- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
The California Budget Debate: Swanson Delivers Impassioned Plea for Accountability and Truth Telling on Assembly Floor—Chides Republicans for Partisanship
By Frank D. Russo
You could tell last night as the Assembly debated and before Republicans blocked passage of the California state budget, that East Bay Assemblymember Sandre Swanson had strong feelings about what he was hearing. His microphone shot up, and he delivered a spell binding speech from the heart that had to be seen or heard to be fully appreciated.
Here is what he said:
“Our debate on the budget has become very partisan, and having our debate I think is very important for the people of the state of California. The Republican speakers have mentioned on several occasions that the Democrats are interested in raising taxes.
Now, we are interested in a budget that speaks to priorities. I agree with many of the speakers who say Californians are hurting, unemployment is high, we’re in a down economy, we have a recession. we’re in a housing crisis. So, I agree we must act and do something.
The Republicans have offered a spending cap. Now we had a hearing on ACA 19 Friday, and I asked the honorable Vice-Chair, “If the spending cap was in place today, would the rules and the procedures offered in this constitutional amendment from the Republicans allow for us to address the housing crisis?
The answer is no.
Would it allow us to deal with the rising unemployment?
The answer is no.
Would it allow us to fund after school programs to deal with our growing dropout problems in the state of California?
The answer in the Republican plan is no.
One of the things we’re saying is that the Democrats are proposing a budget, and the budget stands for something. California must stand for something. Education needs to be a priority.
Now, let me just address this question of higher taxes. To the average Californian, are they talking about you? When they say they don’t want your taxes raised? I don’t think so. They’re talking about the people who would have to pay under this plan, who make $500,000 a year. They don’t want them to pay any more taxes. They’re talking about corporations, corporations that need to pay the rate they were paying in 1997, because it’s important for everyone to be accountable and to share responsibilities at this moment.
But what they’re not telling you is this: the average Californian, without the help of the State, will pay more. Because we’re talking about your priorities. They will pay more because you will have a parcel tax in your school district and you want your children to learn, so you’ll pay more. So we don’t act, we shift the burden to your school district.
They want us to cut health to the poor and the needy so that we don’t raise taxes in Sacramento, so we don’t get those who make $500,000 a year and those corporations to share. But does that give you any tax relief in your county and your town? No. Because those patients will show up in your county hospital in your trauma center and you have to raise money in your county, and again we’ve shifted the burden.
Now it’s time for some accountability and some truth-telling. This budget is before this house. This budget should be acted on not as Democrats and Republican, but as conscientious legislators who committed themselves to this Constitution to serve the needs of the citizens of this state.
Our people in this state are hurting. I say to you, all my colleagues, cast your vote. I say to the people of California, watch that vote. If you don’t like it, tell your legislator about it. We have to get on with a budget that serves the needs of the people of this state.”
Comments
Mr. Swanson:
You are right on the money. Shame on those who did not pass the budget. I say to those that voted against it to get out of the political arena. This house is full of criminals serving thier own self interests. I have never seen such corruption in protecting the rich.
Posted by: MrMagoo at August 18, 2008 05:16 PM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
