Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Risk--Not the Game--Not a Game

Anthony-Wright.gifBy Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California

If there's one thing you read about the presidential election related to all the happenings on Wall Street, take a look at Ron Brownstein in the National Journal. It makes the link between the financial sector crisis and policy on retirement, health care, and other hot-button issues. He quotes Jacob Hacker, author of the The Great Risk Shift, and soon-to-be-professor at UC-Berkeley, about the fundamental question in this election. Read the whole thing, but here's a few paragraphs:

“Although neither McCain nor Obama has framed the situation this way, their reactions to this transfer of risk and responsibility represent a fundamental dividing line between them. Like President Bush, who touted an "ownership society," McCain has welcomed these shifts of responsibility as giving individuals more control over their financial future. On several fronts, McCain in fact wants to accelerate these trends.

“Today, most Americans still receive their health insurance through group coverage (either from government or employers) that shares risk and cost between the healthy and the sick. Relatively few obtain insurance in the individual market, which exposes consumers to much wider variations in cost and coverage depending on their health. McCain's proposal would push more people toward the individual market (perhaps 20 million more, according to an independent study released this week) by replacing the tax break that promotes employer-based coverage with an individual tax credit....

“Obama, by contrast, wants to strengthen the institutions that promote the sharing of risk. His health care plan aims to buttress group-based coverage, either through employers or new government-sponsored purchasing networks. He adamantly opposes private accounts under Social Security and would instead offer tax incentives for workers to invest for retirement in accounts intended to supplement Social Security's guaranteed benefits.

“In all these respects, the McCain-Obama contest represents a fork in the road that will likely determine whether the nation continues to shift more financial responsibility to individuals, or seeks opportunities to restore more sharing of risk. This week's chaos on Wall Street, which rattled millions of workers relying on the markets to fund a decent retirement, shows how much average Americans have at stake in that choice. "This is a critical watershed moment," Hacker correctly notes, "because it really captures in sharp relief both the stakes and what the core of this debate is."”

Brownstein overlooks that Obama did explicitly counter the "you're on your own" philosophy of the so-called "ownership society" in his convention speech, which didn't get much attention because of the announcement of Sarah Palin's selection the next day.

“In Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really means is - you're on your own. Out of work? Tough luck. No health care? The market will fix it. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps - even if you don't have boots. You're on your own.”

But the rest of the analysis by Brownstein and Hacker is spot-on. This debate is bigger than all of us, including Obama and McCain.

Following the financial sector's lead?

Right now, the hot magazine is not Rolling Stone, or Wired, or Maxim, or People, or but Contingencies, the publication of the American Academy of Actuaries.

There's an article in the current issue by Senator John McCain, talking about his health care plan, where he explains his philosophy of deregulation:

"Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition, as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation."

Paul Krugman at the New York Times, Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo, Joe Klein at Time, Steve Benen at The Washington Monthly, Ezra Klein at the American Prospect, all make the point, in different ways, that John McCain thinks the banking industry is a good model for the health insurance industry to follow.

Not the best week to make that point in writing.

Our legislative advocate Beth Capell made the same point, but the quote and the article make the link explicit.

McCain wants to eviscerate consumer protections--including fiscal solvency standards--for health insurers, which seems only to invite the disaster we now see on Wall Street. As Beth indicates, there's lots of history to suggest what the problems would be with such lack of oversight.

We need more, not less, oversight over the banking, financial, and insurance industry. $700 billion is just the latest figure of what the price of such lack of oversight is.

Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has also been published on the Health Access Weblog.

Posted on September 21, 2008

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker