Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Constitutional Amendments Banning Same Sex Marriage Predictable if It’s Spring in an Election Year in California
By Lloyd Levine
Member
California State Assembly
It’s becoming predictable every election season. California’s anti-gay groups are attempting to put a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage on the November ballot. They presume Californians will agree with them and flock to the polls, erasing years of progress.
My hope is this November California voters will be galvanized and electrified by a sense of hope for the future, not limiting it. That’s why I am STRONGLY supporting the “Decline to Sign” campaign fighting to keep the same-sex marriage initiative off the ballot. Whether or not they succeed, California voters will be put on notice that this potential ban would write discrimination into the state’s Constitution.
It’s certainly not lost on most voters that the anti-gay marriage initiative is also a shameless tactic used by Republicans before to get voters to the polls. Recently, Arizona voters saw they were being played for fools by the Republicans and defeated a similar same-sex marriage ban.
The proposed constitutional amendment specifies that only marriage between a man and a woman be valid or recognized in California. The arguments by anti-gay groups are glaringly weak.
I have always supported same-sex marriage because I believe in a person’s civil rights, the United States Constitution and separation of Church and State. This country is not based on one faith or one moral code. Race, sex, religion and sexual orientation must never affect our civil rights. We all have equal rights under the law.
In March 2005 a Superior Court judge in San Francisco ruled that the law denying same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The state appealed and the California Court of Appeals in a split decision overturned the ruling. It was then appealed to the California Supreme Court. In March the justices heard arguments in the case and a decision is expected in the next three months. I believe the California Supreme Court will rule that the equal-protection clauses of the state’s Constitution trumps the state law defining marriage as being between one man and one woman.
Throughout this legal wrangling, the California Legislature also passed several bills allowing same-sex marriage but they were vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. I have been a co-author on each of them and am proud to be part of that history-making moment.
Same-sex couples are as likely as straight couples to live healthy, happy, productive lives and provide a good environment to raise children. The arguments offered by opponents to equal rights are retreads of the rhetoric used about Catholics marrying Protestants or Protestants marrying someone of the Jewish faith. We should remember that it wasn’t too long ago that California state law prohibited interracial marriage.
The proposed measure has yet to qualify for the ballot and we as Californians have the ability to stop it. If anyone asks you to sign a petition to “protect marriage” tell them no.
And frankly it should go without saying, but if anyone asks you or your friends to sign a petition to qualify something, anything for the ballot, make sure you read it first. I know that sounds obvious, but you would be amazed at the number of people I talk to or see signing petitions without first reading what they are signing.
California is the most progressive, innovative state in the nation and I refuse to go anywhere but forward on this civil rights issue. Lloyd Levine (D-Van Nuys) is the Chair of the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce and is a member of the Aging and Long-Term Care; Judiciary; Governmental Organization; and Elections and Redistricting Committees. He has been a coauthor of same sex marriage bills in the California legislature.
Comments
Here in Massachusetts where gay marriage is the law the only thing that has changed is that gay & heterosexual couples have equal rights. Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans if they choose. For the truth about gay marriage check out our trailer. Produced to educate & defuse the controversy it has a way of opening closed minds & provides some sanity on the issue: www.OUTTAKEonline.com
Posted by: Charlotte at April 8, 2008 07:15 AM
Levine is nothing but a hypocrite! He says "I believe in a person’s civil rights" - except if you own a pet, Levine wants you treated DIFFERENTLY, as scum that has to be under the thumb of legislation that dictates what you must do to your pet! ..."the United States Constitution" - Oh really, Mr. Levine? Have you heard of 'property rights'? As in my 'pet is my property and that includes his genitals!' ..."We all have equal rights under the law" - Except if you own pets, isn't that correct Mr. Levine? You may spout these words, but you sure as heck don't believe them!
When did Pet/Animal owners become second-class citizens in our United States simply because we own them? You are one of the very people that makes us so. I can only hope you never get elected for anything in the remainder of your lifetime. We have enough hypocrites in our government as it is.
Posted by: Mary at April 8, 2008 03:26 PM
Descrimination and prohibiting behavior are two completely different things.
As americans we are all aware that their are those that because of their "beleifs" will comit suicide by strapping weopons to their own body and walking into a croud of people. This happens because of what they believe. Just because they believe it does not mean that they can act and use themselves to kill others then hide behind civil rights.
Prohibiting gay marriage is not discrimintion it is prohibiting behavior that of itself is wrong. Defining marriage does not force anyone two believe anything just as making terrorism illegal does not prevent someone from believing anything. It is the action that is being removed.
Posted by: unanimous at August 28, 2008 03:16 PM
I strongly suspect that anti-gay is not synonymous with anti-gay marriage. As there are gays that do not support this. Moreover, in the states that have gay marriages, only the small fringes of the gay community are acting on it.
Marriage is an infrastructure created for a couples to procreate children and raise them successfully. It provides security and some financial benefits primarily for the children. And in a country of strongly declining birthrates, this is going to be an important issue in our future.
To feel that a gay dual income civil union is more financially disadvantaged than a single income family of four...sounds good in theory but in reality is ridiculous.
So if you are only interested in theory, a man, no matter what sexual activities he has indulged in, is always free to chose a wife to create a family - no discrimination there - he has the same rights as hetersexuals. And our constitution defines rights of individuals, not couples!
Posted by: John at May 5, 2009 02:32 PM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 