Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Assemblymember John Laird on the Budget: “The Voters of California Have Been Taken Hostage but We Can’t Get a Ransom Note”
- Assemblymember Evans on the California Republican Budget Strategy and Their Grover Norquist Inspired Constitutional Amendment
- Schwarzenegger Acting the Tough Guy to Cover for His Weakness? Both Houses of California Legislature Meeting This Morning—But Don’t Hold Your Breath
- The California State Budget and the Coming Sharecropper Society
- California Legislature Completes Last Policy Committee Hearings on Bills For 2008—Hundreds of Bills Likely to be Killed in Appropriation Committees Today
- New SEIU Lawsuit Raises Further Questions About Governor Schwarzenegger’s State Employee Wage Order
- Cavala: Espionage “Double Agent” For the N.R.A. Linked by Lobbyist to McCain Campaign
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
California State Water Agency Disguises Massive New Diversions in Peripheral Canal Analysis: 1982 Deja vu All Over Again
By Barry Nelson
Senior Policy Analyst
Western Water Program
Natural Resources Defense Council
The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has released a preliminary analysis of a possible aqueduct to divert water from the Sacramento River to farms and cities in the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California. It is the first time in decades that state water officials have taken a serious look at sending Sacramento River water around, instead of through, the San Francisco Bay-Delta.
Instead of including new ideas, DWR's analysis reflects the same flawed approach that led California voters to roundly reject the Peripheral Canal more than 25 years ago (in 1982).
DWR's analysis shows that a Peripheral Canal could result in massive new freshwater diversions at a time when salmon and other fish species are crashing, when the salmon fishery has been closed for the first time ever, and the ailing Delta can barely support its vital role as a source of clean drinking water for millions of Californians. The Delta needs more fresh water, not less.
The DWR analysis is biased in favor of increasing Delta water diversions, most of which go to agriculture, not California's cities. The analysis envisions exporting as much as 1.5 million acre-feet more water than has ever been pumped from the Delta historically. The analysis disguises the magnitude of the increase by assuming an imaginary "reference case" that substantially increases exports over existing levels, despite the harm to the Delta that has resulted from such high levels of pumping.
The massive new diversions included within this analysis would be a disaster for the San Francisco Bay-Delta, delta communities and farms, and California's salmon fishermen. It would worsen water quality and worsen conditions for salmon on the Sacramento River, which is the backbone of the state's salmon fishery. It is astonishing that DWR chose to ignore the collapse of California's salmon fishery, as well as court-ordered protections for the delta smelt, in its analysis.
California water officials are simply moving in the wrong direction. The solution is to pump less, not more, water from the San Francisco Bay-Delta system.
The new analysis is on DWR's web site.
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national, nonprofit organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. Founded in 1970, NRDC has 1.2 million members and online activists nationwide, served from offices in New York, Washington, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Beijing.
Comments
It's even worse than Barry says. DWR wants to keep irrigating high selenium soils in the Western San Joaquin Valley which produce a toxic drainage dangerous to wildlife. There is no economic or safe way to dispose of huge amounts of toxic shallow groundwater being generated. This is a violation of California's unreasonable waste law embedded in the California Constitution. Our do-nothing State Water Resources Control Board members keep their heads buried firmly in the sand.
As much as 300,000 acres of alkali, selenium-laced farmland could be taken out of production freeing up one million acre-feet of Northern California water which could be used for Delta restoration and limited farming of western valley lands which should actually be in production.
Lloyd Carter
www.lloydgcarter.com
Posted by: Lloyd Carter at May 13, 2008 07:21 PM
It's even worse than Barry says. DWR wants to keep irrigating high selenium soils in the Western San Joaquin Valley which produce a toxic drainage dangerous to wildlife. There is no economic or safe way to dispose of huge amounts of toxic shallow groundwater being generated. This is a violation of California's unreasonable waste law embedded in the California Constitution. Our do-nothing State Water Resources Control Board members keep their heads buried firmly in the sand.
As much as 300,000 acres of alkali, selenium-laced farmland could be taken out of production freeing up one million acre-feet of Northern California water which could be used for Delta restoration and limited farming of western valley lands which should actually be in production.
Lloyd Carter
www.lloydgcarter.com
Posted by: Lloyd Carter at May 13, 2008 07:22 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 