Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
California Assembly and Senate Conference Committee Passes Budget Bill: Floor Votes Presumably to be Scheduled
By Frank D. Russo
The Budget Conference Committee met late into the night and has finished reconciling the differences between the budget bills passed by the California Assembly and State Senate for the 2008-2009 fiscal year that has already started. While there were compromises made, and the conferees were congenial in yesterday’s meeting, as they have been throughout intense negotiations, many of the votes indicate that there is a partisan divide that cannot be entirely bridged. Paper piled up in front of the conferees reflecting their work and that of staff in drafting language and keeping track of the changing numbers in a detailed section by section drafting of the budget and accompanying trailer bills.
The conference committee has three members from each house. Two of the three members from each are from the majority party—Democrats. One from each house are Republicans. On many of the hundreds of votes taken by the conference committee, there were votes of 2-1 from the Assembly and Senate conferees, with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed.
Senate President pro Tem Don Perata (D-Oakland) and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) will hold a press conference this morning in the Capitol and many of the details will emerge with briefings by staff.
Here is a joint statement issued by the offices of Senator Perata and Assemblymember Bass at 9:30 p.m. yesterday evening after the committee finished its work:
The plan rejects the Governor’s deep cuts in education and health care and includes $9.7 billion in new revenue, which is $1.8 billion lower than what the Senate recommended and $2.7 billion more in new revenue than what the Governor proposed.
Democrats, the Governor, and even many Republicans know lawmakers can’t solve this year’s budget by cuts alone. The state has cut $12.3 billion during the last three budgets. Democrats know the fat is long gone, that a cuts-only approach would go deep into the bone of what the state provides.
There is no free lunch: Quality education, health care, fire protection and law enforcement all require additional revenue.
The Governor’s plan called for cuts in education that would force thousands of teacher layoffs, reduced spending in Medi-Cal and health care that would jeopardize medical service for all Californians and cutting in-home assistance for the elderly and disabled. The Governor’s plan would eliminate thousands of jobs at the worst possible time, when the economy is struggling.
Polls show Californians don’t want to cut education, shred the safety net, shutter parks or slash health care benefits. Cutting these services would hurt our economy in both the short- and long-term.
The Conference Committee budget is a balanced approach. It closes tax loopholes and rolls back tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy.
The Conference Committee budget restores money to education, health care and public safety thereby providing California the services it needs to bolster the economy and remain strong, livable and competitive in the 21st century.
On the expenditure side, the committee’s plan:
• Provides $2.3 billion more for K-12 education than the Governor recommended.
• Restores $1.5 billion in health and human services the Governor cut. This includes restoring nearly $200 million in health care services to some of the state’s most vulnerable residents, the reimbursement rate for Medi-Cal providers and federal pass-through funds for the aged, blind and disabled.
• Reduces corrections spending by $300 million with a reform package that helps lower the prison population.
• Restores $57 million in financial assistance for college students
On the revenue side, the committee’s plan:
• Reinstates the tax brackets on the wealthiest Californians by reinstating the 10% and 11% tax brackets. Revenue generated: $5.6 billion. California’s personal income tax rates ranges from 1 to 9.3 percent (for taxable income above about $93,000 for joint returns). An additional 1 percent rate applies to incomes about $1 million (that money supporters mental health programs under Prop 63). Under this budget, this proposal imposes a new rate of 10 percent for taxpayers filing joint returns with taxable income above $321,000 and 11 percent for those with incomes above $642,000. This is similar to what Republican Gov. Pete Wilson did in the 1990s.
• Closes a corporate tax loophole for large corporations. Revenue generated: $1.1 billion. California allows companies to carry forward a portion of losses (called Net Operating Losses, or NOL) incurred in one year and use them as a deduction against earnings in subsequent years. These tax breaks are used primarily by large corporations, many of them in the manufacturing and finance area. Companies with more than $5 million in gross receipts account for just 13 percent of total businesses but 80 percent of the NOL deduction. During an earlier fiscal crisis, this loophole was suspended. When the law was reinstated, the percentage of losses eligible to be carried forward was increased from 50 percent to 100 percent. The carry-forward period was also expanded to 10 years. The FTB estimates the value of NOL carried forward exceeded $260 billion as of 2006. The budget suspends the NOL for three years.
• Suspends a tax adjustment for upper-income Californians. Revenue generated: $815 million. In a year which the poor, elderly, and disabled aren’t getting cost-of-living increases for SSI/SSP and CalWORKS, the state shouldn’t be adjusting all of the tax tables for everyone else. Suspension of “indexing” would result in a proportional increase for taxpayers with incomes of up to $97,000 (joint returns), and a flat increase thereafter. As an example, a taxpayer with taxable income of $50,000 would pay about $34 more while a taxpayer with income exceeding $97,000 would pay about $180 more.
• Rolls back a tax loophole for upper-income Californians. Revenue generated: $215 million. Since 1997, taxpayers have received a nonrefundable income tax exemption credit for each dependent – regardless of their income. In 2007 this credit was $294. The LAO recommended making the dependent tax credit the same dollar amount as the personal exemption credit for all taxpayers. That credit was $94 for single taxpayers and $188 for couples. The Conference Committee proposal is a variation of the LAO recommendation. It would roll back the dependent credit for taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) that exceeds $150,000. As a result, it would protect the credit for lower and middle-income households.
• Restores the franchise tax. Revenue generated: $470 million. Virtually all companies are required to pay some amount of corporation tax. The top rate is now 8.84 percent. Prior to 1997, it was 9.3 percent. The Conference Committee proposal rolls back the 1997 tax cut, and restores the 9.3 percent rate.
• Steps up tax enforcement. Revenue generated: $1.5 billion. Modeled after successful tax amnesty efforts in the past, this proposal will collect taxes already owed to the state. Part of this revenue has been owed for years. Part will be an acceleration of revenues that would be paid in the future. This is one-time revenue.
Without revenue increases, the state would have to cut an additional $9.7 billion – about the amount it takes to run the state’s 33 prisons – and more than the cost of the entire UC system.
The Governor’s reduction to K-12 education is equivalent to a cut of $79 per student plus inflation, a step backward that Californians and their children cannot afford.
Comments
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 