Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
California Voters Roundly Defeat Landlord Backed Prop 98 and Pass Environmental Proposition 99 on Eminent Domain
By Frank D. Russo
With just under 40% of the day of election precinct ballots counted, Proposition 98, placed on the ballot by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and bankrolled heavily by landlords in California is going down to a resounding defeat. It has the support of 42% of the votes counted and is being rejected by 58% of the vote. A map of the state shows it being defeated in all the major populous counties of California—including Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Clara, and San Francisco—with the possible exception of Orange County where it is leading with just over 50% of the vote.
Voters at the same time have passed Proposition 99, an alternative measure dealing with eminent domain favored by the environmental community, local governments, and other groups. It is receiving over 64% of the vote and passing in all counties with the exception of Colusa County.
The Associated Press has called the election on these initiative measures, the only Propositions on the June California primary election. It appears that turn out at polling places on Election Day was very light and that the vote by mail ballots—for the most part already counted—mean that significantly more than half of all the ballots have already been counted.
In response to voter rejection of Proposition 98 and support of Proposition 99 today, representatives of the No on 98 / Yes on 99 campaign issued the following statements this evening:
Tom Adams, board president, California League of Conservation Voters said: “We’re very, very grateful to the voters. The voters saw that Proposition 98 was a deceptive initiative, in fact, the worst kind of ballot abuse where a populist issue is used to conceal an attack on renters, the environment, homeowners and our communities. The voters have rightfully become very skeptical about the fine print hidden in initiatives.
“By passing Proposition 99, voters have enacted ironclad protections against the misuse of eminent domain. Proposition 99 drives a stake through the heart of devious ballot measures like Proposition 98 and, before that Proposition 90. Thankfully, I don’t think we will see a repeat of those efforts.
“Twice now - with the defeat of Prop. 90 in 2006 and Prop. 98 tonight - voters have rejected fraudulent initiative schemes by special interests. Despite the fact that landlords spent nearly $8 million to fool the voters about Prop 98, the voters once again showed that they see these cheesy schemes for what they are. Hopefully, this will send a strong signal to others that the voters have little tolerance for dishonest tactics.”
Janis Hirohama, president, League of Women Voters of California said: “Voters saw through the deceptive ads. They rejected Prop 98 because it would have been devastating for renters, homeowners, our environment, and our entire state. This should send a strong signal to anyone thinking of using the initiative process to sneak harmful agendas past voters.”
Hirohama continued: “By supporting Prop. 99, voters clearly said they support straightforward and powerful eminent domain reforms that don’t contain hidden agendas.”
The passage of Prop 99, which protects homeowners, and the sound defeat of Proposition 98 may be the end of eminent domain issues on the California ballot. Voters have previously defeated a prior eminent domain measure—Proposition 90-- backed by out of state interests and anti-government groups by a more narrow margin.
Comments
Thanks to everyone for your hard work on this campaign! I work with elders and could not imagine how devastating prop 98 would have been for them.
Posted by: oaklandgirl at June 3, 2008 11:47 PM
"The passage of Prop 99, which protects homeowners, and the sound defeat of Proposition 98 may be the end of eminent domain issues on the California ballot."
Let me tell you something: IT WON'T. Once the abuses still occur on small business, churches, rentals, and farms, we will be right back to where we started, except this time I hope we can get a straight Kelo
Posted by: Ben at June 4, 2008 09:16 AM
Thank you California voters for once again showing your support for rent control.
The defeat of Prop 98 was a resounding victory for rent control and renters' rights. The landlords who funded the Prop 98 campaign weren't interested in eminent domain reform. They wanted to abolish rent control and renter protections.
The fight against Prop 98 has reinvigorated the renters' rights movement in California. Activists have launched Tenants Together, the first statewide renters' rights organization in decades. Renters! Join the movement!
http://www.tenantstogether.org
Posted by: AndyRenter at June 5, 2008 04:49 PM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 