Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- From the New Publishers of the California Progress Report
- Standing in the Doorway of College Bound Californians
- Court Must Weigh Tyranny of the Majority in Ruling on Prop 8
- It’s About Time to Change California’s Initiative Process
- Governor Schwarzenegger: Please Don’t Declare 2009 the Year of Anything
- Last Week’s California Budget Vote: Failure or First Step Toward Solutions?
- States Take Action to Stop Privatization Abuses and Reform Contracting Processes
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Without More Assembly Democrats Voting for Health Reform Bill SB 1522, It Will Die in the Last Days of the Legislative Session
Nunez and Other Democrats Who Voted for Its Provisions as Part of Comprehensive Health Reforms Have Failed to Support Bill

California Assembly yesterday as it begins final votes on remaining bills
By Frank D. Russo
As the California Assembly is about to start its engine on what may be the last day of the 2007-08 regular session, with an invocation and a salute to the flag, followed by the Senate which will be in session starting at 10 a.m., it is hard to do justice to the many bills that have passed, died, or are still in the process. It’s been one heck of a week to give focus to the many important bills that are in the balance and wait an uncertain future even if they land on the Governor’s desk. Even if we did not have conventions going on in Denver and now the Twin Cities, selections of running mates for the presidential candidates of both major parties, and the stuff that spews from all talking heads out there on radio, television, and in print.
As the day starts, I want to focus on one bill, SB 1522, an important health bill in a year that has been the demise of many more ambitious attempts to pass comprehensive legislation in this area that the Governor might sign. This is a bill that would set standards for the individual health care market in California and allow those who purchase individual health care coverage to compare apples with apples. It is authored by incoming Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, a thoughtful policy wonk, and is in danger of losing on the Assembly floor—not because of the unfortunately predictable opposition from Republican legislators (I take that for a given) but because Democrats who have voted for these provisions when they were part of the Nunez-Schwarzenegger compromise comprehensive bill, ABX 1 1, have not voted for it as a stand alone bill.
Anthony Wright of Health Access California, a sponsor of SB 1522, wrote on these pages about its importance. He pointed out in that article in detail the problems with the current approach and said:
“SB1522 (Steinberg) organizes the individual insurance market and makes it understandable for consumers. It would allow consumers to see and understand their choices in the individual market, and be better informed about a plan's premium, benefits and cost-sharing. By setting a standard for coverage, it would also effectively weed out a lot of "junk" insurance.
“Consumers in the individual market would have a better sense of their health coverage choices, since all health plans sold in the individual market would be classified into five "tiers." In this way, consumers would be able to know if a certain plan is a top-tier comprehensive plan, or a bottom-tier catastrophic plan, or something in between, and if one plan from one insurer is roughly comparable with another plan by another insurer. This provides some standardization and simplification of the marketplace, while preserving a wide range of choices for consumers.
“To allow real price comparison, Insurers would be required to offer five "benchmark" plans, one in each tier. The bill would enable consumers to do cross-insurer price shopping, to make apples-to-apples comparisons, with the confidence of knowing that benchmark plans in a given tier have similar cost-sharing, benefits, and other plan features. The benchmark plan would help define the tier, by being the lowest-price plan in a given tier.
“The bill would eliminate some "junk" insurance, products that are coverage in name only, that provide such limited benefits or leave consumers so financially exposed, that the product is not of value. Such plans, deceptively offer "coverage" but leave consumers facing major gaps in coverage and significant out-of-pocket costs. Insurers would not be able to sell new plans that do not meet the minimum benefit standards.”
Yesterday, when it was brought up for an Assembly Vote, despite being on call for hours and the opportunity to vote for it, Speaker Emeritus Fabian Nunez and 7 Democratic Assemblymembers did not vote. One of those members, Nell Soto is seriously ill and not attending the remaining days of the session. Five Democrats joined 31 Republicans in voting against it. It failed on a 36-36 tie vote, 5 votes short of the necessary 41 votes to pass it.
Yet when AB X 1 1 had these provisions, it passed the Assembly 46 to 31, with all Democrats supporting it except for Soto who was ill then and not voting and with one vacancy. Why have 5 Democrats, Felipe Fuentes (who was elected to fill a vacancy after AB X 1 1 was voted on) and Nicole Parra, Jesse Solorio, Alberto Torrico, and Cathleen Galgiani voted against SB 1522? And why did Democrats Charles Calderon, Fabian Nunez, Kevin De Leon, Tony Mendoza, Anthony Portantino, and Wayne Furutani (who filled a vacancy after his predecessor voted for AB X 1 1) vote against SB 1522 yesterday?
The bill has been under intense lobbying to defeat it by Blue Cross and the insurance industry. Is this part of inter house rivalry with lingering resentment for the Senate’s refusal to pass AB X 1 1 in January? For either of these reasons, the failure to pass SB 1522 to help California’s health consumers see what it is that they are buying is a public policy set back that will be on their records. They have a chance to vote for this bill on its reconsideration today or, if in session tomorrow, the last day it can be passed under our state constitution. We’ll be watching, along with other Californians. Five more votes is all that is needed.
Comments
My heart sunk after learning about the defeat of SB1522. I testified before both the Senate and Assembly Health Committees as a self-employed cancer survivor whose bottom tier Blue Cross coverage provided hardly the level of care I expected and needed to fight cancer.
Only during one year, 2005 did my insurance truly come to my rescue, when expensive in-hospital radiation treatments enabled me to meet my $3500 combined deductible and co-pay.
It provided limited coverage the year I had ultrasound, MRI, biopsy, lumpectomy and chemotherapy. During the 3 years of follow-up care, it has covered close to NOTHING .
I had to resort to MediCal gap insurance, research charity programs, plead with medical billing offices and negotiate with creditors. That took hours out of my recovery time and work day. How many other consumers are willing or able to do that?
My cancer, thus far, has not metastisized, but my debt certainly has!
If I upgrade to better coverage, I will end up spending almost as much for my premiums as I pay out of pocket for health care. I would rather put my money into my medical providers than an administrative middle man.
Is there any chance SB1522 can pass now, or is it lost?
Susan Braig,
Altadena
Posted by: Susan Braig at August 30, 2008 09:47 PM
Mr Fuentes can be expected to do the bidding of his big pharma, insurance and chorus of big corporate donors and developer-ordered legislative initiatives to kill universal health care and to deny meeting the 2020 greenhouse gas reductions, along with getting off big oil and big power.
The Green Party and my campaign does not take money from corporate donors and I represent the real constituents of the 39th District to achieve universal single-payer health care, a net-zero-energy resource-based green collar, solar-thermal, post-big oil economy where watershed restoration and bioregional determinism are driven by relocalization of the production of food, energy and goods, and the local development of currency, governance and culture.
Save our Neighborhood - Stop Payola Politics
Posted by: Jack Lindblad, Green Party Candidate for 39th Assembly Seat at September 1, 2008 04:23 AM
HealthMarkets, formerly known as UICI and a major purveyor of junk insurance, recently was fined $20 million following a 35-state investigation conducted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. That money is going into the General Funds of various states including California, but not a dime will reach the victims. According to the Wall Street Journal, 200,000 policyholders suffered more than $252 million in unpaid medical bills from 2000 to 2002 from such scams. The failure of the Legislature to enact reforms is the height of irresponsibility and an indication of corruption on a grand scale.
Posted by: David Henderson at September 1, 2008 01:46 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 