Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

California Coastal Commission Rejects Toll Road: Shows a People-Powered Coalition Can be Effective on Transportation and Land Use Issues

Cruickshank.jpg By Robert Cruickshank

The hearing lasted over 12 hours, and was apparently one of the most raucous and boisterous Coastal Commission meetings in some time. Gathered at the Del Mar Fairgrounds to handle the overflow crowds, the Coastal Commission finally voted last night to reject the planned freeway through San Onofre State Park. According to the Los Angeles Times:

“Before a boisterous crowd of more than 3,500 people, commissioners decided 8 to 2 that the proposed Foothill South project violates the California Coastal Act, which is designed to regulate development along the state's 1,100-mile shoreline. They reached the conclusion following hours of sometimes heated public testimony that pitted protecting the environment against the need to relieve traffic congestion in south Orange County.

“The decision was a major setback for the Transportation Corridor Agencies, which has spent years and tens of millions of dollars preparing to construct the 16-mile tollway as an alternative to Interstate 5.

"This project looks like something from the 1950s," said Commissioner Sara Wan of San Francisco, who voted against the tollway. "Putting a massive project in an environmentally sensitive area, it is inconceivable."

The Transportation Corridor Agency that runs OC's toll roads is considering appealing to the US Secretary of Commerce, which owns the land San Onofre State Beach is leased from. Susan Davis successfully attached an amendment to a recent military spending bill to prevent the toll road from being built on federal land, and Bush signed that bill with the amendment intact last month.

The coalition opposing the freeway was impressive in its size and scope. It included environmental groups from across California, and city governments from the San Diego coast. Surfers were also active and engaged, including major surf and skate companies like Etnies and Vans. Obviously the lion's share of credit goes to the Surfrider Foundation, which has been exhorting people to stop the toll road and "Save Trestles" ever since I was in high school in Orange County over ten years ago. There were finally some Juaneno Indians there to speak up on behalf of an ancestral village and burial ground that would be paved over by the road.

People-powered coalitions don't just exist in elections - they're all over our state, and the victory over the 241 toll road is a major victory for just that kind of organizing power. It's also a key victory for the Coastal Act and a "defining moment" for the commission, one of its members said.

It's also good to see that the Coastal Commission understands just how much things have changed in this state. No longer can we look to new roads to solve our transportation problems. For environmental, sustainable, climate, and even fiscal reasons, mass transit, particularly rail, is where we need to be investing for our future - not a toll road that will struggle to stay financially viable and see steadily decreasing traffic as peak oil sets in.

More importantly, this victory shows that a people-powered coalition can organize from a very broad base to articulate a 21st century vision of transportation and land use.

Robert Cruickshank is currently completing a Ph.D. in US history through the University of Washington. He is a Californian through and through, however, born and raised in Orange County and educated at UC Berkeley. He resides in Monterey, California, where he is active in supporting sustainable development projects, public transportation systems, and other progressive policy goals.

Posted on February 07, 2008

Comments

You're absolutely right, this was a large communtiy coming together to protect the last sliver of open space we have left in the region.

Posted by: Mark at February 7, 2008 10:19 PM

I live in Northern California so I was not aware of this project until running across it here. Subsequently I spent some time reviewing pertinent documents. I have come to the conclusion that, once again, several small, vocal activist organizations have defeated a construction project that may well have been supported by a majority of the affected population. Is this how democracy works in California?

Posted by: Richard at August 26, 2008 06:26 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker