Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

New Fed Rules on Subprime Loans and Implications for California

Paul-Leonard-Testifying.jpg By Paul Leonard
California Office Director
Center for Responsible Lending

Today the Federal Reserve helped return the home lending industry to common-sense business practices by issuing new rules for mortgage lenders. We are pleased to see that the Fed has adopted some key protections for borrowers who receive subprime loans, including the following critical provisions:

• Requires that lenders evaluate a borrower's ability to repay a subprime loan, and verify income;

• Prohibits abusive prepayment penalties which trap borrowers in short-term subprime ARMs, and limits them for fixed loans;

• Requires the escrow of taxes and insurance for subprime loans.

The Federal Reserve did not, however, tackle all of the abuses that have troubled the mortgage lending market. It is unfortunate that the new rules do not cover the non-traditional (Alt-A) loans, such as payment-option ARMs, that have had a major hand in today's massive foreclosures.

Additionally, the Fed postponed addressing yield-spread premiums (YSPs)-the kickbacks that reward brokers for steering borrowers into costlier loans-which means that incentives to overcharge borrowers still exist. Although we are pleased the Fed recognized that its original disclosure-oriented broker rules were insufficient to curb abuses, we hope they will act quickly to tackle unfair yield spread premiums.

Implications for California

While many states have taken the lead in establishing new predatory lending standards, California legislators have not yet acted. New predatory lending legislation is now under discussion by California's legislative leadership, and we urge them to produce a bill that will complement and enhance the new federal rules.

State-regulated lenders originated 60 percent of California's subprime loans in 2006 [CRL calculations based on 2006 HMDA data]. California has the authority to issue tougher rules for the majority of subprime lenders that operate in the state, and, indeed, such stronger rules are necessary for the well-being and future of California's homeowners, communities and economy. Additionally, the Fed's new regulations will not take effect until October 2009; state legislation would take effect much sooner.

Fortunately, states have been leaders in responding to the problems in the mortgage market. More than a dozen, including New York, Connecticut and North Carolina, have passed strong legislation in recent months to curb the abuses in the subprime market. Much of this legislation goes further than the Fed rules-for example, New York, Connecticut and North Carolina ban all subprime prepayment penalties, not just those on subprime ARMs, while Maryland recently joined the list of states that bans prepayment penalties for all loans. Additionally, the North Carolina legislature unanimously passed legislation that would ban subprime yield spread premiums.

California-the nation's largest mortgage market and arguably the epicenter of the foreclosure crisis-is considering legislation this session that would ban or otherwise limit the use of YSPs. [According to RealtyTrac data, California's 2007 foreclosure rate of 1.9% (or one filing for every 52 households) ranked fourth in the nation, while the number of California foreclosure filings (481,392 on 249,513 properties) ranked first. RealtyTrac Press Release, "U.S. Foreclosure Activity Increases 75 Percent in 2007" (Jan. 29, 2008).]

• California should follow the lead of North Carolina and ban all subprime prepayment penalties and yield spread premiums.

• California also should take stronger actions to prohibit brokers from steering borrowers into higher cost loans.

• California should also provide additional protection to borrowers who are victims of predatory lending by allowing violations of predatory lending laws to be raised as a defense to a foreclosure action.

• Finally, given California's diverse population, California should require that non-English speakers be provided translations of essential mortgage documents when the mortgage is negotiated in a non-English language.

California is in the midst of a massive mortgage and housing crisis that could have been prevented had there been sensible rules in place at either the state or federal level. The FRB rules help, but we urge them to go further, both in scope, by covering all dangerous loans, and also in substance, as outlined above. In the interim, California should do its part to clean up a market that has spun out of control.

The Center for Responsible Lending is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and policy organization dedicated to protecting homeownership and family wealth by working to eliminate abusive financial practices.

Posted on July 14, 2008

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker