Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

They’d Attack Mother Teresa for Not Having a Real Job to Get Elected—And They Don’t Put Their Country or the Truth First

frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

An iconic figure in California politics, the Progressive Republican Governor almost a hundred years ago, Hiram Johnson, coined the phrase, “The first casualty of war is the truth.” Well, in reigniting the cultural wars of the 1960’s and taking a page from the disgraced Spiro Agnew who resigned from the Vice-Presidency in disgrace and indictment, the national Republican ticket is at it again. Bring on the “effete corps of impudent snobs” frame that Agnew was so famous for, attack the press for doing their job in following up with legitimate questions we need answered, smear the other candidate in a very personal and below the belt way, and most importantly, shift the attention from the issues of this campaign—the economy, the war, and the need to clean up the wreckage from the last eight God awful years under George Bush.

The attack on Barack Obama’s work as a community organizer—helping displaced workers deal with shut down steel factories—basically living the social gospel, walking the walk—when he could have had any six figure job in a cushy law firm with having pulled himself up by his bootstraps Horatio Alger like and not only graduated from Harvard Law School but as Editor of the Harvard Law School—is nothing short of despicable. It does not appeal to the better nature of our souls. It is demeaning, snickering, and the kind of nattering nabobbing of negatisism that shows those running the Republican talking points show here are truly not putting love of country above winning the election at all costs.

They’d attack Mother Teresa for not having a real job to win. They care nothing about destroying the idealism and the return of many Americans to voting and civic engagement that Barack Obama has fostered.

And to Hell with the accuracy of what Palin and others have had to say. They want the headlines they got today where her speech is treated in the manner of coverage of a sporting game—she’s scored on points--the headlines “Palin comes out swinging…,” “Solid speech,” etc. read like some of the commentary at the Olympics about whether someone nailed a gymnastic move.

I’ll give you just one of many big examples that stuck in my craw. They try to assassinate Barack Obama’s character—his integrity with the meme that he is just like all the other politicians—and that he opposed the War in Iraq and the surge because it was the popular thing to do—the easy way out—as opposed to John McCain’s bravery in supporting it, even though unpopular, because he puts country first. Well, if truth be told, it is Barack Obama who has had the Profile in Courage moment here. Obama opposed the Iraq War at the beginning, when it was politically risky to do so—some at the time characterized opposition to the war at that time as committing political suicide. Disagree with his position if you will—go ahead and say that the war that Bush got us into was a great idea if you will. But the below the belt attack here is beneath the dignity of anyone who wants to lead this nation—in the number one or two spot.

So, they are taking a strength—his willingness to take the other path—and even his work as a community organizer—social work—and turning them into points of attack, smear, and innuendo. The community organizer comments really rankled me—as I, too, have an Ivy League education and graduated from one of the best law schools in the country and for most of my legal career dedicated myself to helping poor working stiffs, many from the middle class, and their families deal with the devastating effects of work injuries, the disorienting loss of pride of no longer being a bread winner, and actually did a lot of social work. I, too, could have gone into any high paying law practice and sold my soul. I chose the path not usually taken. And I washed dishes in the family restaurant starting in my junior high school years to get there. And i am so happy I did so.

So, I commend a few articles to you to think about in the days to come: What this all means and what not only the headlines, but the probing, ought to be in articles and in our discussions around the water cooler.

First, Joe Garofoli in the San Francisco Chronicle, “Palin seizes the night, but questions remain.” Here are some key passages:

“Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin left many unanswered questions last night in accepting the Republican nomination for vice president. No speech, no matter how impressive - and hers was, delivered with both verve and vigor - can put to rest the serious questions that are being raised about the extent of her experience and the extremism of her views on myriad issues….

“Palin did not flinch in taking on the Democratic nominee, Sen. Barack Obama, in a forceful way. She chided his experience as "a community organizer" and his record in the U.S. Senate. She contrasted the experience of a "season as a gifted speaker" with the "lifetime of achievement" of her running mate. …

“Still, it must be noted that Obama has been subjected to the most intensive scrutiny on the planet since he announced for president in February 2007. The uncomfortable chapters of his background and depth of his knowledge on an array of issues have been plumbed, probed and pummeled. There are hours and hours of tape of Obama answering detailed questions from voters and journalists.

“Palin's speech was decidedly soft-focus, by design. She evoked her opposition to the "Bridge to Nowhere" without having to reconcile her reversal of position. She did not mention her views on creationism, abortion, gay rights or the censorship of library books.

“This was her night, and she seized it. It should, however, leave most Americans wanting to hear much more about a potential world leader.”

And from today’s LA Times, a lengthy and quite thoughtful article “Blurring of journalism lines in Palin story hurts public,” by James Rainey, that contains this telling passage, among others:

“We heard it for the second day running Wednesday. The Republicans devoted much of their energy to knocking down the mythical, monolithic "media." A group of Republican women led by Carly Fiorina faced down a room full of reporters at the convention center here and demanded that the Palin "smears" stop.

“Former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, in particular, railed about the unfairness of it all. I thought maybe I had missed something, so I followed Swift into the hallway.

“I asked her to name the legitimate news outlet that had smeared McCain's running mate. Swift looked crestfallen.
“"Well, the Daily Kos," she finally offered, citing the blog where political lefties go to post their rants.

“"How about one big mainstream news organization?" I prodded. "There must be one that has smeared Gov. Palin."

“Swift seemed confused. She looked toward an aide. Surrounded by a scrum of reporters, she lowered her head and moved away.

“That's because partisans don't feel one iota of guilt about damaging the press, one of our most important institutions, if it helps them rouse their core supporters. Why not slam all the media for smearing Sarah Palin, rather than single out the tabloids or blogs that have earned the derision?”

After they’ve had their fun hitting Obama like a piñata and getting what Orwell described in 1984 as their fifteen minutes of hate, I hope we can get back to the issues.

Late last night, I got an email from the Obama campaign—sent to millions--that hit the nail on the head. Here’s part of what it said:

“Both Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Palin specifically mocked Barack's experience as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago more than two decades ago, where he worked with people who had lost jobs and been left behind when the local steel plants closed.

“Let's clarify something for them right now.

“Community organizing is how ordinary people respond to out-of-touch politicians and their failed policies.

“And it's no surprise that, after eight years of George Bush, millions of people have found that by coming together in their local communities they can change the course of history. That promise is what our campaign has been about from the beginning.

“Throughout our history, ordinary people have made good on America's promise by organizing for change from the bottom up. Community organizing is the foundation of the civil rights movement, the women's suffrage movement, labor rights, and the 40-hour workweek. And it's happening today in church basements and community centers and living rooms across America.

“Meanwhile, we still haven't gotten a single idea during the entire Republican convention about the economy and how to lift a middle class so harmed by the Bush-McCain policies.

“It's now clear that John McCain's campaign has decided that desperate lies and personal attacks -- on Barack Obama and on you -- are the only way they can earn a third term for the Bush policies that McCain has supported more than 90 percent of the time.”

Turning the McCain-Palin-Giuliani talking points on their head, this is the best part: “But worst of all -- and this deserves to be noted -- they insulted the very idea that ordinary people have a role to play in our political process.”

Indeed they did. And yes, we can make a difference in this election.

Posted on September 04, 2008

Comments

Mr. Russo,

Your whole article defends Obama's community organizer role...but says nothing about his performance as a state senator nor one in Congress. Perhaps there isn't much there to look at,(Palin didn't even go there. Perhaps nothing to loook at then?) and a glance at a calendar is enough evidence on that score alone; he just hasn't been around very long to have done much anyway...

Consider:

-How many times did Obama vote "present" vice yes or no on bills? Too many. Way to many to appear decisive.

-How was it politically "risky" for him to oppose the Iraq War, when he was in NO POSITION to vote on it? (Was it merely pandering to the far left when he did?) Recall he lambasted and perhaps bested Hillary Clinton in the democratic primaries over this issue as she did vote FOR the war and subsequent funding bills for it...

-He was against the "surge" in Iraq. This week the US turned over security to the Iraqi's Anbar Province, the former hottest one in Iraq. Yet Obama hasn't said the obvious: The Surge worked. Now-NOW, we, and the Iraqi Government, are talking of a timetable for troop withdrawl. Something you don't do when "loosing" a war...

Plus he campaigned on ending the war in Iraq within 6 months of being elected; again he beat up Hillary over this concept as she was actually more pragmatic over "withdrawl". Now that Hillary has fallen by the wayside, Obama say we should be there for 18 more months! That was more of Hillary's original position...

There is more, but isn't it obvious that BOTH parties will exaggerate and distort whatever is REAL for political expediency? Especially as the clock continues to tick towards November 4th?

We haven't even had a single debate yet. Also, it is too early for an "October Surprise".

Your words here could easily be transfered to read from a republican perspective and have the same validity or effect; some real, some imagined or spin.

The voters need to listen to as much as they can get their hands on. Hopefully, their experience in doing so will help them separate the wheat from the chaff in making thier decision.

Man, your anger is flowing through you here. Recall that is the way to the dark side...

Posted by: Jay Gould at September 4, 2008 10:15 AM

Good morning, Jay:

Well, I thought my article was long enough and there is, a lot more to be said. I said that the community organizer sneers were one of many things that bothered me about the speech. I could write all day about the others.

If you read the article as a whole, I am angry, but hopeful. And I hope that this goes to a constructive place.

Keep reading.

Posted by: Frank D. Russo at September 4, 2008 10:44 AM

Amen to (almost) everything you said, but I couldn't keep reading after this line:

"I, too, could have gone into any high paying law practice and sold my soul."

Say what? You find it offensive when Palin says community organizers have no actual responsibilities (amen), but according to you, high paid lawyers have sold their souls?

Posted by: Travis at September 4, 2008 06:14 PM

Travis: Perhaps I could have said this better. Not all lawyers who go into high paying work have sold their soul. Just as it says in the Bible that it is not money, but the love of money that is the root of evil, what I was trying to say is that when people have the opportunity to make money and make the choice to do something that is in service to a cause, that that is noble. And in denigrating community organizing, social work or things that people do because they want to help people, they are missing something.

Posted by: Frank D. Russo at September 4, 2008 11:20 PM

"Obama" Follow the money(it's not grass roots)
g

Posted by: Gordon at September 5, 2008 09:57 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker