Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

California Knows: Offshore Drilling Doesn’t Make “Cents”

California-coast.gifBy Jim Metropulos
Legislative Representative
Sierra Club California

President George W. Bush’s July 14 Rose Garden announcement that he planned to open the nation’s coastline to offshore drilling had California’s leaders smelling a rat.

Later that morning, Senate President pro Tempore Don Perata (D-Oakland) took time during a morning press conference to say he hoped the California Legislature would bring “bipartisan resistance” to any offshore drilling proposal. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a statement reiterating his longtime view that “offshore drilling is not the answer.”

The places being suggested for new drilling have been deemed so special that Congress and consecutive presidents have protected them under an “Outer Continental Shelf” drilling moratorium since 1981.

California’s leaders and Sierra Club California know we can save more oil through energy efficiency than through drilling our precious coast. The Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) own data show that getting the first oil from currently protected areas would take at least a decade. Sadly, the amount of oil predicted at peak production in 20 years would still be too small to have any significant effect on oil prices.

In fact, Sierra Club California’s allies at the Natural Resources Defense Council have estimated oil prices would drop just 3 to 4 cents, if all of the offshore drilling that’s proposed takes place. And that’s at today’s gas prices!

Oil companies already hold some 5,500 offshore leases they aren’t even using. This March, companies spent a record $3.7 billion securing, according to the Minerals Management Service, a U.S. agency that tracks and manages mineral rights. The number of drilling permits on federal lands has doubled in the last five years while the price of gas almost tripled.

As another California leader, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, said yesterday morning, “It's time to tell the oil industry: ‘You already have millions of acres to drill. Use it or lose it.’” Her Senate colleague, California Sen. Barbara Boxer, already has around 10,000 Americans’ signatures on her petition against lifting the moratorium.

What’s more, Californians already are working on solutions. Conservation, alternative energy sources and technological advances represent cheaper, faster, cleaner, surer ways to meet America’s energy needs while reducing the threat of global warming. California already gets it: the California Air Resources Board is fighting the Bush Administration to protect our state’s Clean Car Law, written by then-Assemblywoman Fran Pavley (D-Santa Monica) which will improve the fuel efficiency of new cars to 43 miles per gallon in 2020. Meanwhile, the Bush Administration’s newest draft fuel efficiency standards only seek 35 mpg efficiency.

With the U.S. on track to use an estimated 21 million barrels of oil per day, the Bush Administration should be following California’s lead – not standing in its way. In court and in Congress, the administration continues to block and stall efforts to make realistic, achievable gains in energy efficiency and turn back what even President Bush has dubbed an “addiction to oil.”

I applaud California’s leaders in their efforts to protect the coasts and to lead the way. They won’t sell our serene coastal views cheaply for a quick, meaningless fix.

Jim Metropulos is a Senior Advocate at Sierra Club California, where he focuses on water and energy policy.

Posted on July 15, 2008

Comments

ohhh emmm geeee i have a fricken report on this subject and i dont like it no more

Posted by: christian at July 24, 2008 08:37 AM

You could not be more wrong on everything. I don't know where to begin. First the oil leases you mentioned are on marginal lands and currently your law suits have made them unprofitable which is your intent. Second alternative energy is not cheaper, not faster, and may not be cleaner. Someday alternative energy will be a reliable source but the technology is not there yet. You cannot change the laws of physics. Man-made global warming is a myth. I can demonstrate to you how the climate models used in these so-called studies are bogus and the data is minipulated. Drill now, create jobs and a steady energy supply. Use a growing economy to develop reliable alternative energy sources that are cost effective instead creating economic stagnation and job losses that we have now.

Posted by: Mark Fantozzi at February 16, 2009 07:33 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker