Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- As Another Special Session on Budget Looms, Senator Asks if California Can “Bail Out Ourselves” By Retirement System Purchase of State’s Short-Term Debt
- Schwarzenegger Thinks Jerry Brown Has Best Shot at Being Next California Governor if Obama Wins Presidency
- Governor Schwarzenegger Should Call Special Session on California’s Mortgage and Foreclosure Crisis Linked to Our Budget Problems
- If It Were up To Them We’d Still Be in the Depression
- Schrag: The Problems with Prop 4 on Parental Notification
- With Friends Like New York Times Columnists Thomas Friedman, Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich – Does Barack Obama Need Enemies?
- California Budget Crisis – Again-- Possible Special Session on State Budget
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Big News in Today’s Field Poll: Boxer Positioned for Re-election
By Frank D. Russo
The California Field Poll released today shows that Barbara Boxer enjoys a net positive 17 point rating from California’s registered voters on their approval of her job performance. Field has the numbers at 48% approval and 31% disapproval with 21% having no opinion. Looking at the breakdown by party registration, Boxer does well with Democrats (70% to 12%) and does poorly with Republicans (20% to 62%). Most importantly, she does well with “non-partisan/others”—independent voters by 44% to 24%.
Boxer’s numbers are the big news from the Field Poll—as she is up for re-election in 2010—and even now there is much discussion about that race. Although much will be written about what the numbers say about Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein that were covered in today’s release, Pelosi runs in her San Francisco District and Feinstein is not up until 2012 and may or may not not run for re-election. We’ll return to Boxer after a brief look at these other numbers. What is surprising about Boxer’s numbers is that they are statistically the same (off by one percent) as those of Feinstein who is ever popular with California voters and coasts to re-election year after year. That is a good change for her, as she has usually trailed Feinstein’s high numbers by some degree.
Field also asked California voters of their opinions of Nancy Pelosi’s job performance as Speaker of the U.S. House and found them to be negative with 30% approval and 39% disapproval. A full 31% have no opinion. I’m not sure of the relevance of this question unless Pelosi is planning on running for statewide office. She is popular with voters in her San Francisco District. She just won her Democratic primary with 89% of the vote against a challenger. Statewide, there is a partisan split with Democrats approving (47% to 23%) than Republicans disapproving by a large margin (16% to 62%) and non-partisan/others disapproving (18% to 37%) with a very high 45% of these independent voters having no opinion one way or the others.
No doubt Pelosi gets backwash from California voters’ opinions about Congress, and there is disappointment by many with grid lock in that body and frustration by those on the left with her failure to end the War in Iraq, but if you look at the crosstabs of the poll published by the Sacramento Bee there appears to be a straight correlation with more liberal voters approving and conservative voters disapproving in the small numbers of voters in each of these subcategories.
Feinstein enjoys a 48% to 32% approval rating and has been at this level in the last three polls by Field. If you look at the range she has hovered in since Field first asked Californian about her in 1993, they are remarkably consistent. She had better ratings—really sky high in early and middle 2007 and the worst that she ever did in those 15 years was to get a 50% approval and 40% disapproval rating in 1995. And she does well with Democrats and non-partisan/others, and not so badly with opposition party Republicans, getting 2*% approval and 51% disapproval from them.
Boxer’s numbers are, if anything, slightly better than Feinstein’s with Democrats where she has a net positive 58 ponts. She does well with the non-partisan/others—44% to 24%, not quite as well as Feinstein’s 47% to 31%. And her numbers are not as good as Feinstein’s with the state’s Republicans, but they are better than many Democrats fare with the minority party.
Here’s the key: If you look back at the Field Poll ratings before the Boxer re-elects in 1998 and 2004, she was polling in the mid-40s, but ended up winning both of them.
Filed polled in October 2007 and pegged Boxer in a hypothetical race with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. The result, at a time when Schwarzenegger had a high 56% to 32% rating and was one of the most popular elected figures in California was a statistical tie: 44% Schwarzenegger and 43% Boxer. Since then, Schwarzenegger’s numbers have tanked.
So today’s improvement for Boxer since the October 2007 Field poll results of 44% approval and 35% disapproval (a net plus 9 points) to today’s net 17 points is significant.
Californians have watched Senator Boxer over the years and know--or will be reminded-- that she doesn’t back down from a fight. Whether it’s going after the Bush Environmental Protection Agency, the War in Iraq, or taking care of California’s interests, she is a fighter. She’s is well positioned with an increasingly Democratic set of voters in California to be ready for whichever Republican decides to run.
Boxer’s grassroots base is exceptionally committed to her. Over 250,000 people are on her email list. She has a direct mail donor base of nearly 100,000 grassroots donors. (About 80% of her contributions are $100 and under.) Both of those lists are growing, even 3 years before the election. Last year, at an event featuring Al Gore just before he won his Nobel Prize, progressives nationally and in the state showed they are committed to keeping her in the Senate by not only refilling her coffers, but showing up in person.
This strong base gives her an edge going into any tough race and she can focus on talking to those voters in the middle who need to be reminded of her record of accomplishment.
Comments
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 