Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Redistricting in California: Control or Democracy?
Steve Chessin
Member
California Democratic Party Executive Board
Bill Cavala is very selective in the Democrats he names as supporters of the Common Cause/League of Women Voters/AARP-backed redistricting initiative. He neglects to mention that both former Controller Steve Westly and former Governor Gray Davis support it, and neither of them has ever been on the losing end of a redistricting fight. Also, the California Democratic Council, "the conscience of the Democratic Party", supports the initiative (although certain California Democratic Party insiders are trying to get that undone before the November election).
The real issue is one of control. While it is egregious for elected officials to pick their voters before the voters get to choose their elected officials, most of those elected officials don't want to give up the control that being able to draw their own districts gives them.
(In fact, some years ago, in a slightly different context, I asked one of the Party insiders if he believed in democracy or if he believed in control. He was honest enough to tell me that he'd have to get back to me on that.)
Experience with redistricting reform in other states shows that it doesn't change much. A few districts become slightly more competitive, but most are safe for one party or the other just because of demographics. So why support redistricting reform if it won't change things much? Because it is egregious for elected officials to pick their voters before the voters get to choose their elected officials.
Appearances matter, and getting rid of this apparent (and real) conflict of interest will do much to restore the public's confidence in government.
Comments
Steve,
Do us all a favor and please join some other party. Those of us who are Democrats believe in a Democratic agenda -- and the way to get it is to win elections.
You've embraced an initiative which lists as its purpose "preventing the majority party from controlling redistricting."
You want to create a 14-member redistricting commission that under-represents Democrats. It hands over 5 seats to republicans -- more than their share of voter registration -- and 4 seats to independents -- more than their share of voter registration.
You think it's easy for Democrats to hold and build their majority? If you do, it's because -- unlike Cavala -- you've been watching from the sidelines. Years of experience have taught him something you've failed to learn -- it takes every tool we have to hold and build a Democratic majority. That's why the Republicans want this so bad -- and why the smart Democrats are saying NO.
Posted by: Please change your registration at June 19, 2008 09:15 AM
I think Gray would support any initiative that stripped the Legislatue of any authority.
Westlye may be sincere - or compiling press plaudits for his next run. But can he beat Jerry?
(who defeated him for Party Chair).
Posted by: cavala at June 19, 2008 10:12 AM
It's galling for "reform" proponents to pretend their proposal is neutral. The only completely neutral way to draw districts would be to have a computer design them using a random starting point and a random walk program. Whenever you introduce any factor other than total randomness, including the factors contained in the proposed reform, you are privileging some at the expense of others. And even a random-walk design would not be "fair"; it would simply be random in terms of who it was unfair to.
Since no one would ever agree to a random-walk program (because they could not foresee whose interests would suffer), the battle is not between fairness and unfairness, nor between "democracy" and "control," as the article suggests. It is simply a battle as to whose interests will prevail. In the end, you can't take the politics out of politics.
Posted by: David at June 19, 2008 11:34 AM
Dear "Please change your registration":
At least I have the courage to post using my real name, instead of hiding behind a string of words. It's anonymous attacks like yours that turn off so many people to politics, the very people we need to reach in order to maintain and increase our majority.
You obviously don't know the hard work I've done for the Santa Clara County Democratic Party, helping turn the 14th CD (nee the 12th) from red to blue, making Santa Clara County (at least for a while) a Republican-free zone, or producing our public access television show DTV for 13 years.
I'm sure you've worked hard too, but to post your accomplishments you'd have to come out into the open, and I guess that's just not your style.
Posted by: Steve Chessin at June 19, 2008 02:25 PM
Hmmm. That DTV link is supposed to point to http://www.sccdp.org/dtv.php, but for some reason it didn't take. The one in this comment does work, however. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Posted by: Steve Chessin at June 19, 2008 02:37 PM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 