Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- How would McCain's and Obama's Policies Affect the States - Part 1
- Arnold's Freedom to Choose: Subprime Lending Regulation and the Bubble in California
- California and the Nation’s Financial Mess: It’s About Transparency
- Conservatives Should Be Appalled by the Iraq War and the Administration’s Other Self-Destructive Policies on Terror
- Regarding California’s Deadliest Train Collision: What Was Learned and Done Thus Far and What May Lay Ahead
- Three Overlapping Seats Winnable in Central California Blue Wave: Congress, State Senate, and Assembly
- Taking a Close Look at Prop 4, Californians Will Vote No—As They Have Two Times When Similar Measures Were on the Ballot
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Clean Elections for U.S. House and Senate Moving Forward--California Congressional Delegation Will Play Pivotal Role

By Rob Arnow
Common Cause
Most of us have particular issues that motivate and inspire us to action. To be effective, we often have to pick and choose carefully where to put our precious time and resources. But this can leave us isolated from one another on any particular issue. As a result we are often unable to achieve the critical mass to move our individual causes forward.
But often there are systemic issues obstructing progress that, when fixed, help push many important causes forward in a single bound. Uniting on these fronts is an essential component in winning on our various individual policy efforts.
“Clean Elections,” or “full public campaign financing,” appears to be one of these issues. The concept is simple: candidates who can demonstrate a wide base of public support by collecting a large number of $5 donations, and who agree to not accept any other private donations (with the exception of a strictly regulated amount of “seed money”), receive enough public funding to run a competitive campaign. This frees up elected officials to focus exclusively on the public good, rather than feeling pressure to give inappropriate favors and access to big-money contributors.
While Clean Elections is very exciting on local and state levels, it would be groundbreaking on a federal level – nowhere are Clean Elections more needed than in U.S. House and Senate elections. Promisingly, a bill along these lines has been introduced in the Senate: the bipartisan Fair Elections Now Act (S.1285), authored by Assistant Senate Majority Leader Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA). A companion bill in the House, authored by Rep. John Larson (D-CT), is expected shortly.
Barack Obama was one of the earliest co-sponsors of this bill, and John McCain appeared in television commercials on behalf of Clean Elections in Arizona. The strong likelihood of having a president in favor of Clean Elections means that the Fair Elections Now Act has a genuine chance of passage under the next administration.
Right here in California, we have a tremendous opportunity, and responsibility, to affect the outcome of this bill. The bill begins its journey in the Rules and Administration Committee in the Senate, of which Dianne Feinstein is the Chair. She hasn’t taken a position yet, and the opinions of other elected officials, activists, businesspeople, and regular citizens will be very important to her in how she comes down on the issue.
Of course, House Speaker Pelosi will also be very important. While her support of this bill is very likely, displays of public support will only help to remind her of the importance of this bill and of championing reform.
While groups across California and the U.S. fight for health care reform, environmental sustainability, and a quality educational system, their efforts are frequently stymied by the influence of big money in politics. Meanwhile, the playing field in places with Clean Elections—like the states of Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut—has leveled and citizens no longer face an uphill battle in getting the government to respond to the needs of the public.
While Californians fight for health care reform against the powerful hand of the insurance industry, in Maine, where 84% of the state legislature was elected in the last cycle without taking a dime from special interests, the state was able to pass the nation’s first universal health care program.
Maine State Senate President Beth Edmonds said, "When I'm walking the halls of the legislature and I see lobbyists from major corporations or even small organizations, I know that I get to make decisions that think about all the people in my constituencies, all the people in my district and not just specific interest groups.”
Meanwhile, in Arizona, another Clean Elections state, a coalition of Republican moderates and Democrats in the legislature were able to pass a groundbreaking budget in 2004 that guaranteed all-day kindergarten for more than 150 of the state’s poorest schools, increased funding for community colleges, and provided financial help to thousands of working families in need of child care. Twenty-six of the 31 votes needed to pass the budget in the Assembly came from Clean Elections candidates and supporters.
Also in Arizona, Governor Janet Napolitano, a Clean Elections candidate, signed an executive order on her first day in office establishing prescription drug subsidies for seniors. Governor Napolitano said in a speech later that year, “If I had not run clean, I would surely have been paid visits by numerous campaign contributors representing pharmaceutical interests and the like, urging me either to shelve that idea or to create it in their image. All the while, they would be wielding the implied threat to yank their support and shop for an opponent in four years.”
Clean Elections for U.S. congressional campaigns could mean a long-term transformation in how politics works in the United States: making politicians accountable to the public interest rather than special interests; ensuring electoral outcomes based on the merits and ideas of the candidates rather than their fundraising abilities; and giving the politicians the opportunity to spend more time focusing on policy and their constituents, rather than dialing-for-dollars.
The danger of failing to focus on systemic issues is not the risk of losing; rather, it’s the risk of winning changes in the short-term – say, health care reforms or greenhouse gas emissions caps – that will have difficulty withstanding the withering pressures of special interest money over the long term. With the Fair Elections Now Act moving forward in the halls of Congress, we have an opportunity to remove that pressure for good.
Please visit www.commoncause.org/fairelectionsnow to find out more or contact Rob Arnow at info@voterownedelections.org to get more involved or with any questions.
Rob Arnow ran the successful effort to create a system of partial public campaign financing for the San Francisco mayoral race in 2005. He currently works for Common Cause, building support in the Bay Area and California for the Fair Elections Now Act.
Comments
If you are trying to promote fair elections, why do you carry libelous, mudslinging ads like the one about "The Real Barak Obama" in the box to the right of your text???
Posted by: Kelly at June 15, 2008 01:23 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 