Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Republicans See the Public as Losers and Whiners
By Dave Johnson
We already know that Republicans hate government by the people. According to them, if you are not rich you are a "loser" who deserves nothing because you are not "contributing" to the corporate economy.
After New Orleans it was pretty clear that they also just hated the people. Recently McCain economic adviser Phil Gramm said the country's problems with the economy are a "mental recession," and said of people losing their homes, jobs, pensions and health care: "We have sort of become a nation of whiners"
Well, here is another example. Open Left found this. Here is Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, talking about the thousands who drowned in New Orleans:
“So I don't want anybody telling me that we have to offset a disaster relief package for the Midwest where people are hurting, when we didn't do it for New Orleans. Why the double standard? Is it because people aren't on rooftops complaining for helicopters to rescue them, and you see it on television too much? We aren't doing that in Iowa. We are trying to help ourselves in Iowa. We have a can-do attitude. It doesn't show up on television like it did in New Orleans for 2 months.”
People trapped in rising water, downing, were whiners "on rooftops complaining for helicopters to rescue them."
Conservatives say that the poor are "losers" who "made bad decisions" and shouldn't be "rewarded." Here is a typical example, at the Republican TownHall website:
“Liberals feel an irresistible instinct to take sides with the less fortunate.
“While the right wants to reward beneficial choices and discourage destructive directions, the left seeks to eliminate or reduce the impact of the disadvantages that result from bad decisions. In place of the conservative emphasis on accountability, the left proffers a gospel of indiscriminate compassion.
“This leads directly, and inevitably, to the liberal passion to sanctify victimhood.
“"Enlightened" lefties long to embrace and exalt all those who claim to have suffered from hard luck or oppression: the homeless, single mothers, "people of color," homosexuals, AIDS patients, feminists, convicted criminals, Native Americans, atheists, immigrants and many more.
“[. . .] In fact, the recent hearings about the shabby treatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reade Medical Center represented a concerted effort to transform America’s military into a victims group worthy of liberal sympathy.
“. . . Moreover, raising taxes on high earners in order to provide more give-aways to the unproductive clearly punishes success while rewarding failure.
“. . . Leftists feel virtuous and unselfish for invariably embracing the losers, but with this persistent preference it’s society itself that loses most.”
This is beyond nasty. This is hateful. Unfortunately it is just typical of what you find when you read conservative opinion these days. This is hatred of humanity.
People drowning in a flood are "complaining." The poor are "losers."
It is time to restore humanity to our discourse. It is time to reject these conservatives and their nasty, hateful excuses for their own greed and fear.
Dave Johnson is the founder and principal author at Seeing the Forest, a web magazine investigating how the right is beating the Democrats. He is a fellow at the Commonweal Institute, a Board of Directors member of Media Transparency, an advisor to The Philanthropy Network, and a member of the Netroots Advisory Council of the Drum Major Institute. This article originally appeared on Seeing the Forest and is republished with permission.
Comments
Mr. Johnson, you say above, "...talking about the thousands who drowned in New Orleans".
Thousands? Please state your source/reference in regards to "thousands".
You need to be careful: an embellisher is no better than those he is trying to degrade with his embellishments, all things being equal.
I think if you read Senator Grassley's comment carefully, he was making an opinion on (liberal?) media coverage known. You just chose to view it your own way.
Posted by: Jay Gould at August 1, 2008 09:00 AM
Since headlines are written to entice people to read an article, I'd say that success was achieved. Here's another fine example, though, of great heat and little light generated by current news and opinion writing. Who cares anymore if it's written from the Left or the Right? Both sides gleefully lob their word-grenades at the other. Not a hint anywhere of solutions or where we go from here.
Grenades that leave debris to trip us. Heat which throws up smoke to obscure.
Posted by: Wayne Blankenship at August 1, 2008 09:01 AM
Good point Wayne.
Posted by: Jay Gould at August 1, 2008 12:10 PM
According to the Louisiana Dept. of Health and Hospitals, there were 1,464 confirmed dead in Louisiana, and the number of missing is estimated at various figures between 135 and 2500. Given that the missing after all these years are probably also dead, "thousands" isn't much of a stretch. And I'll grant you that maybe they didn't all drown. Certainly a significant portion died of other, equally horrible causes. But quibbling about how many people drowned in New Orleans only obscures the real point.
Senator Grassley has been pontificating from atop this particular soapbox wherever people would listen, maybe to help the people of Iowa, but also assuredly to help the Republican Party (which lacking a true plan strives always to make Democrats look as bad as possible). Senator Grassley never mentions the $2.65 BILLION dollars which congress has already appropriated for midwest disaster relief, probably because he knows the Executive Branch run by his party hasn't figured out who to hand them out to yet. In the words of Senator Tom Harkin(also from Iowa), "If there's any lack of funds in Iowa right now . . . it's not because of Congress."
I think the comparison to the Katrina disaster is more apt for its similarities, e.g. FEMA and other relief agencies hamstrung by an Executive Branch full of people appointed for their loyalty who couldn't manage their way out of a wet paper bag, and people suffering needlessly as a result, than for its differences.
But then again, being a Democrat, I tend to blame the idiots at the top rather than the victims.
Posted by: Ralph Ward at August 1, 2008 08:22 PM
Ralph,
Once again, the article above says, "Here is Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, talking about the thousands who drowned in New Orleans:".
The Grassley quote that follows has no reference to the "thousands" who drowned. The author plugged that inference in there himself.
Notice also the author referenced a city, New Orleans where "thousands" drowned. Your own research mentions the ENTIRE STATE OF LOUISIANA, not just the city of New Orleans.
You can't use two different scales simultaneously to "fix" the initial embellishment. Or was it just a mis-use of facts? Only the author knows...
But I have to tell you, if a government agency has a spread between 135 and 2500 folks missing, a 2365 person spread to be exact, there is something wrong with how they count things up isn't there?
Or perhaps they use the same formulas when collecting taxes and making up a budget...
Regardless, Grassley has to speak up for his folks but in praise during a time of duress and to get them whatever funding he can get his hands on. It is his job. What would you think of him if he DIDN'T do that?
What would you think of your representative to the federal government if a similar disaster hit your area and that person didn't do anything?
You guys gotta stop the partisan stuff somewhere and get real. Both in taking care of EVERYONE using an unbiased viewfinder and in the use of "facts" in your partisan arguments.
Posted by: Jay Gould at August 2, 2008 05:34 PM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 