Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

Last Week’s California Budget Vote: Failure or First Step Toward Solutions?

Robert-Cruickshank.gifBy Robert Cruickshank

The legislature voted last week on the Democratic budget plan and, predictably, Republicans refused to vote for it, unwilling to support a tax increase. Closing a $17 billion hole in the budget with cuts alone would pretty much destroy government, which is of course their goal. In turn that would send California from a recession into an outright Depression, as the safety net would crumble and job losses would skyrocket.

The media's coverage of the budget debate is equally predictable. The Sacramento Bee framed yesterday's vote as a "last ditch effort" and the article opened with phrases like "debated, complained and pointed fingers of blame Tuesday." Arnold compared the legislature to a kindergarten, which I am hoping is not a set-up for some 1990 movie flashback.

The result of such coverage is to further depress public interest in and engagement with the budget process. Reporters make it sound like the Legislature is dysfunctional or doesn't care, conveniently sliding past the fact that the budget delays are solely the product of Republican obstructionism.

That means we need to look beyond what the media says to the actual plan the Democrats put forth:

• $8.1 billion in new revenues, from a tripling of the VLF and from freezing the current income tax tables
• $8.1 billion in cuts, including $4 billion to schools and $100 million to community colleges

• $800 million in fund transfers and other gimmicks

It's not a great plan, and the Democrats' united opposition to education cuts from the spring seems to have melted away. That's not a good sign, as the budget fight that began in 2007 seems to move inexorably toward the Republicans.

At the same time, this plan needs to be seen as a first step toward a budget solution. Legislative support for a restored VLF is a big step in the right direction, reversing 10 years of supporting that flawed tax giveaway. Action on the income tax is also a good move, although I would like to see Democrats return to their summer budget plan that called for a restoration of the 1990s tax brackets for higher income Californians.

That dovetails with the winning tax platform Obama used in his campaign. Note the word campaign. Sacramento Democrats need to start campaigning on the budget. Too often they have been focused on deal-making inside the Capitol and failed to aggressively sell their plans and their framing to Californians.

Tomorrow dozens of new members will be sworn into the legislature. Their new energy can help take this plan, improve it, and build the public support necessary to implement it by breaking Republican resistance.
Let's hope that the new members bring a fresh attitude to the budget - one that recognizes this thing will NOT be solved inside the Capitol with a vote or a backroom deal.

Robert Cruickshank is a historian, activist, and teacher living in Monterey. He is a contributing editor at Calitics.com and works for the Courage Campaign, in addition to teaching political science at Monterey Peninsula College. Currently he is completing his Ph.D. dissertation in US history, on progressive politics in San Francisco in the 1960s and 1970s. A native Californian, he was raised in Orange County and educated at UC Berkeley.

Posted on November 30, 2008

Comments

Mr. Cruickshank,

More activist than "historian" once again...

You neglected to mention the recent history: How many legislators, democrats in particular were not even in Sacramento working our budget problems over the last two weeks, starting with the leader of the Assembly, Democrat Speaker Karen Bass...who was in DC on other business that must have been more important than our states economic condition (A conference on mental health wasn't it?)

Yea, sure, it is ALWAYS just the republicans who are at fault...

You continue with double-speak: Is the VLF a "tax" as you say or a "fee" which is what the last letter of VLF implies. Perhaps you are comfortable with words that don't mean what they really mean anymore, but it sure bit Gray Davis and put Arnold in his place, didn't it? And you assume the voters won't pay attention to a "new" higher VLF "tax" as you say?

Perhaps you should run for office on the platform of raising the VLF and see how you do!

Just as I will like to see Obama's campaign "promise" taken up by California democratic leaders, "A tax CUT for 95% of taxpayers".

I won't hold my breath, but perhaps you will?

Posted by: Jay Gould at November 30, 2008 11:19 AM

Robert,

Any portion of a legislature that is determined to “destroy government”, as you opine, sounds pretty “dysfunctional or [uncaring]” to a reasonable person.

This is well below the standard of californiaprogressreport.com. Reasonable arguments exist. However, such repugnancy just makes us look silly.

Posted by: paul at November 30, 2008 08:35 PM

Posted by: easyforbuy at May 16, 2009 02:05 AM

Posted by: Come In Showers at June 5, 2009 01:19 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker