Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

The Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act on the November California Ballot

Wayne-Pacelle.jpg By Wayne Pacelle
President and Chief Executive Officer
Humane Society of the United States

Americans could barely believe their eyes when shown the sickening mistreatment of downer cows at a Southern California slaughter plant earlier this year. An investigator for The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) went undercover there and documented ailing dairy cows unable to walk being brutalized in order to get them into the slaughter area. Government inspectors and plant management either missed the abuse or allowed it to go on. After the disturbing video came to light, criminal charges were filed against plant workers, the nation’s largest-ever meat recall was initiated, and then the U.S. Agriculture Secretary announced on May 20th that his agency would no longer allow the meat from downer cattle onto our food plates.

This investigation shows us we cannot always wait for the government and the leaders of the factory farming industry to protect animals from abuse or to guard us from food safety threats. That’s why a coalition including The HSUS and other animal protection groups, veterinarians, environmentalists, family farmers, and food safety advocates led an effort in which nearly 800,000 Californians signed petitions to place an anti-cruelty ballot initiative on the November 2008 ballot.

The principle behind the ‘Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act’ is simple: All animals deserve humane treatment, including those raised for food. Specifically, the measure seeks to afford animals raised for food the opportunity to turn around and extend their limbs. It will prevent three of the worst factory farming abuses: veal crates for young male calves, gestation crates for breeding pigs, and battery cages for egg-laying hens.

It is cruel and inhumane to confine animals throughout their lives in cages or crates so small that they cannot turn around or stretch their limbs. On factory farms, veal calves are chained by the neck and confined in tiny stalls; pigs are kept in metal cages called gestation crates that are barely larger than their bodies; and several hens are crammed into a battery cage with each bird having less floor space than a letter-sized sheet of paper. Confining animals in these cages and crates is worse than you or I being forced to live in a middle airplane seat for our entire lives.

The greatest nation in the world, with the world’s most innovative farmers, can do better than these severe confinement systems. Family farmers know food quality is enhanced by more humane farming methods, and they know there is a balance between animal care and economics. And increasingly major retailers like Wolfgang Puck, and even Burger King are demanding more humanely-produced products and phasing in the sale of products from farmers who do not confine animals in tiny cages.

The prestigious Pew Commission on Industrial Animal Production – an independent panel chaired by former Kansas Governor John Carlin and that included former U.S. Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman and leading veterinarians and farmers – recently issued a report about the state of animal agribusiness in America and said the California ballot measure includes “the types of modest animal welfare public policy improvements that the Commissioners recommend implementing.” In its report, the Commission said, “Practices that restrict natural motion, such as sow gestation crates, induce high levels of stress in the animals and threaten their health, which in turn may threaten human health.” It’s also on the basis of human health concerns that the Center for Food Safety and the Union of Concerned Scientists have also endorsed the California ballot measure.

Arizona and Florida voters approved ballot initiatives to phase out these types of crates. And lawmakers in Colorado and Oregon have done the same. The European Union has already passed legislation against veal crates, barren battery cages, and gestation crates, and these regulations now apply to all of its 27 nations – which now represent more than 450 million people.

These modest reforms won’t be costly to implement. The egg industry’s own California-based economist reports that producing cage-free eggs costs less than one penny per egg more. According to California’s Legislative Analyst, the fiscal impact of this initiative is limited to minor costs that will be offset by revenue from fines. This ballot measure gives farmers until 2015 -- a full six years -- to phase in more humane production practices.

Reducing the immense suffering that factory farming inflicts on animals is simply a matter of common decency. And cramming animals into giant factory farms is bad for the environment and for human health. Vote “yes” this fall on the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act.

Wayne Pacelle is president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States.

Posted on May 29, 2008

Comments

This modest measure will alleviate some of the suffering that 19 million animals endure each year while confined to tiny cages and crates across California. It's the least we can do to give these animals the ability to turn around and extend their limbs. I'm looking forward to voting YES on The Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act. Join me, volunteer, and learn more at www.HumaneCalifornia.org.

Posted by: Heather C at May 29, 2008 08:36 AM

This modest measure will alleviate some of the suffering that 19 million animals endure each year while confined to tiny cages and crates across California. It's the least we can do to give these animals the ability to turn around and extend their limbs. I'm looking forward to voting YES on The Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act. Join me, volunteer, and learn more at HumaneCalifornia.org.

Posted by: Heather C at May 29, 2008 08:38 AM

These animals on factory farms suffer the worst abuses. It is a no-brainer that it is exceptionally cruel to stuff animals into small cages that don't even allow them to turn around or stretch their limbs, let alone walk. I hope you will join me in making these animal's lives a bit more bearable and voting YES on the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act this November.

Posted by: Hana L. at May 29, 2008 09:36 AM

It is inhumane and unnecessary to force animals to spend their entire lives confined in restrictive cages where they are barely able to move. Sadly, this is what nearly 20 million animals on factory farms in California currently have to endure. I am thrilled that this November, Californians will have the opportunity to improve the lives of these animals by voting YES on the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act! More information can be found at: www.HumaneCalifornia.org.

Posted by: Karin O. at May 29, 2008 09:51 AM

As a volunteer who collected signatures for the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act, I am so happy to see it will be on this November's ballot! Kudos to everyone who made this happen- it is about time that these poor animals on factory farms get treated with an ounce of respect. Be sure to vote YES!

Posted by: Walker P. at May 29, 2008 10:40 AM

This initiative is a basic, common sense anti-cruelty law that will give farm animals enough space to turn around. Remember to vote YES in November!!!

Posted by: Kath Rogers at May 29, 2008 07:05 PM

Californian voters have the opportunity to reduce the suffering of 20,000,000 animals by phasing out severe confinement systems in which animals cannot lie down, turn around or extend their limbs. If you have compassion within you, you will vote YES on the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act which will be on the November ballot. For more information go to www.humanecalifornia.org

Posted by: Ronnie S at May 29, 2008 07:13 PM

It really is time. Animals are alike in suffering and can undergo both physical and mental pain.
This is abuse anyway you cut it. Noone should want to be a part of this despicable chain- and if you consume meat or animal prodcuts we should all be responsible & humane consumers.

Posted by: Mary W. at May 29, 2008 09:16 PM

It is cruel and inhumane to tolerate the suffering of any animal. Collectively, we must take a stand for the respect and dignity of animals as it is a direct relationship of how we treat each other.

To allow this kind of abuse to continue is unacceptable. We are better than this because a nation without compassion has nothing.

Posted by: Rosy Morales at May 30, 2008 10:08 AM

It's time we speak up for those who have no voice. Stop allowing agribusiness to abuse animals and to deceive the public about the immense suffering caused.

Posted by: Meredith M. at May 30, 2008 02:27 PM

no these animals have a voice

we are their voice

we need to stop this for good

Posted by: Bryant at June 2, 2008 10:42 PM

no these animals have a voice

we are their voice

we need to stop this for good

Posted by: Bryant at June 2, 2008 10:43 PM

There is no veal farming in California and almost no breeding pigs, so what is this proposal aimed at? Laying hens.

It may come as news to some people, but most folks understand that birds flock. Even when they are placed in a massive space, their natural instinct is to band together tightly in groups causing them to not be able to extend their wings. If the group panics, they crush each other like people trying to rush out of a crowded theater.

Cages provide laying hens with controlled flocking. If you remove the cages, the incidence of broken bones in the birds instantly doubles. Double the rate of broken bones may be some people’s definition of progress or improved animal welfare, but it isn’t mine.

Posted by: Joe at June 6, 2008 12:13 PM

Though HSUS did a good thing by exposing the abuse at the slaughter plant, I still worry about the group. It seems that American Humane Society and American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals are the groups most directly involved with supporting local shelters.

Maybe that is the reason many local shelters are distancing themselves from HSUS. For those interested in doing some independent research, they should check out what their local shelters and other groups have to say about HSUS, its lack of support for shelters, and whether it is more concerned about animal welfare or expanding its sphere of influence.

Posted by: Molli at June 6, 2008 12:46 PM

I meant to say American Humane Association not American Humane Society.

Posted by: Molli at June 6, 2008 01:35 PM

To Molli: The HSUS does many things for local shelters. It provides disaster assistance. It fundraises for local shelters via, for example, "Walk for Animals" and "Spay Day USA". They operate sanctuaries across the U.S. They operate the Rural Area Veterinary Services (RAVS) which provides no-cost medical care to dogs and cats across the nation and globe that are typically not served by vets. And lastly, expanding their "sphere of influence" means to celebrate the animal/human bond and confront cruelty. And that's a wonderful thing! Yes on the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty.

Posted by: Jesse at June 9, 2008 07:30 PM

To Bryant, how do you base your notions on chicken behavior? Here are just a few links, most of which are from doctors and scientists, who give a much more accurate description of how chickens really act. Nowhere does it state that they can "crush each other like people trying to rush out of a crowded theater." lol

http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/animals/chickens/

http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/research/welfare/scientists_and_experts_on_battery_cages.html

http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/research/practices/comparison_hen_welfare_cages_vs_cage_free.html

http://www.hsus.org/farm/camp/nbe/compare.html

Posted by: Sophie at June 9, 2008 08:36 PM

Bryant

Have you ever owned any chickens? For a person who has you sound like an extreme fool. I have never seen chickens, or any birds for that matter, behave as you describe. Even when they flock there is always a good amount of space between them. They always leave space to move around, to spread their wings.

And what makes you think that roaming chickens are going to automatically fracture all their bones? Just because they have more space? Are you drunk or something?

Posted by: Shumila at September 27, 2008 02:06 AM

Keeping these chickens in cages their whole life is cruel. They can't even move! It would be like an elevator full of people for 14 months!

Posted by: Christine at September 28, 2008 08:45 AM

Keeping these chickens in cages their whole life is cruel. They can't even move! It would be like an elevator full of people for 14 months!

Posted by: Christine at September 28, 2008 08:46 AM

Keeping these chickens in cages their whole life is cruel. They can't even move! It would be like an elevator full of people for 14 months!

Posted by: Christine at September 28, 2008 08:48 AM

Hello, my name is Jennifer Benelli and I participate in the S.W.A.P program here in Humboldt County CA. I got a DUI a couple of years back and instead of doing time I am working my time off at a farm that is run by the Humboldt County Sheriffs department. I do not work with chickens, but I do care for alot of pigs and cows. I really would like some advice on who I could contact that could help to improve the lives of these animals. I know that they are being raised for food, but the way they are cared for while they are alive is terrible. The majority of the pigs live out their lives in cement pins. They have no access to the outdoor elements and are fed nothing but roten food. The cops breed the pigs here as well and in my time here over the last year and a half I have seen only one piglet survive. They keep the pregnant mothers in tiny tiney farrowing creates that no where near accommadate the 5- 750 pound preganante pigs, but they shove them in there anyways. The pregnant pigs are provided with very little grain and no slop, and the last pregnant mother i saw was barly able to stand up to get water. Needless to say that pig died trying to give birth to her babies. The Shariff that is in charge of the farm told us to just burrie her, wether the babies were still alive or not. The previous litter born only 2 weeks ago had no survivores. The cows that I care for are provided with barly any food a dry pitiful pasture, and they have no shelter. I do not know what your wether conditions are like, but here in Humboldt after November it does nothing but rain until April and they have no way to get out of it. I would like to know if there is anyone I could contact that could help improve the care provided to these poor animals. If so PLEASE CONTACT ME AT THE E-MAIL LISTED ABOVE. I appricate your love of animals and truely hope that you can help me find a way to stop the inhumane treatment of these animals that I help to care for.

Posted by: Jennifer Benelli at November 17, 2008 08:00 AM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker