Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Assembly Proclaims June LGBT Pride Month Despite GOP Link To Prop 8

By Dan Aiello
California Progress Report
The California state assembly on Monday passed resolution HR 17, proclaiming June, 2009 as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender pride month.
But controversy arose when one Republican assemblyman linked the resolution’s encouragement to Californians “to work to help advance the cause of equality” for LGBT residents with proposition 8 and marriage equality for same-sex couples.
As with previous years, there was coordinated opposition by Republican legislators with Assemblyman Ted Gaines (R-Roseville) rising to speak against the resolution. Mr. Gaines, whose biography claims he is an evangelical insurance broker, reprimanded his colleagues for failing to acknowledge “the will of the people,” as he linked HR17 to proposition 8 in his call to oppose the resolution calling for equality for gay and lesbian Californians.
“I must regrettably rise in opposition, both to this resolution and the ceremony which will accompany it,” said Gaines. “We stand today in the peoples house. All the people, not just the few. It is appropriate that the assembly recognize and appreciate the myriad diversity that comprises the California mosaic. And I congratulate those who are working selflessly to help those in need and those who are suffering. But it is sadly evident that this resolution and the ceremony today is less about that and much more about advocating changes in the law that run counter to the will of the people, and I cannot be a party to that,” he said.
“I believe that HR 17 is an outright reaction not only to a plurality of viewpoints but also to the decided judgment of our initiative and judicial processes. It is essential that legislators in the peoples house respect the views of the majority and of the voters of this state in our institutions and pushing resolutions like this one to show millions of Californians that the majority party in the legislature thinks their views don’t matter. It says that their deeply held beliefs and the judgment of their courts are somehow not legitimate.”
Assemblymember Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), dressed in a light blue striped seersucker suit and black and white patent leather loafers, responded to Mr. Gaines proposition 8-directed comments. “I really didn’t see any mention of marriage,” replied Mr. Ammiano. “Though I understand why a connection would be made as we stand here today to acknowledge the people whose shoulders many of us stand on, including past and present members of the LGBT caucus, Ms. Migden, Ms. Kuehl, Ms. Goldberg, Mr. Laird, Mr. Leno and ms. Kehoe.”
The resolution passed 45-6, with 21 assembly members either absent or abstaining. Following the vote, all but seven Republican legislators left the chambers. The resolution had 43 co-sponsors.
Outside the Assembly chamber following the event, Mr. Ammiano responded to the GOP reaction. “That kind of behavior always is going to be with us until we achieve true equality. I have respect for my colleagues and it’s painful they feel this is a distance that cannot be bridged. But in the meantime, get over yourselves. It’s not about them, it’s about us, and I think we’re doing fabulous.”
“I wanted to just compliment the members of the Republican caucus who stayed on the floor,” Senator Christine Kehoe (D-San Diego) told the BAR, noting that during the previous ceremony GOP legislators left as a group, “Which was definitely intended to be a statement to oppose equal rights for LGBT Californians. There are clearly differences here in Sacramento. Democrats by in large support equal rights for LGBT Californians, Republicans oppose them, but maybe there’s a little light at the end of the tunnel, some softening of their oppositon, and that would be a good thing,” Kehoe told the BAR.
The seven GOP legislators who remained through the ceremony were Assemblymembers Van Tran, Nathan Fletcher, Curt Hagman, Audra Strickland, William Emmerson, Anthony Adams and Dan Logue.
Those LGBT community members honored were Ivy Bottini, Jose Sarria, Megan Hogan Bienestar Human Services (for Latino HIV outreach), Brigadier General Keith Kerr, Father Geoffrey, Miss Major, and Helen Zia.
Comments
How laughable is Gaines objection? First, he decried the May 16, 2008 supreme court ruling that allowed same-sex marriage equality, only to now stand in the assembly chamber and defend the state court? And the will of the majority? Is he kidding? The proposition passed by less than 4 percent and, if he really cared about the will of the majority wouldn't he work with the majority party to help pass a balanced budget? Is hypocrisy and cynicism now the exclusive domain of the Grand Obstructionist Party legislator? Come on now, don't hog all the fun, the less-than-honorable, Mr. Gaines.
Posted by: Paulie at June 26, 2009 09:42 AM
I say good for them. They just make themselves look both childish and evil, and further speed the death of republicanism, especially in California. It's all good.
Posted by: Terran at June 26, 2009 10:30 AM
Credit where due: Good on the 7 Pubs who stayed. Must have taken a lot of courage.
Posted by: No Elephants at June 26, 2009 10:31 AM
21 of them were either absent or abstaining
This is actually good news. These people knew it would pass without their votes yet they let that happen. What people don't do says volumes about them. Let's see. They're too cowardly to actually vote either way because it's bound to piss half their consituents off. They worry their vote will hurt them later, no matter how they vote. They've put their finger in the air and have surmised from whence the wind blows, and it blows progressive. Like most self-serving politicians they're willing to change their stripes to rainbow hues for the sake of expediency.
Whatever reason they have it isn't because they stand by their convictions, unless their convictions entail the willingness to do anything to keep their jobs. This shows they do see developments down the line.
Congratulations to all my gay friends and co-workers. June is the month that most people choose to get married (when they have a choice, and not just a window of opportunity), so let it be so for all human beings. I rejoice at every step in the right direction.
Posted by: lunatica at June 26, 2009 10:33 AM
7 stayed. Hagman and Logue voted no. How is that helping? Who else voted no?
Posted by: truth at June 26, 2009 11:13 AM
LOGUE IS THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE FROM MY DISTRICT, and UNFORTUNATELY, WE NEED THE GLBT COMMUNITY TO HELP US TRACK HIS EVERY VOTE AND SPEECH AND ACTION TO OVERCOME HIS OUT OF AREA BIG FINANCIAL SUPPORT SO THAT HE IS A ONE TERM ASSEMBLY MEMBER. I cannot even us the word representative, because he clearly is out of step with NEVADA COUNTY AND NEVADA CITY RESIDENTS.
Posted by: C L Walker at June 26, 2009 11:41 AM
"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." - Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Equality for all Californians, Tolerance of others, respect for all. Freedom of religion is as worthy as Freedom from religion. Above all, it is un-American to support any attack on our secular constitution and our secular government.
Posted by: justicana at June 26, 2009 11:59 AM
Out of curiosity; what month will heterosexual pride be celebrated?
Posted by: sean at June 26, 2009 12:50 PM
Every day of every month from the beginning of man until now.
Posted by: Doug at June 26, 2009 12:55 PM
Heterosexual pride month? First you call minority groups from the herd, beat them down with stereotype, slur and discrimination - then, when they stand back up and endure, you ask, "what month will heterosexual pride be celebrated?"
You're like those white supremacists whose very existence is reason enough to celebrate America's diversity.
And in the end, isn't that what this is about? To stand up to people like you, sean? To stand up and say we are more alike then we are different and all of us should be afforded a level playing field.
But then how could sean feel good about himself if that were the case?
Posted by: Justicana at June 26, 2009 02:56 PM
In 2008 Sacramento and Santa Clara county reported 100 % increases in anti-gay hate crimes. That alone seems like a pretty good argument for the assembly to "encourage equality."
Posted by: terran at June 26, 2009 03:01 PM
Sean, if you want to get picky, try focusing your attention on punctuation; your semicolon is as ergegious as your heteronormativity.
Also, Sean, are you one of those people that asks when "White History Month" and "Men's Appreciation Month" are going to be? If so, you miss the point, and you probably know you miss the point, and you're probably just being snide for snide's sake.
Celebrating LGBT pride in the month of June is in honor of the Stonewall Riots (do yourself a favor and look it up before you make any more asinine comments about Gay Pride) and when we, as a community, embraced the maxim "out of the bars and into the streets".
We've come a long, hard way from silence and innuendo; we demand our equal and civil rights with the same veracity as women and people of color have done so in very recent decades.
For me, I'm proud to be gay because I'm certainly done being ashamed. I shouldn't speak for anyone else, but I'm inclined to believe that others feel the same way...
Posted by: Kyle at June 26, 2009 03:37 PM
One would think these guys would spend their time better getting a budget out before the whole friggen state - LCBT and straight - goes broke.
Every day that passes without a budget drives the interest expense on Cal GO munis and revenue anticipation notes higher and higher.
If they don't solve the $25 billion problem shortly, they'll convert it to a $30 billion problem. Screw around then and it becomes a $35 billion problem.
Time is not on our side in this situation.
Posted by: George Hanshaw at June 26, 2009 09:20 PM
One would think these guys would spend their time better getting a budget out before the whole friggen state - LCBT and straight - goes broke.
The Dems have been working very hard at balancing a budget that doesn't completely eliminate every essential program, from parks to police. But once again, as in February, the Republicans are enjoying a role as obstructionists.
I knew a long-conservative family from Hollister who denounced programs like Medi-Cal and aid programs for the disabled. Then sadly, their teenage son was in a car accident and became a paraplegic. They suddenly saw the need for these programs. While I can appreciate how those who are well off or have adequate healthcare coverage would want programs they don't used cut, I can't help but wonder what kind of person they are to lack any empathy for their fellow man. These usually are the same people who claim a love for God, yet their actions prove that claim false. "That which you do to these, the least of my children, you do unto me." I don't just believe, I know, that the GOP is the Godless Obstructionist Party. God bless the Dems, they're doing God's work.
Posted by: walter at June 27, 2009 09:14 AM
Well at least we can think of all the money that will be spent on fundraising for the next 5 or 10 years as we fight back and forth to let the gays marry, then snatch it away from them, then let them marry, then snatch it away again. If we could only get poor people to work for those campaigns on either side, maybe they can make some money too!
Posted by: Jimmy in Los Angeles at June 27, 2009 03:56 PM
God bless the Dems, they're doing God's work.
In that case, we certainly can't support them for elective offices. Separation of Church and State, and all that.....
In a related note, Osama bin Laden believes he's doing God's work too.
Posted by: George Hanshaw at June 27, 2009 10:40 PM
In a related note, Osama bin Laden believes he's doing God's work too.
That's true. No one believes they're doing God's work more than the Republicans. The only question is whose God. They imposed with the help of the Knights of Columbus "Under God" onto our secular government. They cite in political ads and party platform parts of Leviticus that condemn those they don't like and ignore the words of our forefathers, that all men are created equal. One thing's for sure, we all know they've never heard the compassionate words of J.C.
What was it that Senator Lindsey Graham said yesterday: "The Republican party is a party of sinners." It may be the first time I've ever agreed with the man.
Posted by: walter at June 29, 2009 10:06 AM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 