Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

With Friends Like New York Times Columnists Thomas Friedman, Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich – Does Barack Obama Need Enemies?

Clint-HeadShot.gifBy Clint Reilly

Forget the exhausted claims of “liberal bias”; the Times has a serious smugness problem on its hands. Even I – a life-long Democrat, Obama supporter, Times subscriber and daily reader – find the paper’s pomposity and orthodoxy difficult to stomach. An October 1 column on the Times op-ed page illustrates my point.

Noted Times columnist and best-selling author Thomas Friedman (The World Is Flat) was irate. The U.S. House of Representatives had just voted down the $700 billion bailout. Friedman fumed, smoke billowing from his column in great clouds:

“I’ve always believed America’s government was a unique political system – one designed by geniuses so it could be run by idiots. I was wrong. We have House members, many of whom I suspect can’t balance their checkbooks, rejecting a complex rescue package because some voters, whom I fear also don’t understand, swamped them with phone calls…”

No words more clearly illustrate the attitude of moral superiority and intellectual certainty that perfumes the op-ed pages of the New York Times.

Here, Friedman is typically incredulous.

Why, those ignorant plebeians had the gall to barrage their elected representatives with outrage! And worse, the sniveling politicians actually caved to the people’s wishes!

Isn’t this democracy at work?

Whether the bailout bill was good or bad is beside the point. Friedman’s depiction of the plan’s opponents as blithering imbeciles doesn’t even permit the legitimacy of alternative points of view, let alone their possible merit. And yet many noted economists and academics across the country and around the world expressed deep skepticism about the bailout package as it was constituted.

When a heavily revised bill came to the Senate floor on the eve of Friedman’s column, 10 conscientious Democratic senators still voted against the bailout, including respected names like Russ Feingold, Byron Dorgan, Mary Landrieu, Debbie Stabenow, Ron Wyden and Tim Johnson.

While Obama dashes around the country trying to reach out to voters with a message of unity, the Times’ haughty, predictable echo chamber on the op-ed page convinces Middle America that coastal voters really are elitist snobs.

Virtually every column penned by Maureen Dowd drips with this type of caustic vitriol. Her poison pen earned her a Pulitzer during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, challenged Al Gore’s masculinity during the 2000 presidential race, and then churned out years of scurrilous assaults on Hillary Clinton’s agenda and motivations. Skewering public figures is part of a many columnists’ job description, but Dowd’s screeds are notable for their sanctimony as much as their mean-spiritedness.

Take her recent attacks on Sarah Palin. You could fill a book with legitimate criticism of the vice-presidential candidate, but Dowd characteristically took her withering scorn two steps further. Writing during a recent stop at Palin’s home town of Wasilla, Alaska, Dowd went out of her way to ridicule the local population:

“I wandered through the Wal-Mart, which seemed almost as large as Wasilla, a town that is a soulless strip mall without sidewalks…I talked to a Wal-Mart mom, Betty Necas, 39, wearing sweatpants and tattoos on her wrists. “She said she’s never voted, and was a teenage mom ‘like Bristol.’”

Dowd’s column that Sunday was only one of three in the Sunday Times promoting Obama while thumbing a nose at large swaths of America crucial to his success. Intellectual condescension may work on the editorial page, but it backfires dramatically in the political arena.

The subtle message of these Times columnists is too often that those who disagree with them are dullards.

They should remember that pride goeth before the fall.

Clint Reilly’s initial foray into political consulting at age 23 developed into a successful 26-year career in politics, during which he founded the nation’s largest political consulting firm of its time. Reilly managed winning campaigns for a wide variety of high-profile candidates, including current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and former California State Senate President Pro Tem Dave Roberti. Recently, Reilly has led the battle to preserve media competition in the Bay Area via two landmark anti-trust lawsuits (Reilly v. Hearst and Reilly v. MediaNews, et. al.). Reilly was chairman of the board of Catholic Charities/CYO from 2002 to 2006 and is active in a variety of civic and charitable causes. This article first appeared on www.clintreilly.com/ and is republished with his permission.

Posted on October 07, 2008

Comments

As much as I love Dowd and liberal newspapers (I prefer the LA Times) I have to agree with you. I don't like condescension on either side of the aisle.

Posted by: eryn at October 7, 2008 12:45 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker