Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

A Sign of The Times: L.A. Editorial Embraces New Water Philosophy

Traci-Sheehan.gif Traci Sheehan
Executive Director
Planning and Conservation League


This Monday the Los Angeles Times made news of its own with a surprising editorial that marks a major shift in long held battle positions in California's water wars.

The editorial strays from the Los Angeles tradition that sought to accommodate new growth with water from a far away river, such as the Owens River, the Colorado River and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Instead, the Times blazed a new path that recognizes that increasing demand, climate change and environmental crises make imported water less reliable than ever before. The editorial rightly calls for Southern California to accommodate growth through aggressive development of reliable local water supplies, such as stormwater capture, water recycling, groundwater clean-up, and increased efficiency.

Even more astonishing, the editorial proclaims to be the first in a Times series to "sketch a blueprint for a perfect water system" that "acknowledges how limited a resource water truly is–a plan that seeks to balance the needs of people, the economy, and the environment in considering how best to use and preserve it."

The editorial reflects a growing momentum for a new strategy to meet water needs in California that focuses on regional supply development and decreased reliance on water imports, the cornerstone of PCL's Investment Strategy for California Water (2004).

We look forward to working with progressive leaders in Southern California to implement a new vision for California water.

Administration Peddling Old Water Idea; Legislature Says 'Not So Fast'

Despite the positive developments in Southern California, this week the Administration sent signals that it is focused on implementing an old idea, building a canal or pipe around the Delta in order to export water directly from the Sacramento River for delivery to the San Joaquin Valley, the Bay Area, and Southern California.

In a legislative hearing on Tuesday, Senator Mike Machado (D-Linden) grilled California Secretary of Resources Mike Chrisman about the Administration's plans, (first revealed last week and later in the Stockton Record) for studying and eventually building the peripheral canal without legislative oversight. While Chrisman's testimony was short on specifics, the Record reported that when asked whether the Governor would move forward on the canal plans, Chrisman answered, "The Governor can do what he wants in this particular area."

Hopefully, Chrisman's response does not mean that the Governor will act ahead of his own Delta Vision Task Force in declaring a solution for the Bay Delta Estuary. That Task Force is working quickly to develop an implementation plan for the Delta, and has not yet endorsed any particular recommendation for infrastructure in the Delta.

We strongly recommend that the Administration leaders take a look at the Los Angeles Times and follow their lead in moving away from old water tactics and toward more reliable water management in California.

Accounting For Ourselves: State Water Board Asks Staff To Run The Numbers On Proposed Global Warming Actions

Last Tuesday, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) urged their staff to refine a set of proposed measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the movement, treatment, and use of water in California. As reported last week, the measures are being considered for inclusion into the SWRCB's Strategic Plan and the AB 32 Scoping Plan later this spring.

Although support for the initiative was high, several Board members expressed concerns about the lack of specifics in the staff proposal. Board member Gary Wolff also urged staff to establish better metrics and "consistent, defensible, and comparable" accounting mechanisms to track the effectiveness of any emission reduction measures the Board chooses to pursue.

To help the Board meet their tight deadlines, PCL's Matt Vander Sluis presented a set of recommendations on measures to prioritize, including enforcement of Best Management Practices at water utilities, incorporation of climate change into the SWRCB's review of water rights, and requirements for water recycling at water treatment facilities. The Natural Resources Defense Council also submitted detailed comments, highlighting California's water use efficiency potential and the environmental benefits of Low Impact Development.

Expect more news when SWRCB staff report back to the Board next month!

Traci Sheehan is the Executive Director of the Planning and Conservation League, a statewide, nonprofit lobbying organization. For more than thirty years, PCL has fought to develop a body of environmental laws in California that is the best in the United States. PCL staff review virtually every environmental bill that comes before the California Legislature each year. It has testified in support or opposition of thousands of bills to strengthen California's environmental laws and fight off rollbacks of environmental protections.

Posted on February 29, 2008

Comments

Statewide, farmers overuse and waste water. Farming activity now consumes about 85 percent of the available state water supply. Households use about 5 percent. The rest goes to government, industrial, and commercial. Simple math shows that forcing farmers statewide to lower their water use by only 5.88 percent would equal the amount of water households use. Further, about 30 percent of farm irrigation water goes to waste in runoff from the land. Via political pressure, however, farmers resist (1) improving their farm irrigation practices and (2) recycling farm water runoff. The Golden State has plenty of water available, but the distribution and use of this water does not happen rationally. Farmers grab most of the water, and then waste nearly a third of it. So any fair and sound solution to the water supply problem must require farmers statewide to stop using and wasting so much water. Then others will have enough water.

Posted by: anotherview at March 3, 2008 10:43 PM

I disagree with you anotherview. I live in a farming community and most of the farmers I know use drip irrigation and invest in ways to cut their water usage. This is an EXPENSE to them. The electrical costs alone for water pumping are extreme. They are always looking for ways to reduce their irrigation.

How about golf courses, lawns, and other uses that don't provide as much benefit as FOOD?

How about overdevelopment? One of the contributors to our current housing crisis. Developer and BIA lobbyists in Sacramento have convinced the state and local governments that there is a housing shortage. When, in fact a large percentage of the homes bought in the last ten years were second homes, vacation homes, speculation homes. The only growth we are accommodating is immigration. The Governor's Housing Director is from the farmworker advocacy.

Posted by: SoCal at March 4, 2008 04:55 PM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker