Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

Judge Blocks IHSS Worker Wage Cut

marty_omoto_june2004.gifBy Marty D. Omoto
Director/Organizer
California Disability Community Action Network

Federal District Court Judge Claudia Wilken issued Friday (June 26) a preliminary injunction stopping the State from implementing its reduction in state spending for In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) worker wages from $12.10 per hour (includes benefits) to $10.10 per hour, plus 60 cents for benefits, that was scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2009. Wilken, in a short two page order, said that the State needed first to conduct “an analysis” of its proposed cut, as required by federal law and regulations.

The State said it would appeal her ruling to the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Previous appeals to that court by the State to lift injunctions that blocked the State from implementing cuts to Medi-Cal providers last year and this year have failed.

As reported earlier, the ruling is a victory for nearly 400,000 IHSS workers even though not all would be directly impacted by the decision because they currently make only the state minimum wage – or wages less than $9.50 per hour. It also is a major victory for the over 400,000 children and adults with disabilities (including developmental), the blind and low income seniors in the IHSS program who worried that any reduction in funding for IHSS worker wages would mean a loss of workers or services.

Wilken’s order made no mention of the issue of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors voting to reduce IHSS worker wages in that county – and it appears her preliminary injunction will not apply to that issue.

Her order also does not impact other cuts to IHSS that is scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2009 impacting the IHSS “Share of Cost Buy-Out” program that was passed as part of the 2009-2010 State Budget passed in February – or new proposals that would reduce funding and narrow eligibility for IHSS that have not yet been approved by the Legislature or Governor yet.

Similar Order Issued By Different Judge To Stop Cuts To Medi-Cal Providers

A similar order and required “analysis” was issued by a different federal judge last year and also earlier this year that blocked the state from implementing its rate reductions to most of the Medi-Cal providers.

Attached to this CDCAN Report – and also on the CDCAN website at www.cdcan.us, is a pdf copy the 2 page order. The federal judge said she a longer written order would follow.

The Legislature approved the Governor’s proposal to reduce state funding (participation) for IHSS worker wages to $9.50 per hour plus 60 cents for benefits as part of the 2009-2010 State Budget passed in February – four months early. A proposal by the Governor in May to lower that funding even further – to the state minimum wage of $8 per hour plus 60 cents for health benefits, was rejected by the Budget Conference Committee controlled by legislative Democrats.

TWO PAGE ORDER BY FEDERAL JUDGE:

The two page written order says:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKESHA MARTINEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
Defendants.

No. C 09-02306 CW PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California; JOHN A. WAGNER, Director of the California Department of Social Services; DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services; JOHN CHIANG, California State Controller; and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them, are HEREBY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from implementing California Welfare and Institutions Code § 12306.1(d)(6) without first conducting the analysis required by 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(30)(A), as described in Orthopaedic Hospital v. Belshe, 103 F.3d 1941, 1493 (9th Cir. 1997).

A reasoned written order will follow.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/26/2009

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

CDCAN NOTE

The reference to California’s Welfare and Institutions Code which gives the State the authority to reduce state funding to IHSS worker wages to $9.50 per hour plus 60 cents for health benefits, effective July 1, 2009 (this is the section in state law that the federal judge is blocking):

Section 12306.1 (d)(6) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) to (5), inclusive, the state shall participate as provided in subdivision (c) in a total cost of wages up to nine dollars and fifty cents ($9.50) per hour and in individual health benefits up to sixty cents ($0.60) per hour. This paragraph shall become operative on July 1, 2009.

The other references – to US law and a lawsuit, deals with federal Medicaid laws and regulations.

The California Disability Community Action Network, is a non-partisan link to thousands of Californians with developmental and other disabilities, people with traumatic brain injuries, the Blind, the Deaf, their families, community organizations and providers, direct care, homecare and other workers, and other advocates to provide information on state (and eventually federal), local public policy issues.

Posted on June 28, 2009

Comments

So state will conduct the study as required by the court and will implement the cuts. State is within is authrority to make the cuts that was blocked by federal court one the study is done.

Posted by: rep at June 28, 2009 01:00 PM

It will be interesting to see the reaction of the court when California has nothing but IOUs with which to pay their employees.

Posted by: George Hanshaw at June 28, 2009 08:34 PM

It would be even more interesting to see the Republican Minority have to enact reductions of Tax Breaks currently enjoyed by Oil Companies and other Corporations here in California.
All Corporations, as they are Individuals in Law, shoul have to shoulder their share of the hardships of this economis downturn.

Posted by: Reid at June 29, 2009 03:09 PM

"So state will conduct the study as required by the court and will implement the cuts. State is within is authrority to make the cuts that was blocked by federal court one the study is done."
Not if they find that it is not going to save them any money. Just "doing" the study does not guarantee the gov success in making his cuts.

Posted by: robert atserof at July 8, 2009 05:56 PM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker