Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

The Decline And Fall Of Arnold Schwarzenegger

dday.gif By David Dayen
d-day

Arnold Schwarzenegger didn't just vow to keep taxes low, he ran an entire campaign in 2006 based on scaring people into believing that his opponent would raise taxes by $18 billion dollars. None of it was true, but he hammered away at it. In the one and only debate he chided Phil Angelides, saying "you love taxes" and other nonsense. Dan Weintraub even remembered this spiel:

"They get into their car, they're taxed. They go to the gas station, they're taxed. They go for lunch, they're taxed. This goes on all day long. Tax, tax, tax, tax, tax. Even when they go to bed, you can go to bed in fear that you are going to be taxed while you're sleeping, that there is a sleeping tax."

The admission of defeat, that there's no way to balance this budget without revenue increases, is truly astonishing. What's more, the broad-based sales tax he's proposing, the most regressive imaginable, really would tax Californians at virtually every point of the day. He's become a caricature (if he wasn't one already).

The proposal amounts to an admission of failure. Running in 2003 as a novice politician after careers as a bodybuilder and actor, Schwarzenegger thought he could cut taxes, control spending and balance the budget, ending what he called "those crazy deficits." But the fiscal and economic problem was more complicated than he knew, and the politics far more vexing.

Schwarzenegger did cut taxes. He campaigned on a pledge to roll back the vehicle license fee, or "car tax," which his predecessor, Gray Davis, had tripled. And on Schwarzenegger's first day in office, the new governor issued an executive order reducing the tax by two-thirds.

But controlling spending proved far more difficult, as, ironically, that first tax-cut order foretold. The car tax against which Schwarzenegger had railed, while controlled by the state, was actually a source of revenue for local governments. And so when Schwarzenegger reduced it, he also made good on a pledge to pay cities and counties what was then $4billion a year to make up for what they lost when he cut the car tax.

The state, however, did not have that money to spare, and the payments to cities and counties added to the deficit Schwarzenegger had vowed to eliminate. That obligation to local government has since grown to $6 billion – not coincidentally the same amount that would be raised by the sales tax increase Schwarzenegger now supports.

The VLF was the original sin here, but not the only one. The problem is structural and the VLF would have only delayed the inevitable. The truth is that the state is only built for success, never for a downturn like we're currently having. And so this results in gimmicks like slashing state employee salaries and putting them in the middle of a budget spat, or borrowing more and more to pass the deficit on to our children and grandchildren.

(The latest on the wage cuts, by the way, is that the governor is demanding that his order be followed, which John Chiang will refuse, leading to a likely lawsuit. Chiang really is a hero in all of this, and he's filling a leadership vacuum. Marcus Breton has a nice profile today.)

Schwarzenegger has never concerned himself with the business of governing - he preferred slogans to policy. And with the policy going to crap, the slogans sound more hollow - especially the one that goes "tax, tax, tax, tax, tax."

Dave is a writer, comedian and TV/film editor based in Santa Monica. He is an elected member of the Democratic State Central Committee from the 41st Assembly District. He blogs on state and national politics at http://d-day.blogspot.com/

Posted on August 06, 2008

Comments

How is it all Arnold's fault when we have all those (democratic) legislators "working" these issues?

Your right, the VLF isn't/wasn't a solution, yet the left hangs so much on it. Recall (pun intended) the people of the state DIDN'T LIKE IT, paying $400 annually to merely do the paper drill of car registration...

Where is the democratic courage to RAISE TAXES? Not just now with an overdue budget, but ALL the legislative year? As you noted, the state is geared for sucess and has zero ability to handle tougher days economically...

So why don't our legislative leaders know this and fix it?

Raising taxes is not the only tool, cuts are too...

It takes political courage to raise taxes OR propose cuts, and our legislature (led by dems) hasn't any.

Arnold? You guys can have him. After all, he tried playing on your side of the court and failed...

Posted by: Jay Gould at August 6, 2008 11:09 AM

What do you expect when you hire an actor to run government. You would think they would want some real experience. But what person or political party would do a dumb thing like hire a actor to run government ?...

Posted by: Engineer Bill at August 11, 2008 11:36 AM

Republican.

Posted by: SRK at June 30, 2009 11:04 AM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker