Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Tonight We Celebrate the California Supreme Court Decision for Marriage Equality--Tomorrow We Fight
- California Declares Marriage Equality for All-- A Watershed for Basic Fairness and Human Dignity
- Governor Schwarzenegger Opposes Any Move to Overturn California Supreme Court Decision on Sam Sex Marriage—Ruling Celebrated by Many
- Historic California Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Constitutional Right to Gay Marriage and Strikes Down Statutes and Initiative
- Governor's California May Budget Revision Makes Deeper Health Cuts
- Latest Schwarzenegger Budget Plan Slashes In-Home Supportive Services Which Helps 408,000 Elderly, Blind or Disabled Californians Live Safely At Home
- Schwarzenegger Again Proposes Taking from California Public Transportation—Only This Time Gas is at $4 a Gallon
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
The Plan for California Health Reform—2008 and Beyond
• Reform efforts continue in 2008 on individual market reform and transparency
• Consumer protection measures focus on balance billing and rescissions
• Health advocates oppose bills to lower coverage standards
By Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California
Undaunted by last year's failure to pass comprehensive health reform legislation , health advocates statewide are forging ahead on a three-year effort to win universal health coverage in California.
A number of bills have been introduced this year, which attempt to address various aspects of the health care market, and build upon last year's momentum and policy discussions. Many of the topics will be familiar to advocates who have worked on reform. In fact, many of the ideas being pushed this year were present -- in some form -- in ABx1 1 (Nunez). Those ideas include the disclosure of cost and quality data by health providers, a statewide public insurer to compete with private plans, and the organization of the individual insurance market into tiers and an ultimate ban on "junk" insurance.
In addition to health reform legislation, however, legislators have also introduced hundreds of bills, which will be heard in committee beginning in two weeks. Heath Access has focused the list of hundreds of bills to a couple dozen bills of interest to health consumer advocates.
Below is a list that includes the bill number, a description of the bill, and the position of Health Access California, as the statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition, as approved at a recent board meeting. A printable list can be found on our website.
2008 Bills
HEALTH CARE COVERAGE
Universal Coverage
• SB 840 (Kuehl) Would establish a single-payer health care system in California that would enable all citizens to have health coverage. Support
Children’s Coverage
• AB 1 (Laird/Dymally) and SB 32 (Steinberg) Would expand children’s coverage, including the Healthy Families program, to all children in families up to 300% of poverty ($49,800 for a family of 3). Support
• SB 1168 (Runner) Would allow adult dependent children, who are still covered under their parents’ health plan, to stay on that coverage even if the child takes a medically necessary leave of absence from school. Support
HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY
Oversight & Market Reforms
• SB 1522 (Steinberg) Would sort health insurance policies into five coverage categories, ranging from “comprehensive’’ to “catastrophic.’’ Organization of plans into these categories would enable consumers to better track premium, benefits and cost-sharing, and assist consumers in making apples-to-apples comparisons between plans. Would weed out “junk’’ insurance by developing minimum benefit standards. Sponsor-Support
• AB 1554(Jones) Would regulate insurance rates. Amend
• AB 2589 (Solorio) Would require insurers who sell to public entities to disclose brokers fees. Support
• SB 1440 (Kuehl) Would require every insurer to spend at least 85 percent of premiums on patient care. Support, seek amendments
Rescissions
• AB 1150 (Lieu) Would outlaw the practice of paying bonuses to insurance company employees when they rescind policies, setting targets for rescinded policies and/or setting financial goals based on savings on health care claims. Support
• AB 1945 (DeLaTorre) Would require approval by Department of Managed Health Care or Department of Insurance for each individual rescission. Support
• AB 2549 (Hayashi) Would impose a six-month time limit in which insurers have to rescind individual health care policies once consumers’ applications are approved. Support
Benefits
• AB1962 (DeLaTorre) Would require all individual insurance policies to cover maternity services. Support
• SB 1553 (Lowenthal) Would address provider concerns and interactions with insurers about California’s existing mental health parity laws. Amend
Insurance Market Options
• AB 2 (Dymally) Would reform the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Program, which provides coverage for “un-insureables” who have “pre-existing conditions.’’ Efforts would make the high risk pool more affordable and available. Support
• Pending SB 1622 (Simitian) Would create a statewide public insurer, connecting existing regional, county-based health care plans, to compete with private health care plans and provide consumers more affordable coverage choices. Support
Inadequate Insurance• AB 2292 (Garrick) Would allow Californians who have Health Savings Accounts, linked to high deductible health plans, to qualify for state personal income tax deduction. Oppose
• SB 972 (McClintock) Would create organizations of small businesses that could purchase unregulated and substandard health insurance products. Oppose
• SB 1669 (McClintock) Would allow insurance companies to exclude coverage of conditions for which an individual policyholder has received medical advice, a diagnosis, treatment, or prescription drugs at any point in the previous 10 years. Oppose
• SB 1603 (Calderon) Would give discount healthcare plans legitimacy in the state by allowing the Department of Managed Health Care to license and regulate such products. Oppose
Health Care Industry
Balance Billing
• AB 1203 (Salas) Would prevent emergency departments – which do not have a contract with a patient’s insurance company -- from directly billing the patient for services, requiring the hospital to seek reimbursement directly from insurers. Support
• SB 981 (Perata) Would prevent emergency physicians – who do not have a contract with a patient’s insurance company -- from directly billing the patient for services, requiring providers to seek reimbursement directly from insurers. Support
Provider Oversight
• AB 2741 (Torrico) Would require non-profit hospital sales to undergo health impact analyses to gauge the transaction’s effects on the affected community, health care services, and the community’s public interest. Support
• Pending AB 2842 (Ma) Would standardize what non-profit hospitals report as “community benefits” to justify their non-profit status. Support
• AB 2821 (Feuer) Would limit drug company gifts to doctors to no more than $250 annually, require disclosure of non-gift payments made to doctors and require annual public disclosure of any gifts higher than $50. Support
• AB 2967 (Lieber) Would require public reporting of cost and quality by doctors, hospitals HMOs and others in the health care industry. Support
• SB 1300 (Corbett) Would prohibit confidentiality clauses, which keep secret information on pricing and health care quality from consumers, in contracts between providers and insurers. Support
• SB 1351 (Corbett) Would require Attorney General oversight into transactions involving district hospitals. Support
Underserved Communities
• AB 1472 (Leno) Would establish the California Healthy Places Act, and require diverse state agencies and departments to work together assess and reduce health disparities in underserved communities. Support
• AB 2902 (Swanson) Would require the Office of Multicultural Health to encourage the use of community-based health care workers to help facilitate and coordinate better health outcomes in underserved communities. Support
For more information about legislation, please contact Hanh Kim Quach, policy coordinator, 916.497.0923 x 206 or hquach@health-access.org
Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has also been published on the Health Access Weblog.
Comments
Wow, look at all the new bills introduced to help me.
I don't need maternity services and don't want to pay for it.
No wonder my rates keep going up!
The one good bill, that would help me and actually save me some money you Oppose.
AB 2292 (Garrick) Would allow Californians who have Health Savings Accounts, linked to high deductible health plans, to qualify for state personal income tax deduction. Oppose
CA is one of only a few states that won't allow a tax deduction for savers. Shame on those people who buy health insurance and save. You wonder why people drop their insurance? All the mandates and crap I don't need in the plan.
We should make they buy their own insurance for a year. Thanks for making sure my rates will go up again, the insurance company just passes those mandates straight to me.
Posted by: Jeff at March 12, 2008 07:13 PM
Jeff,
Income redistrobution is a main theme of socialism. Those foolish enough to work, earn, plan and save should share with those who don't.
Having an HSA is also a tool of the rich to use in not paying their fair share in taxes...
Posted by: Jay Gould at March 12, 2008 09:17 PM
Government simply won't give up on the myth that additional legislation will help the situation. Tons of research by Kaiser Foundation, MedSave.com and others show that free markets and consumer education are the most cost-effective approaches to health care reform. See the short blog titled "Americans are Uncommitted to Universal Coverage" at http://short-term-medical-insurance.blogspot.com/2008/03/americans-are-uncommitted-on-uninversal.html .
Posted by: Kim Morris at March 17, 2008 02:13 AM
What planet are you commenters from? Californians clearly want more than the unbridled market to take care of health care according to every poll I've seen in the last two years. We've seen how excesses have worked on the subprime mortgage mess and other areas. Government has a role to play here and the markets haven't prevented insurance carriers from raking off 25% off the top that should be going to medical care.
Posted by: Frank D. Russo at March 17, 2008 07:25 AM
Frank,
Plant work my ass off and sick of taxes. I would like to be able to save more and get taxed less. Most other states allow people who BUY high deductible health insurance (HSA) to save for when they need it and not pay taxes on the money. Savings is good. Over spending is bad.
If CA saved a little we would not have the budget problem we have now. Repeat after me. Saving is good.
Posted by: Jeff at April 9, 2008 07:10 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 