Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Mark Leno Sure Looks Like California Senate Winner Over Migden and Nation in SurveyUSA Poll
- The Assembly Democratic Perspective on the May Revise and California’s Budget Crisis
- California Proposition 98 Would Eliminate Rent Control, Tenant Protections, and a Lot More
- The So-Called "Independent Expenditures" in California Assembly District 40
- California Secretary of Food and Agriculture Responds to California Progress Report Article on Moth Spraying
- To Win the Presidency, Democrats Need to Mobilize the Mexican American Vote Nationally—-As We Do in California
- California Prepares to Vote: Registration Deadline is Monday for June 3 Primary
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Four Years After Workers’ Compensation Cuts Passed: California is Fourth Lowest State in Payments to Permanently Disabled Workers
Insurance take more in profits than benefits provided
Bill to restore disability benefits passes Senate committee
By Frank D. Russo
When the legislature passed Governor Schwarzenegger’s workers’ compensation bill in April of 2004, the Governor said it was not his intention to take away benefits from seriously injured workers—those with lifelong permanent disabilities. Although he has repeatedly promised to make sure that those workers do not fall between the cracks--often saying this in his veto messages of bills the legislature has passed to do so—no action has been taken and California stands fourth from the bottom in what we pay permanently disabled workers.
The pattern is unmistakable. Insurance companies make more in profits than all the benefits paid to injured workers. [Source of chart at right: WCIRB Summary of December 31, 2007 Insurer Experience, released March 31, 2008] The statistics roll in, year after year, from those same insurance companies and from multiple studies from the state itself, showing that benefits have been slashed. The numbers shock the conscience. Yet the Governor has stonewalled, saying more study is needed. God forbid you or a loved one is seriously injured on the job.
So after members of the California Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee were shown a chart of what workers are paid in California compared with other states—based on U.S. Chamber of Commerce data—for grisly injuries including loss of an eye, ear, a foot, and others—the committee passed SB 1717 by Senate President pro Tem Perata.
This is Perata’s third attempt in three years to correct one of the major problems in the bill the Governor signed into law in 2004 and the way the Governor has implemented it.
Perata said: “These people were doing what they were supposed to do – working – and they got injured on the job. Now we’re punishing them. That’s not only morally wrong, it’s economically just plain stupid. We must help these workers.”
The Governor vetoed two similar previous bills by Perata, SB 815 and SB 936, because, he said, it was too early to assess the impact of the reform.
In his veto message of the first bill, SB 815, in 2006 the Governor wrote: “When the new permanent disability schedule took effect in 2005, I committed that we would monitor the impact of the new law on injured workers for 18 months, and if we found that seriously injured workers were falling through the cracks, we would fix it. That review will be completed by the end of this year, and I am committed to making any changes necessary to ensure that injured workers unfairly impacted by workers comp reform receive appropriate medical treatment and indemnity benefits.” [Emphasis added]
Since that time, multiple studies have shown that benefits for the permanently disabled have fallen dramatically. According to a state Division of Workers’ Compensation report released in May of 2007, the 2005 schedule resulted in a 43.4 percent cut in ratings and a 53.1 percent cut in benefit dollars.
“We’ve jumped through every hoop the administration has asked for – it’s time for the governor to sign this bill,” Perata said.

The committee also heard from Sue Borg, President of the California Applicant’s Attorneys Association (CAAA) whose members represent injured workers. Earlier in the day she held a news conference with the chart of benefits reproduced above in the background. This is some of what she had to say:
“It has now been four years since the enactment of SB 899. Study after study has shown that injured workers have suffered a dramatic reduction in permanent disability benefits because of this Governor’s regulations implementing his Permanent Disability Schedule. It was not the intention of the legislature to reduce permanent disability benefits in this fashion and the Governor, himself, stated that he did not want to harm injured workers. Last year and the year before that, when the Governor vetoed the legislature’s latest effort to correct this serious wrong, he said that his administration would correct the problem administratively. Months and years have gone by and this has still not been done.
“Despite Governor Schwarzenegger’s promises and despite the State’s own studies documenting the terrible losses, injured workers continue to suffer. California’s workers are now at the bottom compared with states across our nation for compensation when they are permanently injured on the job. The charts behind you show just how badly California workers fare under this Governor’s permanent disability schedule. And these good, hard-working people behind me are just two examples of what this Governor’s policies mean to real people. They lose their health, they lose their livelihoods, they lose their homes and the lives they worked so hard to achieve.
“With SB 1717, Senator Perata tries yet again to correct these terrible wrongs. This bill goes only part of the way to restoring the permanent disability benefits taken away by SB 899. And it does so in a manner that can be absorbed by the insurance carriers without increasing premiums. We urge the legislature to once again support this effort and we urge the Governor to make good on his promises to those working men and women who are injured on the job in California.”
Borg noted that SB 1717 contains modest increases phased in over a three-year period and that it will help only those people injured on or after the effective date of the new schedule adopted by the Schwarzenegger administration in regulations after the 2004 ill passed.
Here is a summary of SB 1717 provided by Senator Perata’s office:
SUMMARY OF SENATE BILL 1717 (Perata)
Intent Language
Section 1 of the bill is intent language stating that the purpose of the workers comp reform bills of the last few years was to make the comp system fair, but that it will likely be several years until we know the full implications of all of the changes and that in the meantime we need to make sure workers are receiving adequate benefits. It also states that the bill is not intended to undermine the positive effect reform bills have had on employers and workers.
Doubling the Number of Weeks PD Benefits are Paid
Section 2 of the bill doubles the number of weeks a permanently disabled worker receives benefits. It makes the change in three equal increments over three years. This has the effect of doubling total benefits; if an individual was entitled to $170 per week for 20 weeks, under the bill he or she would be entitled to $170 per week for 40 weeks.
The bill does nothing to change the conditions of eligibility. This means that it only impacts those workers who were already entitled to permanent disability benefits. During the three-year period in which the bill adjusts benefits for injured workers, the Administrative Director for the Division of Workers Compensation can continue to collect data.
Elimination of the “Bump Down” Provision
The third part of the bill, which differentiates itself from its two successors vetoed by the Governor (SB 815, SB 936), eliminates a current provision in workers comp law that allows an employer to reduce the permanent disability payments by 15 percent if the employer offers regular work, modified work, or alternative work for a period of at least 12 months.
According to several studies, including a Division of Workers’ Compensation study released in May of 2007, the 2005 schedule resulted in a 43.4 percent cut in ratings and a 53.1 percent cut in benefit dollars.
Also in May 2007, a report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said that the 2005 Rating Schedule slashed permanent disability benefits by more than 50 percent, making them among the lowest in the nation.
Comments
Liberty Mutual conspired with my employer, Magna Entertainment Corp, to violate the law and make (or cause to be made) fraudulent statements that led to the denial of my rightful claim of injury. Medical and monetary benefits were held hostage, coercing me to give up many rights. WHY IS EMPLOYER/INSURER FRAUD AND DELIBERATE TORTURE NEVER PROSECUTED?
Posted by: Yes at May 12, 2008 10:17 PM
Liberty Mutual conspired with my employer, Magna Entertainment Corp, to violate the law and make (or cause to be made) fraudulent statements that led to the denial of my rightful claim of injury. Medical and monetary benefits were held hostage, coercing me to give up many rights. WHO WILL PROSECUTE BLATANT EMPLOYER/INSURER FRAUD AND DELIBERATE TORTURE?
Posted by: Yes at May 12, 2008 10:20 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 