Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- As Another Special Session on Budget Looms, Senator Asks if California Can “Bail Out Ourselves” By Retirement System Purchase of State’s Short-Term Debt
- Schwarzenegger Thinks Jerry Brown Has Best Shot at Being Next California Governor if Obama Wins Presidency
- Governor Schwarzenegger Should Call Special Session on California’s Mortgage and Foreclosure Crisis Linked to Our Budget Problems
- If It Were up To Them We’d Still Be in the Depression
- Schrag: The Problems with Prop 4 on Parental Notification
- With Friends Like New York Times Columnists Thomas Friedman, Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich – Does Barack Obama Need Enemies?
- California Budget Crisis – Again-- Possible Special Session on State Budget
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Aerial Spraying for the Light Brown Apple Moth in California is Dangerous to Our Health and Unnecessary

By Robert Lieber, RN
Mayor
City of Albany
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Secretary Kawamura’s recent emergency declaration enabling the Light Brown Apple Moth (LBAM) aerial pesticide spraying of the Bay Area relies on blatant misrepresentations of the truth, fear-mongering and outright lies. The spray program he defends imperils California’s families, children, pets, and the environment, based on no real science and no solid facts.
The real facts are simple. CDFA sprayed Monterey and Santa Cruz counties, and at least 643 people got sick. They reported their illnesses although the State made no infrastructure available. The State only accepted health complaints on offical EPA forms signed by a physician, but physicians were not trained to assess the toxic exposure associated with the spray. Anyone without insurance or access to a physician could not “officially” report health problems. Secretary Kawamura’s assertion that there were no adverse reactions to the spray is an outrageous bureaucratic determination, not a true health assessment.
And that is only the beginning of the Secretary’s swift boating. He has the audacity to imply wide support for the spraying from environmental organizations. In fact, the Sierra Club is on record, along with 25 other health and environmental groups, opposing the aerial spraying.
Make no mistake about it, the chemical used last year, Checkmate, is a pesticide despite Secretary Kawamura's white-washing talk of harmless pheromones. The facts: Checkmate is made up of three components that have either not been tested or are known to be dangerous:
1) The synthetic moth pheromone: not tested for long-term human exposure risk. The State’s own health Consensus Document includes a disclaimer that it is based on studies that assume the pesticide will be sprayed over unpopulated agricultural areas.
2) The so-called inert ingredients (not inert meaning inactive; “inert” only means they do not target the pest): contain carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive effectors, liver toxins, skin irritants, and are unsafe to inhale.
3) The microscopic plastic capsules in which the pesticide is sprayed, which time-release over 30 days: Inhalation risk is unknown, but U.C. Davis scientists found some particles are small enough to be inhaled into the deep lung where they cannot be expelled. It doesn't take a scientist to know that can't be good.
Secretary Kawamura focuses only on the LBAM aerial spraying, ignoring the program’s other toxic and questionable practices, including requiring wholesale nurseries to use the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos, employing state personnel to install traps and use pesticides in private yards that are toxic, especially to cats, honeybees, and the beneficial predators that naturally keep pests in the environment – including LBAM -- in check.
Secretary Kawamura's fear-mongering comments that, if left unchecked, LBAM will destroy every green plant in the state and possibly the country is contradicted by facts: Even CDFA says there has been no crop damage attributable to LBAM in California. Professional biologists testify that LBAM is a minor pest in New Zealand where it is also an introduced exotic species. New Zealand’s biggest LBAM problems are from a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) quarantine, not from actual damage. In addition, entomologists agree that LBAM has likely been in California for 30 years, so if there was going to be crop damage, wouldn’t we have seen it by now?
So now we come to the Big Lie about the “pest that was never a pest.” Decades ago, LBAM made it onto a USDA list of supposedly voracious invasive species. To date, I have been unable to find this original designation. The main goal was, I believe, to protect powerful U.S. agriculture interests from competition from crops from New Zealand and similar areas. As a result, today we have the “Light Brown Apple Moth Emergency.”
Secretary Kawamura expresses concern that other states and countries might ban California produce because of LBAM – even though those countries’ quarantine restrictions were adopted to mimic the U.S.’s. Note that Europe does not quarantine for LBAM.
So the plot sickens. It's all about money. Big money. Rather than admit that LBAM is not the threat that’s been claimed and request that LBAM’s USDA classification be revised based on up-to-date science, Secretary Kawamura is willing to poison us and our environment. And to spend $500,000 on a public relations firm to help “sell” this charade to us.
I am ashamed of Secretary Kawamura's disgraceful public deception campaign to sell a hopeless, dangerous and likely unneeded “eradication” program to the people. He should immediately call an end to the plans to give us time to make rational decisions based on sustainable, Integrated Pest Management principles. Short of calling off the spray and undertaking sound pest management, he should resign.
Comments
This is yet another blatant Malthusian plot to decimate the world's population of 'useless eaters' aka we the people; we need to make a big stink about this so we can stop those bums from spraying us with Raid; we are NOT insects!
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing...."(Santayana)
Posted by: tom at April 11, 2008 06:18 AM
Perhaps they can establish a pheromone nasal spray that attracts all you California "fruit and nuts" to move south of the border. That would increase the IQ of both regions.
Posted by: Ralph at April 11, 2008 11:50 AM
Great article.... Thank You
What are we doing?? putting money ahead of common sense and our health. Allowing such a stupid thing. Do they think we are all idiots?
The only reason this moth causes any financial loss is we are such a picture perfect "no blemish" kind of society.
The Moth could cause some "minor blemishes" on the rind of fruit. SO?
It does NO harm to the fruit though, what so ever. None! But we will ALL be sprayed with chemicals to prevent the "never been done before erradication attempt, for a harmless moth, all for some blemishes it might cause??
This is the emergency?
What is wrong with out leaders? Obviously they must own some stock in Stewart Resnick's many companies such as fruit, citrus, almonds, pistachios, pomegranates, Fiji Water,
The Franklin Mint,..OK I heard he sold it.
Why is California the only state Check-mate is allowed to be used in? Steward Resnick, Pesticide leader, owns Suterra, the pest management company.? OH
He also owns 100,00 acreas or farming land in the San Joaquin Valley...OH
owns Roll International Corp...OOHH
He also is one of the richest men in California... OOOHHH
He also owns Telflora, the biggest flower wire service business...gee no wonder all the small flower growers are getting quarantined
He owns Paramount Agribusiness, the largest farming operation of tree crops in the world....OOOH
Lots more....check it out
Posted by: Santa Cruz resident at April 16, 2008 05:41 PM
The natural predators of the LBAM were killed off in Australia and New Zealand due to chemical pesticide use. It took two years after stopping pesticide use to bring the natural predators back. That's what happens when we start messing with Mother Nature.
We do not know better than Mother Nature. There will Always be some pest that will do some crop damage.
If we continue to use pesticides thinking it is going to help, we are going to be in BIG TROUBLE when there are no more bees, bats, birds, and the natural predators to other insects that keep everything going and in check.
CHECK-MATE is the END of the game.
Let's NOT play.
*
Posted by: Check-Mate at April 16, 2008 08:30 PM
The natural predators of the LBAM were killed off in Australia and New Zealand due to chemical pesticide use. It took two years after stopping pesticide use to bring the natural predators back. That's what happens when we start messing with Mother Nature.
We do not know better than Mother Nature. There will Always be some pest that will do some crop damage.
If we continue to use pesticides thinking it is going to help, we are going to be in BIG TROUBLE when there are no more bees, bats, birds, and the natural predators to other insects that keep everything going and in check.
CHECK-MATE is the END of the game.
Let's NOT play.
*
Posted by: Check-Mate at April 16, 2008 08:31 PM
The natural predators of the LBAM were killed off in Australia and New Zealand due to chemical pesticide use. It took two years after stopping pesticide use to bring the natural predators back. That's what happens when we start messing with Mother Nature.
We do not know better than Mother Nature. There will Always be some pest that will do some crop damage.
If we continue to use pesticides thinking it is going to help, we are going to be in BIG TROUBLE when there are no more bees, bats, birds, and the natural predators to other insects that keep everything going and in check.
CHECK-MATE is the END of the game.
Let's NOT play.
*
Posted by: Check-Mate at April 16, 2008 08:39 PM
The natural predators of the LBAM were killed off in Australia and New Zealand due to chemical pesticide use. It took two years after stopping pesticide use to bring the natural predators back. That's what happens when we start messing with Mother Nature.
We do not know better than Mother Nature. There will Always be some pest that will do some crop damage.
If we continue to use pesticides thinking it is going to help, we are going to be in BIG TROUBLE when there are no more bees, bats, birds, and the natural predators to other insects that keep everything going and in check.
CHECK-MATE is the END of the game.
Let's NOT play.
*
Posted by: Check-Mate at April 16, 2008 09:03 PM
Thank you for the clear and informative article. I have already written to Gov Schwazenegger and our Assembly woman, Loni Hancock regarding my concerns over the sprays. Everyone needs to do their part to stop the work of greed from destroying California as we know it.
Posted by: El Cerrito resident at April 23, 2008 03:06 PM
Hi Robert--we're Albany residents, and appreciate your service to our community. We also appreciate your thoughtful and impassioned argument on this critical issue. If anybody is interested, here's an amazing study from the USDA which outlines the extremely low cost projections from crop damage from LBAM (and this backs up everything you wrote, Robert):
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/lba_moth/downloads/lbameconomicanalysis.pdf
Posted by: Ben at April 23, 2008 04:31 PM
I am extremely concerned and I am wondering what I can do as a resident of Marin to stop this. I am making plans currently to move out of the area because of this if it is not going to be stopped.
Posted by: Martin Willis at April 27, 2008 10:01 PM
I grow apples. And pears, peaches, citrus, plums, figs, grapes. I also have ducks, a dog and a cat.
My motto is 'first, do no harm",
I suggest no spraying at all unless/until there is clear, specific timing and need.
toxic to apple moth? Perhaps to bees? Perhaps to beneficial insects and four-footed friends?
(I don't spray at all). Please don't usurp my control over my own property.
Thank you.
Posted by: aline Bier at May 12, 2008 01:01 PM
I grow apples. And pears, peaches, citrus, plums, figs, grapes. I also have ducks, a dog and a cat.
My motto is 'first, do no harm",
I suggest no spraying at all unless/until there is clear, specific timing and need.
toxic to apple moth? Perhaps to bees? Perhaps to beneficial insects and four-footed friends?
(I don't spray at all). Please don't usurp my control over my own property.
Thank you.
Posted by: aline Bier at May 12, 2008 01:18 PM
I grow apples. And pears, peaches, citrus, plums, figs, grapes. I also have ducks, a dog and a cat.
My motto is 'first, do no harm",
I suggest no spraying at all unless/until there is clear, specific timing and need.
toxic to apple moth? Perhaps to bees? Perhaps to beneficial insects and four-footed friends?
(I don't spray at all). Please don't usurp my control over my own property.
Thank you.
Posted by: aline Bier at May 12, 2008 01:24 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 