Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
- Governor Proposes More Raids of Public Education Dollars
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Latest Schwarzenegger Budget Plan Slashes In-Home Supportive Services Which Helps 408,000 Elderly, Blind or Disabled Californians Live Safely At Home
By Jovan Agee
Political and Legislative Director
United Domestic Workers of America
Governor Schwarzenegger has proposed ravaging cuts to the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), which provides personal care and domestic services enabling 408,000 California seniors and people with disabilities to remain at home safely and avoid unnecessary, expensive and unwanted institutionalization.
"Governor Schwarzenegger has failed to protect the needy, blind, disabled and aged in our communities, and has shown a total disregard for what should be a top priority of California lawmakers overseeing state spending," said Bill Young, an IHSS consumer in Sacramento County and a member of the California Senior Legislature. "To deny those in need in the name of fiscal restraint is shameful for any leader, but especially desperate for Governor Schwarzenegger, who continues to disregard the plight of low-income families across the Golden State."
IHSS is a program that provides vital services to the elderly and disabled in this State. These people are retirees, veterans, children born with birth defects and accident victims. What do you call a person who refuses to find new avenues to raise revenues and year after year proposes to dismantle programs like IHSS that ensure people a decent quality of life? The State of California calls that person Governor.
“The proposed cuts will endanger people who use the services and devastate those who provide them,” according to Deborah Doctor, legislative advocate at Protection & Advocacy, Inc. (PAI)
“The IHSS program is cost-effective: the Legislative Analyst’s Office has estimated that the state spends an average of $10,000 per IHSS consumer versus $60,000 a year for each nursing home resident”, said Trula LaCalle, Ph.D., Executive Director of California Association of Public Authorities for IHSS.
“This round of cuts shows me the utter absence of common sense and compassion in this Administration. And it proves how out of touch Arnold Schwarzenegger is with real people struggling to survive in a devastating economic downturn,” said Frances Gracechild, Executive Director of Resources for Independent Living Centers and Co-Chair of the Quality Homecare Coalition.
“I don’t understand why the Governor refuses to consider an approach that includes some revenue raising as well as targeted program cuts to non-essential services,” said Bill Powers of the California Alliance for Retired Americans.
The Governor wants to cut the program three ways: eliminating some crucial services – including food preparation - to 84,000 consumers; imposing an unaffordable share of cost on 7,100 consumers, and – in his broadest cut – slashing the state’s contribution to the wages and benefits of the people who provide home care.
To maintain services and wages, counties would have to shoulder a huge new burden which they cannot afford and will not accept. The alternative is that workers wages would sink to the minimum wage of $8.00 an hour. The Governor’s plan would make it difficult if not impossible for consumers to find and keep quality home care workers as home care workers would turn to other less difficult and better paying jobs.
“I challenge the governor to spend a day providing care to an IHSS consumer and see if, in good conscience, he can live with his own proposals, said Herb Meyer, a senior and IHSS consumer from Marin County. “Why is he protecting the richest in California and hurting us?”
IHSS consumers are poor and will be poorer as a result of Schwarzenegger's other proposals to eliminate their cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) from Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and State Supplementary Payments (SSP). SSI is the sole source of income for some 1.3 million blind, aged and disabled persons; they must rely on the SSI grant for all their living expenses.
"We still understand the magnitude of the state’s tough economy, the severity of our budget deficit and the tough choices that must be made,” said Ernie Powell with AARP. “However, we still do not believe that the health and welfare of seniors and people with disabilities should be compromised”
Since being elected in 2003, Schwarzenegger has repeatedly proposed cuts to the state’s In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program; all of the proposals have been rejected by the Legislature. "The Legislature should again reject these cuts as foolish and short-sighted, since the IHSS program ultimately saves state tax dollars compared to costly alternatives, including institutional care,” said John Wilkins, an IHSS consumer in Fresno County and Co-Chair of the Quality Homecare Coalition. “Why must we come to Sacramento every year to remind lawmakers of this simple fact?”
“Californians that have the least are being asked to give up the most. It is time for all Californians to share the burden of the downturn in the economy”, said Teresa Favuzzi, Executive Director of the California Foundation for Independent Living Centers. “This can only be achieved through increasing revenue; cuts alone are just not going to work.”
Background:
Individuals eligible for IHSS services are disabled, age 65 or older, or blind, unable to live safely at home without help and have very low income. The IHSS program is the largest nonmedical program in the nation and destined to grow due to California's aging population. IHSS is funded with a combination of state, county and federal dollars that enable IHSS consumers to hire a caregiver.
County social workers assess people for IHSS and can authorize up to 283 hours per month of services. Services include housecleaning, meal preparation, laundry, grocery shopping, personal care services (such as bowel and bladder care, bathing, grooming, paramedical services, accompaniment to medical appointments, and protective supervision for individuals whose mental status or cognitive functioning poses a threat to their safety and well-being). IHSS is the largest publicly funded nonmedical program in the nation designed to help people with disabilities, the elderly, and blind—and with limited resources—live safely at home.
The IHSS program has always received bipartisan support, and is widely praised as a model state program for helping the elderly and disabled live independently.
Jovan Agee is the political and legislative director for the United Domestic Workers of America in Sacramento.
Comments
I am working daily and I mean Daily to fight for the rights of the elderly and disabled.
My commint to you that really makes me angry is:
I feel as though I need to tell all the elderly, and disabled "GO and commit a crime you will be taken care of beyound your dreams. The criminal has more rights,benefits,(medicaly,financially,and recieves SSI for being an indigent inmate) They also recieve full benfits that you or I have to work till the age of 65. Which means we become the next elderly and disabled who will suffer while our government takes VERY GOOD CARE OF A CRIMINAL.
Now if that didn't do it how about this. I have lost three children.I have held good jobs over the years and could not continue to put food on the table,watch my childern die, and not lend a helping hand to the other people who were effected by the same. At least I could keep other familys employed by doing home care so that they can go to work and try to feed their family while I took care of their family member.
Posted by: marianne nelson at May 15, 2008 05:05 PM
my mother makes 1,800 a month on social security and share cost takes 971 a months thats more than half of her check the time she pays rent and all of her other bills she has nothing for the rest of the month so how does this program help anyone who is disable having someone take care of her at home has been much easier on her than a nursing home. my dad was in a nursing home and they didnt even take care of him correctly and he died.
Posted by: tracie at October 11, 2008 07:31 PM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 