Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
- Governor Proposes More Raids of Public Education Dollars
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Budget Crisis Means Cuts To Vital Health Services For California
By Hanh Kim Quach
Health Care Policy Coordinator
Health Access California
The Senate Budget Subcommittee which oversees the health and human services budget, chaired by Los Angeles-are Senator Alex Padilla, reviewed an array of 25 cuts to the health budget, many of which have already been heard and rejected several times this past decade.
Still, with a growing budget gap approaching $30 billion by July 1, 2009, lawmakers are shining a light in every corner. Earlier this week, the state’s four top financial officers issued dire warnings on Monday when describing the state’s fiscal future. By March, the state would literally not have any cash to pay its bills.
It was against that backdrop that the Senate subcommittee Wednesday heard proposals that would have made extremely low-income seniors pay more and low-income children get less.
The cuts included:
* Denying nearly a half-million low-income working parents Medi-Cal coverage, by lowering the eligibility from 100% to 72% of poverty level, cutting off eligbility for parents in families of three making more than $13,000. The cut would be $8.6 million in 2008-09; $109 million in 2009-10, and $342 million in 2011-12, ultimately impacting over 429,000 California parents.
* Eliminating dental, vision, podiatry and several other benefits for 2.5 million parents, seniors, and people with disabilities on Medi-Cal coverage.
* Siphoning funds away from public hospitals on which we all rely.
To view the entire agenda of the hearing, click here.
THE DEBATE
The tenor of the debate was set almost immediately with the first proposal, which would require seniors, blind and disabled individuals who earn $871 a month to have to spend at least $271 on medical services before their expenses are picked up by the state.
“How would an aged, blind and disabled person be able to pay over $270 a month for health care services, and then pay rent and eat with $600,’’ said Sen. Elaine Alquist. “And that isn’t considering the high cost of living.”
The Department of Finance answered: “We recognize that these are difficult choices..’’
But Alquist shot back, “I only ask that they be real choices….and I don’t hear an answer on how this is really doable.’’
Fellow committee member Roy Ashburn shot back that he was fed up with this type of examination of social programs.
“If that is going to be the reaction, then there are some in this committee that are not going to go for cuts. And there are some who recognize the dire situation,’’ he said. “I’m not advocating that we be heartless or harsh. But we can’t balance this budget if the answer is going to be ‘no.’’’ said Ashburn, who has signed the American’s for Tax Reform “no tax’’ pledge.
The remainder of the hearing continued with a similar tone, with administration and department officials testimony giving a hook for lawmakers to become more passionate about their positions.
In another testy exchange, Republican Bob Huff proposed a $50 copay to use the emergency room for non-emergency services as a means to divert people to other places for care. “If this is not a critical urgent thing, there’s another place to go nearby,’’ Huff said.
The Department of Health Care Services, however, reported that the state already charges a $5 co-pay for using the emergency room inappropriately, prompting a snicker from Sen. Dave Cox of Fair Oaks. “With a $5 copay, why should I go anyplace else,’’ Cox said.
Angela Gilliard from the Western Center on Law and Poverty explained: “Five dollars may not sound like a lot to many of us on this committee; we buy lattes and go to lunch. But $5 is a lot’’ to the population that must rely on the state’s health safety net for services--and $50 was enough to discourage a low-income Californian from getting needed care, even emergency care.
WHAT’S NEXT
The committee took no votes today, but Padilla made clear that wasn’t the purpose. The purpose was, “to create daylight to work together.’’
For instance, Padilla noted the copay issue – that perhaps some level of copay between $5 and $50 was in order. Padilla also seemed inclined to continue to delay the start of the SB437 pilot programs, which would streamline enrollment for children into Medi-Cal and Healthy Families, thus getting more eligible children insured--a worthy goal but one that would cost more money.
The Senate and Assembly budget committees will be meeting throughout the next two weeks before the December holidays.
At a press conference the same time, a frustrated Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told reporters that he felt lawmakers are doing a dismal job while the state “headed toward financial Armageddon.’’ Schwarzenegger has called the Legislature into a second special session to address the budget, under which the body has until January 15th to pass some mix of “solutions’’ – cuts or revenues – on the magnitude of between $17 billion to $24 billion.
Hanh Kim Quach is the Health Care Policy Coordinator for Health Access California. Before joining the organization, she worked as a journalist for nearly 9 years covering issues in California. Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has also been published on the Health Access Weblog.
Comments
Dave Cox probably has cadillac insurance, already funded by taxpayers...why the snicker at Medi-Cal recipients? How rude.
Why not up the legislative co-pays while they're at the game? Too much effort? Too Republican.
Posted by: Elizabeth at December 14, 2008 01:58 PM
this budget cut situation is hurting people with disabilites and what arnold is doing is wrong we as disabled people are also fellow americans and we should be treated with respect and having are capitol make these cuts will hurt us all we are humans and we are not animals and dirty people we want to live a normal functional life like other people and we should be treated like americans and we should be able to keep all of our services and we deserved to have these things so that we can get our voice herd and telling arnold that we may be disabled but it dose not stop us from fighting to keep our services that we all need to live our lives as memebers of our community and this proposed budget cuts is making us have a trrrible life and it will also make us feel that we are bad peole and we need to let sacramento know that we will not stand around to let them do these cuts we need to fight and make sure that this proposed budget cuts stop hurting disabled americans who want to be happy and healthy.
Posted by: jessica simon at January 21, 2009 01:51 PM
this budget cut situation is hurting people with disabilites and what arnold is doing is wrong we as disabled people are also fellow americans and we should be treated with respect and having are capitol make these cuts will hurt us all we are humans and we are not animals and dirty people we want to live a normal functional life like other people and we should be treated like americans and we should be able to keep all of our services and we deserved to have these things so that we can get our voice herd and telling arnold that we may be disabled but it dose not stop us from fighting to keep our services that we all need to live our lives as memebers of our community and this proposed budget cuts is making us have a trrrible life and it will also make us feel that we are bad peole and we need to let sacramento know that we will not stand around to let them do these cuts we need to fight and make sure that this proposed budget cuts stop hurting disabled americans who want to be happy and healthy.
Posted by: jessica simon at January 21, 2009 01:51 PM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 