Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

New Nestle Contract Seen as Opportunity for McCloud

Protect-Our-Waters.gif By the McCloud Watershed Council

Nestlé’s announcement that it will reduce the size of its planned water bottling plant in McCloud and reopen its contract with the McCloud Community Services District is welcome news. While it is not certain that this scaled back project is right for our town, it does provide a great opportunity for McCloud: to ensure that we fully evaluate the risks of a proposed plant to the health of our watershed; to understand what a fair price for our water would be; and to lay the groundwork for long-term economic vitality in our community.

The McCloud Watershed Council is steadfastly pro-McCloud and appreciates the tremendous support that we have received from the community, public officials and other organizations over the years. Any concerns the Council has expressed about the Nestlé plant have stemmed from deficient public process, the grossly inadequate price to be paid for McCloud's water ($115 per 1.5 million gallons a day), and dramatically insufficient scientific study of environmental impacts.

The company’s recent decision to enter into a new contract gives the District Board a second chance to explore the idea of a water bottling plant the right way – with real public process, good science, and sound economic analysis of its likely impact on our community.

Ever since Nestlé proposed the idea of reducing the proposed size of the plant, people in town have been asking each other whether they are “for” or “against” the new proposed facility. But anyone engaging in these discussions is falling into the same trap the District fell into when the plant was first proposed. No one – not even Nestlé – should support a plant of any size absent comprehensive scientific understanding of how water extraction might affect our river, streams and economy.

As McCloud residents, we also need to know how a plant might affect our quality of life, including traffic, air quality, noise, toxics, and historical preservation. To make a judgment on the merits of a plant without that information would be like agreeing to buy a house without having it inspected. It may look good from the outside, but wouldn’t you want to know about hidden costs before signing on the dotted line?

McCloud is fortunate to have a sufficient supply of pristine spring water. Not every town in America is so lucky these days. With population increases and rising global temperatures, we’re already hearing about whole regions where water is in short supply. Water is McCloud’s greatest economic asset. It is our liquid gold and the current contract virtually gives this treasure to Nestlé at a price of $42,000 per year.

After all the scientific studies are done, we as a community can use that information to make a more responsible decision. Should we decide to sell our water, we should make sure we are paid a fair market rate. The current contract gives our water away for a small fraction of what bottlers like Nestlé are paying in almost any other community in the country. Setting aside the current contract gives the community a chance to negotiate a fair market price for our pure spring water.

The Council commissioned an economic study to understand how water bottling plants have traditionally affected small-town economies. Clearly, the report shows that our water is undervalued as both a resource and an important attractor to our area. McCloud has been a one-company town before, and when logging dried up so did the majority of jobs. Perhaps a large water-bottling plant is not the right answer. We should take the time to carefully evaluate our options.

Fortunately, the community now has a chance at a “do-over” with Nestlé. The company has finally opted to engage in the scientific study of water based environmental impacts. By acknowledging that the existing contract is for a previous project Nestlé is no longer considering, and that a new contract is needed, Nestlé has recognized that McCloud can reconsider whether it wants to sell its water, and if so, to do so on economic terms that are fair to McCloud.

The Council will continue working to advance McCloud’s economic and environmental interests in the months and years ahead. We hope you will, too. Whether you want Nestlé to build a huge plant or no plant at all, now is the time to get involved. Attend community meetings, communicate with the District Board, and engage with your neighbors. This water belongs to the people of McCloud. It is our responsibility as McCloud residents to ensure that we do not just give away our most precious shared resource without broad public input throughout the process.

Posted on May 30, 2008

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker