker at July 9, 2009 01:54 PM
From the LA Times
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-illegal10-2009jul10,0,3398621.story
Godinez, a 43-year-old undocumented Mexican immigrant, left an abusive family and lives in transitional housing. Four of her five children are citizens and receive a total of about $650 each month from the state's CalWorks program. She also receives about $500 in federal food stamps and other vouchers.
Multiply by a million, give or take. There you have it.
Posted by: Erik Kengaard at July 10, 2009 10:20 AM
Guess what Erik--her children are citizens, there's not a damn thing you can do about it. Pick a real issue.
Posted by: Doug at July 10, 2009 10:29 AM
The main point, Doug, is that we can predict the consequences of our future actions by reflecting the consequences of our past actions. The actions relevant to this matter are border security, immigration enforcement, Senator Feinstein's AgJobs bill, and amnesty bills being considered by congress. All of the foregoing are very real issues. And we can do something about them.
Reflecting on the past, I conclude that immigration related actions by congress in 1965 (Hart, Cellers, Ted Kennedy, et al)and in 1986 (Simpson, Mazzoli, Dan Lungren, Robert K. Dornan, et al), (a) greatly increased the number of people dependent on government welfare, (b)contributed significantly to California's budget problems, and (c) further burdened this country's infrastructure and resources.
We need fewer immigrants in general, and it would be well if those few were very bright and reasonably wealthy.
As to doing anything - some of us are sufficiently realistic to see the downside of unrestricted immigration, astute enough to understand the Democrats' interest in creating a Patron Client state in which they are the patrons and the poor are the clients, perceptive enough to understand the Republicans' motives in bringing in cheap labor to pay off their business masters, and we have done something. In 2006 we stopped the 2006 Kennedy-McCain Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act.
Every day, thousands of people are starting to realize the downside of unrestricted immigration, and taking action.
By the way, every day thousands of people are starting to realize the deep divisions and increasing polarization on a number of issues, including health care, housing policies, regulation (or not) of the financial industry, taxes, etc. The comments posted in this forum illustrate this polarization.
Posted by: Erik Kengaard at July 11, 2009 08:41 AM
No doubt immigration is among the many issues that need to be solved, but do you solve it by depriving the blind, elderly or the disabled??????????
Posted by: mala at July 11, 2009 10:50 AM
No doubt immigration is among the many issues that need to be solved, but do you solve it by depriving the blind, elderly or the disabled??????????
No, Mala. Quite the opposite. You help the blind, elderly and disabled by limiting immigration to the best and brightest - those who are able to provide for themselves, and some others, including the blind, elderly and disabled.
If the people of this nation, of which California is a large part, had not voted for open borders, California would not have been flooded with third world poor and the resultant enormous burden of those poor, and their children.
Several million immigrants have contributed 2,237,962 students from low income families to California's over stressed school systems. Look it up at http://www.nccp.org/profiles/CA_profile_6.html
They have also contributed to the problem of crime. Look it up:
http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=403
Thus, while incarceration rates are found to be extraordinarily low among immigrants, they are also seen to rise rapidly by the second generation. Except for the Chinese and Filipinos, the [crime] rates of all US-born Latin American and Asian groups exceed that of the referent group of non-Hispanic white natives.
Posted by: Erik Kengaard at July 11, 2009 12:32 PM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 