Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Republican Leader Rejects Concept of California Budget Compromise
- They're Not Covering the Same Convention
- Recycling Bill Bottled Up in Closing Hours of California Legislative Session
- Cavala: Editorial Opinion Masquerading as ‘News’ in the ‘Bee’
- Stand-Off On California Budget Continues--No Agreement Close—Floor Sessions Today
- A Young California Delegate Reports from the Floor of the Democratic Convention: Hillary Clinton Tamed PUMA’s and Won Wavering Democrats for Obama
- The California Budget Gets a Tardy and an Incomplete Grade: The Governor and Legislative Republicans Undercut Education
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Sunday Before the California Primary: Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Caroline Kennedy, Stevie Wonder, and Maria Shriver at UCLA
By David Dayen
d-day
Every so often, you go to one of these events and see something special. I'm not talking about Maria Shriver, yet.
One of the first speakers was a woman named Susan, a 93 year-old Korean-American and veteran of the Navy in World War II. She talked about going to basic training in the deep South and seeing segregation up close for the first time. "We've come a long way," she said, and in an auditorium filled with people of all races and ethnicities, uniting around one candidate, it rang true.
After the pre-program, which featured Susan as well as some California legislative leaders (the two highest-ranking woman in the California Legislature, Asm. Majority Leader Karen Bass and Sen. Majority Leader Gloria Romero, are supporting Obama), Buffy Wicks, a field coordinator with the California campaign, took the stage. They instituted an "adopt-a-precinct program" at the event. Each attendee was given a call script and a sheet with a couple dozen names from the Voter Activation Network (VAN) list, which has been developed over the past couple years as a pretty well-scrubbed voter contact database. I'm not sure that this will result in a ton of calls, and certainly the campaign is relying on other sources than people who showed up to a rally. But it gives the people that attended a sense of investment in the campaign, a chance to do more than show up, to really participate in their democracy. And that's really an invaluable sense of empowerment.
Being on the campus of UCLA, the demographic was very young. It was the first time I've seen a crowd do "the wave' at a political event. There were homemade signs and banners everywhere, and a bunch of iconic-looking posters, designed by Shepard Fairey, with a roto-scoped drawing of Obama and the word "Hope." (We snagged one.)
After the pre-program, which featured Susan as well as some California legislative leaders (the two highest-ranking woman in the California Legislature, Asm. Majority Leader Karen Bass and Sen. Majority Leader Gloria Romero, are supporting Obama), Buffy Wicks, a field coordinator with the California campaign, took the stage. They instituted an "adopt-a-precinct program" at the event. Each attendee was given a call script and a sheet with a couple dozen names from the Voter Activation Network (VAN) list, which has been developed over the past couple years as a pretty well-scrubbed voter contact database. I'm not sure that this will result in a ton of calls, and certainly the campaign is relying on other sources than people who showed up to a rally. But it gives the people that attended a sense of investment in the campaign, a chance to do more than show up, to really participate in their democracy. And that's really an invaluable sense of empowerment.
After that, the JumboTron at Pauley Pavillion played the "Yes We Can" song that has been generating such buzz online (incidentally, Scarlet Johansson is the "Dan Aykroyd in We Are The World" of that song). And then, out came LA labor leader and campaign co-chair Maria Elena Durazo to introduce Caroline Kennedy. Caroline is not entirely comfortable in this format, but she held some authority as she addressed the crowd. She said that she is not normally involved in politics, but this year is different, and she saw in Obama someone that inspired her the way others tell her that her dad inspired them.
Oprah Winfrey was next, with a short but powerful speech that kind of seemed to be more about answering her own critics than talking about Sen. Obama. Oprah can definitely work a crowd, and she got them into a frenzy by speaking about how this campaign on the Democratic side is a declaration of victory for women's and civil rights. "I hear a lot of people say 'How could you, Oprah, you're a traitor to your gender.' But I'm a free woman, and I'm following my own truth." She recycled a Toni Morrison quote about how Obama has a creative imagination (that's certainly what you see in the "Yes We Can" song, which he didn't create, but inspired) and wisdom, in her view a gift that can't be taught or borne from experience.
Oprah brought out who we thought was the final speaker, and at Michelle Obama's side, unexpectedly, was Stevie Wonder. He connected the opportunity of Obama to the realizing of seeing an MLK holiday and the end of apartheid in South Africa. I'd say it was over the top, but it was Stevie Frackin' Wonder. He ended with a little musical number.
I had never seen Michelle Obama speak before. She has learned well for her experience in this campaign. Talking without notes, she told her own story, her husband's, and the story of America, with the struggles of the working classes at the forefront. It was almost a speech John Edwards could have given, with a good deal of populism and concern for the working man. She talked about how the nation is too isolated, too cynical, too guided by a fear which clouds our judgment and cuts us off from each other. "I am what an investment in public education looks like," she said as she discussed life on the South Side of Chicago, growing up with a father with a disability who nevertheless provided for his family in an era when a city worker's salary could do that much. She really kind of hearkened back to a simpler time in America, before the middle class squeeze, when regular folks didn't get the shaft. We have, Michelle said, evoking her husband's speech in an Atlanta church the day before the King holiday, an empathy deficit, a lack of fulfilling our mutual obligation to one another. "Our souls are broken in this nation."
It was striking, bold, almost angry at what has happened "through Democratic and Republican administrations" over the last few decades. I didn't expect a speech so focused on our forgotten commitments to family and community, on the needs of all of us to lift each other up, on the repeated phrase "to whom much is given, much is expected." Her recitation of Barack's resume was familiar, but it was the presentation, the stridency in the voice. "Sometimes we don't know what the truth looks like because we haven't seen it in so long... Barack will NEVER allow you to go back to your lives."
Look, I agree. We should be angry about what has been done to our country. We should demand more of our leaders and ourselves. We should have a persistent voice in our ears telling us that we can accomplish our goals, we can live out our dreams, that we "are better than anyone's limited expectations."
Then there was the bit of news made at this event, about a Mrs. Shriver who showed up at the end. I pasted the video above, so you can see it for yourself. I consider it very significant. It will be an above-the-fold story for two days in California, given all the drama of a family split, the mystique of the Kennedys, etc. Moreover, Democrats generally like the first family for whatever reason, and so it has a real-world residual effect. But really, Shriver's speech folded nicely into the Obama message, this idea that we are the ones we have been waiting for, that change begins with you, as it says on Obama's Super Bowl ad.
Obviously there have been significant gains for Obama in the Golden State over the past week. Based on what I had seen from the delegate allocation (particularly that practically every Congressional district with a heavy Latino population offers 4 delegates, which means Obama will split those while winning extra delegates elsewhere), I was ready to predict that Obama would lose the popular vote while taking the majority of the delegates. Now, I'm almost ready to believe the words of one supporter, moments after Shriver took the stage.
"We just took California. We just took California."
Dave is a writer, comedian and TV/film editor based in Santa Monica. He is an elected member of the Democratic State Central Committee from the 41st Assembly District. He blogs on state and national politics at http://d-day.blogspot.com/
Comments
Dave, excellent job! That was a very vivid report from the ground and I give you mad props for the We Are the World reference.
Posted by: jamie at February 4, 2008 12:11 AM
I am 60 years old and this is the second time I have ever voted. I was never motivated. But today, I voted proudly, because Barack Obama gives me HOPE and a reason to vote. Thank you and God Bless you.
Posted by: JPR at February 5, 2008 01:42 PM
Would LOVE to get a transcript of Michelle Obama's Sunday speech
Posted by: Andrew Nixon at February 6, 2008 04:02 PM
Would LOVE to get a transcript of Michelle Obama's Sunday speech
Posted by: Andrew Nixon at February 6, 2008 04:03 PM
I am looking for the transcript of Michelle Obama's Sunday speech in CA. I would love to share it with others in learning how a great man is supported by a loving wife to become the next president of USA
Posted by: teresa thacker at February 7, 2008 06:40 PM
I am looking for the transcript of Michelle Obama's Sunday speech in CA. I would love to share it with others in learning how a great man is supported by a loving wife to become the next president of USA
Posted by: teresa thacker at February 7, 2008 06:40 PM
While agree with Oprah Winfrey that she has the right to support either candidate in the 2008 Presidential Election, I also think she is in a unique position, as Oprah wouldn't be a household name without the relentless support of women. It wasn't men who responded so favorabley to her initially and lest one not forget their roots of success. Yet, Oprah is also a Black women in today's society and understanding the dynamics and being a minority in essentially two categories, it's very reasonable to understand why Oprah would want to support a Black candidate. We can say all we want that her picking a Black candidate doesn't have anything to do with the fact that he's Black, but the fact that Obama consistently receives 85% of the Black vote speaks volumes. This is particularly true when considering that the White candidate that Obama is facing has a long history of supporting the Black community and as such, has earned support from one of the most fundamental characters of the Civil Rights Movement, John Lewis. Oprah has the right to choose the candidate that she believes will serve the country best and if she believes that it's Obama, then sobeit. As a woman, I don't hold any resentment whatsoever toward her for supporting the male candidate. I understand completely.
I was watching a news clip the other day and heard her speaking to a rally in California. In a very aggressive and condescending tone she stated something to the effect of, "Some people are upset with me because they think I should have supported a woman for president. I tell them, I'll do whatever I want." While on the surface, the comment doesn't seem all that bad. It makes logical sense that she would, of course, do what she believed was best in terms of supporting a candidate for president. Yet, this tone and attitude certainly does not reflect that "Oprah" that women throughout the country have helped to make extremely popular over the years. Instead of Oprah, being that champion of women's rights that so many women have made her out to be, expressing some genuine understanding for why women would be disappointed that she chose to support the male candidate, when in front of a group Obama supporters, she intentionally cites these women and belittles them for how they feel. She makes a point of how the women feel and then goes on to minimize their feelings of essentially being betryaed. Her comment is meant to embarrass the women are disappointed and essentially shame them into believing that their feelings are unjustified. Now, as a woman, I recognize what she did and I'm confident that every female does. Isn't this kind of behavior exactly what women look to Oprah to fight against? It's a very female quality to have feelings. As women, I would expect a stereotypical male to respond the way that Oprah did. But, because Oprah has always seemed to defend a woman's right to feel validated in her feelings, I would expect Oprah's response to these women to be much more in tune with what actually works to motivate women versus delivering comments that will only further alienate them.
These are her constituents that she is disregarding in her efforts to assert her right to choose a presidential candidate. Does she really have to bury them in order to support the candidate? Is that her intention? If not, I think that all Oprah needed to say was something like, "I know that there are women who feel that by choosing the male candidate in this race, they are not only letting Hillary down, but they are letting all women down. I want you to know that as a women, I considered that, too, but upon doing so, I made the deicision to support Obama because I believe that he will create opportunities for women and I believe that he has the best chance to also make society better as a whole. First and foremost, I want women to know that in my decision to support Obama, I am in no way asserting that we don't have a long way to go in terms of improving women's rights as well." Had Oprah said that, she would have essentially told the disappointed women that she understood things from their perspective, but that in the end, she believed that the best way to address the issues that they all shared was to support Obama. Even if the women didn't agree, they wouldn't feel alienated and belittled by her. They just might be disappointed, but in the long term, they would move on with no hard feelings. For Oprah, that would translate into no negative affect on her status and frankly, on her financial well being. But, when push came to shove, Oprah showed that maybe she's not the champion of women's rights that we have idolized her to be. She has a chance to make up for this and regain the support of many women who feel slighted by her. These are women who have been extremely loyal to her over the years and it's understandable that when you feel that strongly about someone, you expect something in return. It's too bad that Oprah doesn't seem to get that at this point because considering how loyal these women have been to her, it wouldn't be that hard for her to make it right and yet, she now seems to have the arrogance that only someone with money and power seems to garner. Maybe she's not so special after all.
Posted by: Keish Thompson at February 10, 2008 11:58 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 