- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
- Governor Proposes More Raids of Public Education Dollars
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
California’s ‘Extreme’ Drunk-Driving Law Needs to be Beefed Up
By Jenny Oropeza
California State Senator
Early one Tuesday morning last January, Quirino Mateo Antonio, 31, was barreling down Sepulveda Boulevard at 95 mph in his Toyota pickup. At about 3:30 a.m., as Antonio’s truck crossed Wilmington Avenue, his vehicle slammed into a Cadillac — killing Juan Gabriel Ontiveros, a 32-year-old father of four.
Tests showed Antonio’s blood-alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit.
When is one drink too many? That is what many should worry about after an evening of fun with friends or family before deciding if it’s safe to get behind the wheel of a 4,000-pound battering ram.
Extreme drunken drivers, because of either addiction or apathy, don’t care about the law or about the safety of fellow motorists. While drinking alcohol impairs one’s judgment, intoxication is neither an excuse for stupidity — nor a license for murder.
Current California law says a driver found to have a .08 percent blood-alcohol content or greater faces charges of driving under the influence that for first-time offenders could result in at least a six-month suspension of their driver’s license, up to three year’s probation and fines, court costs and related fees of up to nearly $10,000. This BAC can occur after as little as two or three drinks, depending on sex and body size.
But a driver found to have a BAC of .20 or higher faces charges of ‘extreme’ drunken driving, and may face even harsher punishment – including mandatory installation in their cars of cell phone-sized devices that prohibit the car from starting if .03 percent alcohol is detected.
It takes most men and women five or more drinks to qualify as ‘extreme’ drunken drivers. Between 2001 and 2003, nearly 2,200 Californians were killed in crashes involving extreme levels of alcohol of .20 or higher.
Experts say such extreme drivers are at least 20 times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than a sober driver. California’s current threshold to be declared an extreme drunken driver is as lenient as only four other states that define extreme drunk driving as .20, according to the National Council of State Legislatures.
For these reasons, I introduced Senate Bill 1190. If approved, judges would be required to give greater consideration to first-time extreme DUI offenders to have breathalyzers installed in every car they drive.
Records show vehicle breathalyzers can dramatically reduce the number of drunk drivers on the road. In three states and two countries that installed breathalyzers in the cars of first-time offenders, recidivism dropped by more than half, some as much as a life-saving 77 percent.
SB 1190 has received unanimous, bipartisan support in two Senate committee hearings, and a 37-0 vote May 22 on the Senate floor. There would be no significant state costs, and my measure has already gained the endorsement of Mothers against Drunk Driving and the Association of California Insurance Companies.
If you agree this common-sense measure is needed to improve public safety, please urge your state Senator or Assembly member to support SB 1190. For more information, contact Kerry Hillis in my office at kerry.hillis@sen.ca.gov.
I leave you with two closing thoughts:
• Antonio, who pled guilty last month to gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and drunken driving causing injury, now faces a lengthy prison term.
• If Antonio had a breathalyzer installed on his pickup last January, Ontiveros’s four children might still have a father.
For more on SB 1190, visit Oropeza’s Web site at the address below.
Elected to the Assembly in 2000 and the Senate in 2006, Jenny Oropeza is one of the highest-ranking Latinos in the Legislature and chairs the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee. For more information visit www.senate.ca.gov/oropeza
Comments
[Editor's note: I have removed this ad for a drunk driving lawyer]
Posted by: lorsen at September 16, 2008 09:38 AM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
