Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Field Poll Predicts California Voters Will Reject Landlord Backed Prop 98 But May Pass Rival Prop 99 on Eminent Domain

frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

The California Field Poll has just released its survey taken of likely voters in the June 3, 2008 election showing that three-quarters of these voters have head of the ballot propositions and that Proposition 98 is failing by 10 points, 43% to 33%, while rival measure Proposition 99 is favored by 48% to 30%.

These findings are in accord with the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) survey of voters released last week which showed Prop 98 failing by an even wider margin, 30% to 48% and Prop 99 holding a slim 8 point lead, 44% to 36%.

Why Proposition 98—Heavily Bankrolled by Landlords and Opposed in Over 64 Newspaper Editorials—is Losing Badly

A key finding in Field’s poll is that of those voting by mail (VBM), Proposition 98 is losing badly among those who have or are voting by mail. It fails by 16 points—31% to 47% in these VBM voters, many of whom have already cast their ballots, and who may account for up to half of the votes in this primary election. It will be difficult for this measure to make up that kind of deficit with day of election voters as many of those VBM ballots are already “in the bank.” It is also trailing by a narrower 35% to 39% amongst those who are expected to show up at the polls on election day.

Field’s results show that the more voters hear of Prop 98, the less they are inclined to vote for it. By a margin of 45% to 34%, those who have seen, heard, or read about the ballot measures (75% of the expected electorate) are opposed. Those who did not have knowledge of these ballot measures before being asked about them in Field’s poll are also opposed, but by a narrower 37% to 32%.

Like the PPIC poll, Prop 98 is failing by large margins with the state’s Democrats (26% to 52%) and non-partisan/others (24% to 45%), but is favored by Republicans 47% to 31%. In fact, the only other subgroup measured by Field that it is ahead in is with self described conservatives. It is failing by large margins with middle of the road voters (who constitute 44% of the registered voters according to Field) and liberals, and also, as in the PPIC poll, with both homeowners and renters.

PPIC identified that Proposition 98’s inclusion of a prohibition of rent control and other tenant protections is unpopular with the voters. They found that both renters and homeowners favor keeping California law where it is on this question.

Prop 98 is opposed by every major environmental group in California and has been editorialized against by at least 64 newspapers in the state, virtually all the major and minor press who publish here. Voters narrowly, by a 52% to 48% margin, defeated Proposition 90 on the last California ballot dealing with eminent domain. This one will go down by a much greater margin.

Why Proposition 99 is Likely to Pass

Key findings as to Prop 99 include the mirror image of Prop 98. It is favored by more votes who are voting by mail and those who are aware of its provisions. The 50% to 29% margin it is passing by with VBM voters, many of whom have already cast their ballots, means that it should be comfortably ahead in the early vote counted. It is also passing by those who are predicted to show up at the polls on Election Day by a healthy 46% to 31% margin. The more voters know about Prop 99, the more they like it—as it is passing 51% to 30% amongst those who had prior awareness of it and by a narrower 40% to 31% with those who had not heard of it until Field popped the questions on them. As mentioned earlier, Field’s data indicates the group of those who have heard of Prop 99, are about 75% of the voters.

Prop 90 is passing in all demographic and subgroups identified by Field. It passes overwhelmingly with Democrats and non-partisan others, and by 44% to 36% with the state’s Republicans. It is far ahead with middle of the road and liberal voters and is ahead with conservative voters by 42% to 38%. And it is passing by large margins with both homeowners and renters.

Prop 99 deals with the eminent domain issue and will protect homeowners, but without the overreaching for dismantling of rent control and other parts of California law. It bars the use of eminent domain to acquire an owner-occupied residence for conveyance to a private person or business entity.

Conclusion

It’s not over until the fat lady sings after the polls close and the votes are counted. But Field’s polling, conducted between May 17 and May 26 point to Prop 98 losing by a large margin and Prop 99 passing by a more narrow margin. The poll surveyed 660 likely voters with a margin of error of 4.1%. Both Field and PPIC, California’s most trusted and reliable polls show the same results. Barring a dramatic change of Election Day voters or those casting ballots late by mail these are the results. But don’t count on it—get out and vote on these ballot propositions and the other important races on your local ballot.

Posted on May 29, 2008

Comments

The field poll also predicted Prop 90 to pass, and in spite of the massive campaign against it and the overwhelmingly liberal turnout, it almost did.

Posted by: Ben at May 29, 2008 05:46 PM

Proposition 98 clearly violates the requirement that initiatives cover only a single subject. How else could an initiative's authors and sponsors campaign on the issue of eminent domain while squarely taking aim at all government regulations - including land use and rent control.

Eminent domain, apparently, is viewed by the authors as a good horse disguise for their Trojan soldier to get into the body politic and eviscerate all that benefits everyone but landlords and various other holders of large properties.

We landlords have mortgage control (you keep the mortgage you bought with and only refinance at your own discretion) and tax control (proposition 13). We also have modest annual rent increases and vacancy control to compensate for the increases of our other expenses (typically less than 30% of our costs - if not much less). Isn't it fair that you tenants get a little regulation on your side.

No - we'd like to screw you completely.

Posted by: Bob Sanders at June 2, 2008 05:28 PM

While I agree with you that Prop 98 is not good public policy, the law regarding "single subject" restrictions on ballot measures is not as clear.

This will be defeated tomorrow at the polls. Get out and vote.

Posted by: Frank D. Russo at June 2, 2008 08:13 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker