Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

$3 Billion for California Prison Health Care in This Terrible Year of Budget Deficits Can Be Avoided if Our State Government Acts

Kelso Explains and Answers Questions from the Press—Are Our Leaders Listening?

Kelso-at-Sacto-Press-Club.gif
By Frank D. Russo

Federal Court appointed Receiver Clark Kelso’s announcement yesterday that he has filed papers with the court seeking $8 billion from the State of California for prison health care construction has received a lot of ink. It is on the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle, in dozens of California papers, and even made the New York Times. There is much gnashing of teeth, excuses of not being told details of the construction plans or just what exactly the minimum level of car is that is required, and expressions of outrage by some of the recalcitrant Republican legislators who refused to pass a bond to deal with this problem. There is hand wringing that Kelso’s requested order would add, by his own admission, $3.1 billion to the state’s budget deficit this year—just as there are signs that our long overdue budget may finally be passed with a deal that is in the works.

But in most of this, what is lost, is the fact that there are over 70 court orders stretching back over a decade that have been issued by the federal courts and there are signs that the judges are beyond losing their patience with the lack of compliance by California with these prior orders. The handwriting is clearly on the wall—there’s a judgment and finding that the medical care we deliver to our inmates is below the constitutional minimum required and that the state will pay to fix it. And most importantly, there is a way to avoid a $3 billion hit this year if a two-thirds majority in both houses of our state legislature would pass a bond to finance what the court is going to order.

But then again, it’s not really news that we have a game of chicken being played with the state budget with a James Dean style racing of cars down the middle of the road at each other waiting for someone to blink. This just adds to our problems and makes the consequences greater if there is a crash.

I had the opportunity at yesterday’s Sacramento Press Club to ask Kelso what the payout would have been had legislation been passed on this rather than what he is seeking to have the court order this. Here is what he said about SB 1665 that was defeated on the Senate floor May 29 when 14 of 15 Republican Senators voted against it:

“The amount if they passed 1665 would have been less than $100 million this year. Because the way bond financing works—and this is going to be a lease-revenue bond, you actually don’t hit the General Fund for lease payments until you have finished your construction which is going to be two-and-a-half to three years down the line.

“So, had they passed a bond, there would have been virtually no financial impact this year and the first impact would have been probably 3 years down the line…

“The General Fund impact would be delayed and when it did hit, if you do a bond, it is probably $500 to $600 million a year.”

Earlier in the day, Kelso held a press conference, and this is part of what he said:

“The court has previously held that California’s prison medical care system constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution due to the lack of access to basic health care.

“We have fully explored and exhausted every avenue for securing this funding in a manner that least affects California’s taxpayers and this year’s budget process, but the state’s leaders have failed to act. Therefore, it is with great reluctance, and yet a sense of firm conviction, that today, I seek the court’s intervention to secure this funding.

“The motion comes after the California Senate twice failed to authorize bond funding for the Receiver’s construction program, a refusal born of the Senate Republican Caucus’s insistence that funding for the Receiver be tied to changes in other legislation.”

Lest you think that Kelso’s action is part of some wooly headed Democratic agenda and that he is being unkind in laying responsibility for failure to act on Republican legislators, bear in mind that he is a registered Republican.

He’s known as “Mr. Fix It.” He described his mission narrowly to the Press Club as: “Our job is to, as soon as practicable provide constitutionally adequate medical care to the inmates of the CDCR in a delivery system the state can successfully manage and sustain. That’s out job. And it’s to turn it back over to the state.”

This is what U.S. District Court Judge Henderson said in appointing him as the second prison receiver:

“J. Clark Kelso is a Professor of Law and, for the last twelve years, has been the Director of the Capital Center for Government Law and Policy at the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California. He comes to the California Prison Health Care Receivership with over fifteen years of experience in a wide variety of positions in all three branches of state government. Throughout this service, he has successfully improved state programs and operations while developing a well-known reputation for independence, integrity, and collaborative leadership.

“In the 1990s, Kelso worked with the California Judicial Council and Administrative Office of the Courts on a number of task forces and commissions. This work, particularly his efforts in support of unification of the state’s trial courts, led to his receipt of the 1998 Bernard E. Witkin Amicus Curiae Award, the highest honor given to an individual other than a member of the judiciary for outstanding contributions to California’s courts.

“In July 2000, Kelso was selected by then Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Governor Gray Davis as the interim replacement for outgoing Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush, who abruptly resigned amid allegations of corruption. Kelso’s leadership quickly restored public trust to the Department of Insurance.

“In June 2002, Governor Davis appointed Kelso to serve as the State’s Chief Information Officer and charged him with restoring the state’s crumbling information technology program. After Governor Davis’s recall, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger retained Kelso in the State CIO position. Focusing on the disciplines of strategic planning, collaborative execution, and workforce development, Kelso turned the state’s information technology (“IT”) program around, in two years moving the state from 47th to 12th in Brown University’s annual e-government report. In his State CIO role, Kelso also supported the development of state policies encouraging health information technologies and data sharing to improve quality, transparency, and accountability in public and private health care delivery systems. In recognition of his accomplishments, he received a “Top 25 Award for 2004 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers” from Government Technology and was named by Computerworld to their list of “Premier 100 IT Leaders for 2007.”

“A 1983 graduate of the Columbia University School of Law, Professor Kelso clerked for Judge Anthony M. Kennedy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Kelso joined the faculty at Pacific McGeorge in 1986 after practicing law briefly in the New York offices of Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler. A registered Republican, Kelso is married to Kari Kelso, Ph.D., and they have two daughters."

I checked with Kelso and he’s still a Republican.

Although Kelso’s motion requests that the judge hold Governor Schwarzenegger and State Controller John Chiang in contempt, he made it clear that he is getting cooperation from them and he is trying to work with them. He told the press club that the judge “wants me to work collaboratively with government agencies. He doesn’t want me coming back to court all the time saying ‘help me out here.’ So, I spend a lot of my time using the usual state process to convince the control agencies that they should reduce those obstacles.”

He explained why he brought this action, saying: “The Controller and the Governor’s belief is that absent an appropriation by the Legislature, they have not legal authority to do what I want them to do. So ultimately I had to bring a motion in the Federal Court that would hold the Governor and the Controller in contempt for failing to provide funding and seeking an order directing funding.”

Kelso also noted that the motion would not be heard until about September 22, which he said “give us, frankly, quite a bit of time to see if we can’t work out a settlement, and I’m hopeful that we will be able to work out a settlement fairly quickly.”

Governor Schwarzenegger has said “"Don't worry about any of that. Let's get the budget done, and everything will fall into place."

The problem is, however, that the legislature is scheduled to adjourn the end of this month. A bond, much more preferable to what the alternative is that Kelso is asking the courts to order, has to be approved by the legislature and by two-thirds in each house. Maybe they can take care of this in a special session—or maybe they can suck it up and revive SB 1665.

Controller Chiang had this to say about Kelso’s position:

“I understand Mr. Kelso is taking the steps he believes are necessary to fulfill his court-appointed duties, and I support his efforts to bring the State’s prison health care system up to Constitutional standards.

“However, my office cannot expend funds from the Treasury unless there is a legislatively-approved appropriation or a court order compelling payment. At this time, there is neither.

“One way or another, the State will have to pay for its prison healthcare system. I continue to believe the Legislature should approve lease revenue bonds as the fiscally appropriate way to fund prison bed construction and avoid interfering with my ability to responsibly manage the State’s cash flow and provide the services our State expects and deserves.

“I will continue to work with Mr. Kelso, who has assured me that there will be no immediate effect on the State’s cash flow. Once again, I call on the Legislature and Governor to take the necessary actions to pass a sound, workable budget and provide the Prison Receiver with the necessary resources to complete his charge.”

All of this should come to no surprise. We’ve been writing about this problem most of the two plus years we have been publishing. If you want to check some of our articles for the background on this, click here.

You can also watch a bit of what Kelso had to say in KCRA television coverage of his morning press conference. The Sacramento Press Club should have all of Kelso’s luncheon appearance on line for viewing shortly.

Kelso said about adding $3.1 billion to this year’s deficit: “I suspect it’s going to get some people’s attention by having that litigation pending.” I hope someone is paying attention, too.

Posted on August 14, 2008

Comments

I have been following this situation with great interest due to the fact I have two offenders in the state's prisons for killing my 12 year old grandson Chris Cejas.In fact one got 75 to life due to the three strike law, as he well should have.
However having said that I still find it fascinating that California has passed law after law with the intent of incarcerating just about anyone who steps a toe out of line. Now everyone is shocked that this "tough on crime" stance is coming home to roost with an 8 billion dollar price tag.

The health care problem and others would be more easily fixable if they were to change some sentencing guidelines, release non violent offenders while making use of home detention using GPS monitoring, and release terminally ill prisoners who are no longer a threat to anyone.

For too long our government has found it easier to pick our pockets rather than looking for good doable solutions that can cost less and do more. We The People must demand more out of our politicians. We must expect them to do what we do every day, make the best of what we have. Stretch a dollar. Only then will situations like these stop popping up.

Posted by: Pat Dazis at August 14, 2008 12:14 PM

The public cannot see the extent of the crisis because the media has been banned from being able to interview specific prisoners since 1996 so the news is blocked.

The public therefore cannot see the "need" as clearly as those who are witnessing this bloodbath where more than 400 prisoners are dying each year. The guess that one per week is only an estimate, due to the media ban, and careless double celling practices, the dead body count is probably much higher.

Those who are killed in prison did not have a death sentence. Those who are being mentally tormented will be released to our neighborhoods. The disease epidemics are communicable and ARE traveling out to the public. We're talking deadly diseases that have infected at least half the prisoners.

Hepatitis, TB, AIDS, MRSA, every scourge known to man. This is a public health crisis that should be an international embarrassment to every Californian, every American citizen.

The mentally ill are on the streets and it's past time to do something about these problems. Kelso is a Republican and even he is outraged over what he sees. Any person of conscience should be flaming angry and eager to comply.

We need mental hospitals to make up for decades of not having any after Reagan took away the funding for them, but it would be wise not to put them under the jurisdiction of CDCr. Nobody wants the prisons expanded, we need hospitals, but take CDCr's name off these efforts and everyone will be much more at ease.

The public is perceiving it as a prison expansion instead of what it is intended to be - a solution to a humanitarian crisis.

Posted by: Stephanie Gooding at August 14, 2008 12:36 PM

I agree with Pat Dazis and my heart goes out to her and her family. I have a 12 year old daughter myself.Her mother died when she was two. We visit my girlfriend who is serving 25 years to life for simple drug possession under three strikes.Her 3 priors came out of one case 10 years before when she was with a boyfriend that broke into 3 houses, thus three strikes 5 years before three strikes was enacted!She is not what the public imagined who would get caught up in this law!She has served 9 years already and I know the state would be better served if she were in drug rehabilitation! But CDCr rules say she is not eligable for the SAP program until the last two years of her sentence! She should be released as it cost$49,000 dollars to keep her in prison for drug possession!This is why our prisons are overcrowed and why the prison budget has skyrocketed!

Posted by: Frank Courser at August 19, 2008 04:42 PM

The release of nonviolent criminals is very important specialy those who are trying to introduce the other inmates to know the Lord for the first time of their life, giving them session of Bible studies.I beleive that these kind of inmates are no longer danger to the public, and they are thousand of this kind of inmates in our State prisons system.
They can be good Citizens and help more and more other people in the ouside and prevent a lot of crimes bazed on their experience inside the prison and save millions of dollars to the prison system.

Posted by: angele at August 19, 2008 11:45 PM

i am at large abscounding on parole due to the excesive violations proceedures by cdcr and returning parolees back to prison for hardly a reason. i served my time and some on parole but elderly people in my family had homes falling down due to wear and tear and would have been homeless if someone didn't help them. there was no one to help. i asked to get a pass to go help and was refused for no reason. so i had to violate my parole to help. now they want to give me a flat year when they get me due to leaveing the state to help elderly people and bed-ridden as well as alzheimers. i feel i should be given a chance but instead i have to stay out for another family members interest. i would go back now if it wasn;t for the overcrowding and horrible conditions in cdcr, and the fact that the violation i will have to serve in this case, is the same amount of time for attacking someone, or commiting a new offence with a deal.i did not do any of that,just helped out some old people in direr need. most of the prople in there are just there for stupid reasons and minor offences that where forced into takeing a deal, scared into it or are on drugs with no help in sight as the current programs are a joke. this current situation is chickens comeing home to roost for california not being realistic. i will be turning myself in after my family is taken care of and that will be very soon. with my current medical problims being given assistance by the V.A. hospital, (as i am a veteran with an honorable discharge) i know i wont be helped out when i return to prison. i served my time for the wrong i did but how many times do i have to serve it?
my original time was 3 years and i am a christian now helping others so my time was reduced to half. the first time for good behaveyor. and now no deal can be made? so i will be forced to almost the same time as i did originaly. with an overcrowded system california needs to take some lessons from other states and cut some people some breaks now and then......or pay up!....one way or another.get real! and get god, he will help the people not prison. well i guess you can't sweep your problims under the carpet after all! can you california?

jesus loves you.

runner
p.s. i would stop trying to take god and jesus out of the schools and public places, and quit trying to stop parents from spanking there kids if i were you.....just a thought. ha ha

Posted by: runner at September 9, 2008 02:06 AM

MONEY AND FENCES IS NOT THE ANSWER GIVE THESE PRISONERS HOPE THAT THEY CAN WORK JUST LIKE ANY ONE ELSE AND LIVE IN A DECENT HOME. THEY GET OUT AND THE PAROLE OFFICERS PUT THEM BACK IN THE GETTO BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT THEM TO HAVE A DECENT LIFE ONCE THEY DO SOMETHING WRONG THEY DONT DESERVE A CHANCE U HEAR ABOUT REHAB THAT IS A JOKE. ESPECIALLY FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO USE PUBLIC DEFENDERS JUST SIT IN A COURT ROOM THEN TELL ME IF JUSTICE IS FAIR

Posted by: LENA BORK at December 28, 2008 12:36 PM

MONEY AND FENCES IS NOT THE ANSWER GIVE THESE PRISONERS HOPE THAT THEY CAN WORK JUST LIKE ANY ONE ELSE AND LIVE IN A DECENT HOME. THEY GET OUT AND THE PAROLE OFFICERS PUT THEM BACK IN THE GETTO BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT THEM TO HAVE A DECENT LIFE ONCE THEY DO SOMETHING WRONG THEY DONT DESERVE A CHANCE U HEAR ABOUT REHAB THAT IS A JOKE. ESPECIALLY FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO USE PUBLIC DEFENDERS JUST SIT IN A COURT ROOM THEN TELL ME IF JUSTICE IS FAIR

Posted by: LENA BORK at December 28, 2008 12:37 PM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker