Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

Our latest headlines

Want more? Dive into the archives.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Books

Cavala: A.A.R.P. Backs Schwarzenegger Redistricting Scheme Opposed by California’s Democrats (Now Why Would They Do That?)

towashington 089.gif By Bill Cavala
A veteran of over 30 years in Sacramento

Another shameless set of bogus arguments supporting Prop 11, the Governor’s redistricting scheme. This one uthored by the President of the American Association of Retired People. Now why, one would ask, would the AARP support a Republican funded initiative that would remove redistricting authority from a majority-Democratic
legislature?

Good question.

Answer one is what Mario Savio said about the “system” in 1964. To paraphrase, “there comes a time when it’s (the system) is so odious that you have to jam the mechanism, break the machine”. AARP President Jeannine English begins her argument in a similar vein: If you don’t like budget gridlock, the lack of health care reform or the fact that the Legislature hasn’t found a cure for cancer, you should support Prop 11 because it will shake up the status quo.

As Savio found out, “jamming the machine” led not to utopia but to eight years of Ronald Reagan. Prop 11 will lead, not to a liberal utopia, but to a legislature controlled by the same obstructionist Republicans that – with only 32 Members – have produced the logjam the AARP now objects to.

But opposing Prop 11 is to “block change” and, presumably, to put those of us who oppose “change” in the reactionary camp opposed to Obama for President. Well, I for one support the “change” that Obama represents – a change from eight years of Republican misgovernance. But does that mean that all “change” is a good thing because it means something different? A Republican Legislature would be a “change” too.

A bad “change”.

The AARP has more specific reasons for supporting Prop 11. They argue it would insure “cities and counties are not divided to benefit incumbent legislators”. The AARP should know that “Cities and Counties” have NOT been divided to benefit incumbent legislators –they were kept whole by the Legislature’s redistricting except where population equality or federal civil rights law or legitimate partisan concerns made it necessary. Prop 11 provides no new guarantees.

The AARP argues that the Governor’s Commission will meet openly and that no decisions will be made “behind closed doors”. More bogus arguments. The Legislature held dozens of hearings on redistricting – none of which were attended by the AARP, whose interest appears recent. When the Court did redistricting in 1991, they held one hearing. Court Masters that drew district lines did so “in secret” behind “closed doors” and made only one change in the proposed lines because of complaints at the one public hearing. The legislature published its proposed maps prior to its second set of hearings and made dozens of changes in the final maps as a result of public input. The final lines were accompanied by a “detailed narrative about how the districts lines adhered to population equality, city and county boundaries, and the federal voting rights act. This was not considered revolutionary. The fact that Prop 11 includes this same requirement is not a selling point; it is a restatement of current law and practice.

Finally, the AARP argues that Prop 11 will “break the partisan gridlock” in the Capitol. If that means that Prop 11 will make it possible for the Republicans to regain majority control and reduce the Democrats to a minority position, then they are absolutely right.

So if you support increasing the number of coo-coo bird Republican Legislators at the expense of Democrats, then join the AARP and Prop 11’s GOP contributors in support of this mindless “change”.

But if you’re a progressive, then join the California Democratic Party, the vast majority of Elected Democrats in the Legislature, Civil Rights advocates, our Democrats in Congress and Speaker Pelosi in opposition to Prop 11.

Bill Cavala was Deputy Director of the Assembly Speaker’s Office of Member Services where he worked for over 30 years. He attended undergraduate and graduate school in the 1960’s and received a doctorate in political science at UC Berkeley. He taught political science at UC Berkeley during the 1970's while he worked part-time for the State Assembly.

Cavala left teaching at UC Berkeley and went to work for Assembly Speaker Willie Brown in 1981 until his tenure as Speaker ended in 1995, and he has worked for his five successors as Speaker. He now manages election campaigns for Democratic candidates.

Posted on August 25, 2008

Comments

Thats what so predictable about you holy lefties. You wouldn't know the truth is somebody put it on a hot poker and shoved it where it might do some good. Glad to see the world hasn't changed.

Posted by: Notyou2 at August 25, 2008 02:51 PM

If voting for Prop 11 would lead to 8 years of Ronald Reagan, you just put forth the best argument I've heard FOR this proposition!

Posted by: sean at August 25, 2008 03:10 PM

What kind of garbage is this? Can’t Cavala debate an issue like a rational person? Did you ever notice that Cavala never offers a rebuttal to any of the arguments against gerrymandered districts except to throw sand in your eyes? He never tries to defend the present system. His only kind of debate is to attack with distortions and propaganda. His only way of addressing serious writers on Prop 11 is to disrespect them, and to call them names.

In his latest “article”, Cavala comes on like the drunk heckling a performer. He asks a silly rhetorical question (“Why would they”), and then congratulates himself for asking such a “Good question.”

He rolls out a whole set of taunts and half-truths. Phrases like: “shameless set of bogus arguments”, “the Governor’s redistricting scheme”, the “Republican funded initiative”, “coo-coo bird”, “and mindless ‘change’”. The only thing mindless about his arguments is his total disrespect for his opponents, as well as for the reader. Good God, he even invokes the ghost of Mario Savio!

Cavala is just a bully running around the school yard dumping your lunch on the ground. What better argument could there be for changing this broken, gerrymandered system that has brought our government to it’s knees.

Vote YES on Prop 11

Posted by: George at August 26, 2008 09:13 AM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.

Stat tracker