Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

The Peculiar Response of Some Californians to Conserving Water

Surf-Putah.jpg By Wu Ming
Surf Putah


The Bee’s front page story on Thursday about Sacramento's water wasting habits certainly provoked a firestorm in the comments. Aside from the predictable right wing denunciations of water meters, conservation and - I kid you not - using brooms instead of hoses to sweep sidewalks, two familiar themes were "Hey, I moved here for the plentiful water" and "It's SoCal's problem, they steal our water."

Every drought, the old north-south battle over water, never very far from the surface, remerges with a vengeance. As a fourth generation northern Californian, it's probably pretty predictable which side I tend to fall on. Split the state and keep the water, I say (just so long as it's split south of here).

And yet, it cannot be denied that the combination of unsustainable abandoned-lawns-watered-at-noon suburban development in the Central Valley (especially up in the gold country exurban corridor, where houses rely on aquifers and rivers that old timers remember running dry in the last drought cycle), wasteful and careless personal water habits, and the continued use of outdated ag practices and climate-inappropriate crops have all conspired to make for an unreasonable level of water consumption in the Central Valley, with not all that much to even show for it.

I'm a strong believer in protecting the Delta and telling SoCal to deal with their water problems without stealing ours, but the flip side of that is acting responsibly with our water resources up here as well. We don't treat water like the precious resource that it is, and as a state we don't really consider the greater ecological costs of running the hydrological tank close to empty in good years, and past empty during drought. There ought to be a lot of ways in which we can continue to feed the state (and perhaps the nation and the world, but I'll admit the topic is worth discussing seriously, as produce and wine sent out of state is in essence water exported), there ought to be ways of greening our cities (Sac, Woodland and Davis are all justifiably proud of their urban forests, and all three cities save a significant amount of energy because of the shade they provide), and there ought to be ways of living comfortable lives without dumping water carelessly down the drain.

Some of it comes down to rediscovering all those good water habits that we learned during the last long drought. Some of it should probably be enforced through a metering system akin to how we pay for energy, not as a flat fee but relative to a household's use. With some planning, a lot can be done on the municipal and subdevelopment levels to recapture grey water for landscaping, and that landscaping probably ought to go a lot lighter on the decorative use of lawns and heavier on wildflowers, xeriscape and other pretty but drought tolerant plants.

Finally, and the funding for this probably would have to come from the federal level to a degree, if we want Central Valley farmers to go a bit easier on our region's water resources, we need to provide grants to upgrade irrigation equipment (and transition off of some crops that just have no business being grown there, although that whole issue is a lot more complicated to ag folks than it seems at first glance to suburbanites irritated at water restrictions, looking for scapegoats). In essence, we need to make more water by using less, but such mandates shouldn't come at the cost of bankrupting farmers, especially the smaller ones who won't have the capital to make such investments on their own.

Mostly, we need to realize that our collective behavior has got to improve a bit, and that while it's fine to denounce those SoCal/San Joaquin water thieves and their accursed aquaduct (why didn't anyone ever bother to cover that thing, BTW?), the Valley's got a long ways to go before we can claim to have removed the beam from our own eye.

As with oil, as with electricity, as with most things that we depend upon but don't value until they're almost gone, civilization depends upon a steady supply of water. We can't make rain fall from the sky, but we can make more out of thin air just by using it more intelligently. To do that, we have to get past this arrogant attitude that treats any common resource as something to be carelessly wasted and trashed, and any call for responsible behavior as fascist repression.

As with so many things, it's time for Californians to grow up about water. There is more than enough for a beautiful, comfortable state, but it has to be used intelligently, and we have to get past this attitude of waste as conspicuous consumption. Being upstream doesn't get us out of the responsibility to conserve our water.

And for god's sake, people, pick up a broom to sweep the sidewalk. Using a hose is like Homer Simpson opening beer cans with his gun; it's overkill. Besides, most of us need the exercise anyways.

Wu Ming is the nom de blog used by a graduate student in Yolo County at the site Surf Putah where this article originally appeared. This article is republished with his permission.

Posted on June 21, 2008

Comments

As a Southern Californian who lived in SF for a time during my early years here, I know the split in the state attitude. In fact, that's how Arizonians feel about all of California and the water we "share" from "their" Colorado river.

Until we recognize that we're all in this together and that EVERYONE MUST conserve resources, we continue to catapult down the environmental disaster circles of hell.

As our end of the state has literally FRIED this week in the 110+ range, I walk by door after open door from which air conditioning flows. This is at schools and public and office buildings. Thankfully, most homeowners are not quite as thoughtless since we pay exhorbitant DWP bills for our own homes. And, we pay the exhorbitant bills received by our schools and public facilities as they continue to waste, waste, waste.

If California wants to do something about the wasteful spending in our budgets, this would be an area to curtail. ###

Posted by: Linda Sutton at June 21, 2008 08:29 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker