A Doctor Speaks on the Public Health Reasons Behind Paid Sick Days: Why California Should Pass the Healthy Families, Healthy Workplaces Act

What is disturbing however is that, unlike all of our peer countries, labor laws do not guarantee U.S. workers leave when they or their family members are ill (Heymann et al. 2007). This inconsistency between public heath guidance and labor law creates a potent barrier for workers to follow common-sense advice from their doctors and public health agencies.

For the 42% of California workers without paid sick days—almost six million workers—a common illness in their household means having to make an extremely difficult choice. Should they take unpaid time off from work; or, should they go to work sick or send their children to school sick? For low income workers, not going to work for even a few days may mean not having enough money to pay the rent, keep their children in childcare, or buy groceries. Some workers may also be insecure in their jobs, not knowing whether an absence from work may translate into the loss of a job. We know from public health research that the choice is difficult; parents without paid sick days are much less likely to care for their children when they were sick as those with these benefits. (Heymann 1999).

Ensuring Food Safety

For occupations such as health care workers, child care providers, and food service workers, it is critical to keep sick workers out of the workplace. Foodborne diseases cause approximately 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths in the United States each year (Mead) More than half of all U.S. reported food borne illness outbreaks occur in restaurants (Jones 2006).

A review of food borne disease outbreaks resulting from contamination of food by food workers, found that ninety-three percent of these outbreaks involved food workers who were ill either prior to or at the time of the outbreak (Guzewich 1999). In 2005, an ill worker without paid sick day benefits at a sandwich shop in Kent County, Michigan was responsible for the illness in over 100 customers (MMWR 2006). In 2006, a restaurant-worker without paid sick day benefits mediated outbreak of norovirus at Carrabba Restaurant Chain in Lansing, Michigan infected over 500 customers (MMWR 2007).

Contamination of food by an infected food worker is the most common mode of transmission of hepatitis A in food borne disease outbreaks (Guzewich 1999). A review of food-borne Hepatitis A outbreaks in the United States found that in many cases the infected food handler either did not seek medical care or delayed getting medical care (Fiore 2004).

Of course, food industry workers with infectious illnesses should not be going to work. The California Retail Food Code (2007) requires the local health officer to exclude a food service worker from a food facility if the employee is diagnosed with an infectious agent, symptomatic, and still considered infectious. In reality, we rely on workers to recognize the illness and their employers to self-enforce requirements that protect the public. Unfortunately, only 15% of workers in the food service industry have paid sick days—the lowest rate among major groups of industries meaning that many may delay or avoid seeking care for infectious diseases (Lovell 2006).

Preventing Costly Hospital Care

Getting timely primary and preventative care requires not only access to services and a way of paying for services, but also transportation, time, and the ability to leave work. Thus, paid sick days and access to heath care insurance are complimentary in helping to ensure access to early and preventative care, reducing the need for leave.

Because paid sick days remove a barrier to the utilization of primary and preventive care they can reduce the utilization of more expensive therapeutic and hospital care. The State of California considers many of the admissions to our hospitals for chronic diseases such as asthma, hypertension, and diabetes entirely preventable with timely and effective outpatient and primary care (Billings 1996). For example, early treatment of a flare-up of asthma in a doctor’s office or clinic can prevent deterioration to the point where hospital care is required. Every year several hundred thousand preventable hospitalizations occur in California (OSHPD 2008). A single hospitalization for asthma costs over $13,000.

Caring for Children and Dependents

At the individual level, taking the necessary time to rest and recuperate when sick enables a faster recovery and prevents the progress serious illnesses. For dependents, including children and elders, having access to an adult caregiver can be a matter of life and death. Children left home alone may be unable to see physicians for diagnoses, needed medications, or emergency help if their conditions worsen.

Today, 70% of mothers with children under 18 are in the workforce (BLS 2006); 25% and 35% of working Americans are currently providing care for someone over 65 (Bond et al 2002); and 2 in every 7 families report having at least one member with disabilities (Wang 2005). However, 52% of employees do not receive paid sick day benefits. The disparities between low-wage and high wage workers are even more striking: 72% of high-wage (highest quartile) receives paid sick day benefits compared to 21% of low wage workers (lowest quartile) receive (Lovell 2006). More troubling is that mothers of children with chronic condition are more likely to lack sick leave and less likely to receive other paid leave or flexibility (Heymann 1999).

What this means for public health should be obvious and unacceptable. Studies of hospitalized children have shown that sick children have shorter recovery periods, better vital signs, and fewer symptoms when their parents share in their care (Palmer 1993). The presence of parents has also been found to shorten children’s hospital stays by 31% (Taylor and O’Connor 1989). When adults receive support from family members when sick, they recover faster and more fully from conditions such as heart attacks and strokes (Bennet 1993; Gorkin et al 1993; Tsouna-Hadjis et al 2000).

Reducing Health Disparities

If we look at the patterns of disease within Cities, California and United States, we see the unacceptable reality of health being a product of race and class. People in the highest income group can expect to live, on average, at least six and a half years longer than those in the lowest. Among neighborhoods stratified by income and wealth, we see life expectancy vary by a decade or more (BARHHI 2008). Benefits for paid sick days are strongly correlated with income, making them one of the many factors explaining our nation’s growing health disparities. Providing paid sick days for all workers is a common-sense solution that addresses health disparities and reduces the strain on public safety net services.

Moving Towards a Common Sense and Fiscally Sound Health Policy

A fundamental purpose of government is to ensure that day-to-day living and working conditions support health and welfare. Labor and occupational safety laws, including limits on child labor, the minimum wage, and the work week, were essential contributors to the gains in life expectance in the 20th century. Today, it is equally important to think of labor policies as health policies.

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. spends $6102 per person on health care services—15% of our GDP and more than any other country the world (OECD 2006). Despite outspending our peers, life expectancy in the United States is a full year less than in Canada and England and three years less that Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. One reason these other countries are outperforming us with respect to health is that they have paid attention to ensuring healthy living and working conditions for all residents.

Overall, we should view paid sick leave benefits as a practical and cost-effective public health policy to prevent disease, avoid unnecessary hospitalizations, care for our children and elders, reduce health disparities, and control health care costs. Furthermore, adopting paid sick days would eliminate the perplexing inconsistency between our public health and labor laws.

Rajiv Bhatia received a Medical Doctorate from Stanford University and a Masters in Public Health from the University of California at Berkeley. He has practiced medicine since 1989. Since 1998, he has served as the Director of Occupational and Environmental Health for the City and County of San Francisco’s Department of Public Health. Bhatia is also an Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at the University of California at San Francisco and teaches a course in the Health Impact Assessment of Public Policy at UC Berkeley.

References Cited

1. Bennet S.J. 1993. Relationships among selected antecedent variables and coping effectiveness in postmyocardial infarction patients. Research in Nursing and Health 16:131-139.
2. Billings J, Anderson GM, Newman LS. 1996. Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations. Health Affairs 15:239-49.
3. BLS (U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2006. Employment Characteristics of Families in 2005. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Dept. of Labor. Available online at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf
4. Bond, J.T., C. Thompson, E. Galinksy & D. Prottas. 2002. The National Study of the Changing Workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.
5. CDHS (California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development) 2008 Available at: ttp://www.oshpd.cahwnet.gov/oshpdKEY/hospitalcharges.htm
6. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) 2008 U.S. Key Facts about Seasonal Flu. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/keyfacts.htm.
7. Dahl I.L, M. Grufman, C. Hellberg, & M. Krabbe. 1991. Absenteeism because of illness at daycare centers and in three-family systems. Acta Paediatr Scand. 80:436.
8. USDHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) 2007. U.S. Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation. Available: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/community/commitigation.html#V.
9. Doyle A.B. 1976. Incidence of illness in early group and family day care. Pediatrics 58:607.
10. Fiore A. 2004. Hepatitis A transmitted by Food. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:705-15.
11. Gilleski D.B. 1998. A dynamic stochastic model of medical care use and work absence. Econometrica 66:1-45.
12. Gorkin L. E.B. Schron, M.M. Brooks, I. Wiklund, J. Kellen, J. Verter, J.A. Schoenberger, Y. Pawitan, M. Morris, & S. Shumaker. 1993. Psychosocial predictors of mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1 (CAST-1). American Journal of Cardiology 71:263-267.
13. Guzewich, J., and M. Ross. 1999. Evaluation of risks related to microbiological contamination of ready-to-eat food by food Preparation workers and the effectiveness of interventions to minimize those risks. Available: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ear/rterisk.html.
14. Heymann J. 2000. The Widening Gap: Why America’s Working Families are in Jeopardy and What Can Be Done about It. New York: Basic Books.
15. Heymann J., A. Earle, & J. Hayes. 2007. The Work, Family, & Equity Index: How Does the United States Measure Up?. Boston/Montreal: Project on Global Working Families. Available online at: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/ihsp/WFEIFinal2007.pdf
16. Heymann SJ, Toomey S, Furstenberg F. 1999 Working parents: what factors are involved in their ability to take time off from work when their children are sick? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 153:870-4.
17. Heymann SJ, Earle A. 1999. The impact of welfare reform on parents' ability to care for their children's health. Am J Public Health. 89(4):502-5
18. Heymann SJ, Earle A, Egleston B. 1996. Parental availability for the care of sick children. Pediatrics. 98:226-30.
19. BARHHI (Bay Area Regional Health Disparities Initiative) 2008. Health Inequities in the Bay Area. Oakland, CA: Public Health Institute.
20. Jones, T.F. and F.J. Angulo. 2006. Eating in restaurants: a risk factor for foodborne disease? Clinical Infect Diseases. 43:1324-8.
21. Loda F.A., W.P Glezen, & W.A. Clyde. 1972. Respiratory disease in group day care. Pediatrics 49:428-437.
22. Lovell V. 2006. Washington DC.: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
23. Lovell V. 2006. Valuing Good Health in California: The Costs and Benefits of the Healthy Families, Healthy Workplaces Act of 2008. Washington DC.: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
24. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV. Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases.
25. Mottonen M. & M. Uhari. 1992) Absences for sickness among children in day care. Acta Paediatr. 81:929.
26. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Health Data) 2006. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,2340,en_2825_495642_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html
27. OSHPD (Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development) 2006 Available at: http://www.oshpd.cahwnet.gov/oshpdKEY/hospitalcharges.htm
28. Palmer S.J. 1993 Care of sick children by parents: A meaningful role. Journal Advances in Nursing. 18:185.
29. Strangert K. 1976. Respiratory illness in preschool children with different forms of day care. Pediatrics 57:191.
30. Sullivan P., W.E. Woodward, L.K. Pickering, & H.L. Dupont. 1984. Longitudinal study of occurrence of diarrheal disease in day care centres. Am J Public Health 74:987.
31. Taylor M. and P. O’Connor. 1989. Resident parents and shorter hospital stay. Archives of Disease in Childhood 64: 274-276.
32. Tsouna-Hadjis E., K.N. Vemmos, N. Zakopoulos, & S. Stamatelopoulos. 2000. First-stroke recovery process: The role of family support. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81:881-887.
33. Wang Q. 2005. Disability and American Families: 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-23.pdf