Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Cavala: More Fallacious Arguments on Prop 11 – The Governor’s Redistricting Scheme Debunked
- Seeing Through the Blue Shield Smokescreen: Drug Switching Most Certainly Does Place Minorities at Risk
- California is Not Alone in Budget Crisis and Credit Crunch Caused by National Economic Meltdown
- Proposition 2: Views Fit to Print
- Cavala: L.A. Times Columnist Wrong About Public Input into Legislative Redistricting
- Coalition of “EVERYONE” Launches No on 10 Campaign
- High-Speed Rail: Californians and Americans Just Don’t Know What We’re Missing
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Discrimination in Individual Health Insurance Market Demonstrates Need for California Legislation and Calls into Question McCain’s Health Plan
By Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California
The scrutiny on the inefficient, iniquitous individual insurance market continues, with David Lazarus' column in the Los Angeles Times.
We've explored before how women get discriminated against in the individual insurance market. They have to pay significant surcharges for maternity coverage. A recent NY Times story spotlighted how a C-section can be classified as a pre-existing condition that leads to higher premiums or a denial of coverage.
But now the California insurance marketplace had come full circle: Lazarus reports that three insurers: Aetna, Blue Cross, and now Blue Shield are charging men and women differently, and others are now looking to go there as well.
Where does it stop? As Lazarus says:
“But parsing rates according to gender is a relatively new phenomenon. If women are more expensive than men to insure, and middle-aged women are significantly more expensive than middle-aged men, what about, say, older women with red hair? After all, they have fairer skin and thus are more susceptible to skin cancer.
“How about if, statistically speaking, blacks are more expensive to insure than whites? Or Christians more expensive to cover than kosher-observing Jews?
“How far will insurers go in determining risks?”
This may be a standard insurance practice, but I think the public realizes that this is unacceptable social policy to have such discrimination, against women or any other group.
We should pass bills like AB 1962(De La Torre) to require maternity as a basic benefit; institute guaranteed issue in the individual insurance market so that those with "pre-existing conditions" can get coverage; and fundamentally reform the health system to expand group coverage and shrink the individual market--where women and others are subject to discrimination, in multiple ways.
One last point: I keep reading that McCain is interested in appealing to women voters, but how can he explain to them his health plan, which would shift millions into the individual market, where they are likely to be discriminated against?
Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has also been published on the Health Access Weblog.
Comments
Individual health insurance coverage is a matter of concern these days. basically the topic in this post is especially showing the importance for a health insurance for expected moms. I do appreciate the thought.
Posted by: Fredrick Edwin at July 7, 2008 10:36 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 