Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Interesting California Political and Policy Tidbits for the Evening
By Frank D. Russo
There are a few tasty morsels from the day that can’t wait for morning.
First of all, Governor Schwarzenegger is going to endorse a yes vote on Prop 93 on term limits. The LA Times broke the story earlier this afternoon and the Sacramento Bee has confirmed it, giving the added detail that the Gov will have an opinion piece in the Times tomorrow. (If only he wrote here, I could have broken that story.)
Secondly, the only person those of us in the politicosphere thought had a chance to be competitive with Jackie Speier for the Democratic nomination for the Congressional seat being vacated by Tom Lantos at the end of his term—State Senator Leland Yee—has announced he is not running. Just before 5 p.m., Yee released this statement:
“I am humbled by the outpouring of support from the people of San Francisco and San Mateo County who have encouraged me to run for Congress. However, at this time, my family and I have decided it is best to continue the work started in the State Senate. I am committed to addressing the critical issues currently before the State Legislature, including providing universal healthcare and protecting services for our working families. In the years to come, I look forward to working with the next member of Congress in serving the residents of the Peninsula.”
Nomination in this overwhelimingly Democratic district is tantamount to winning the seat, and we were planning on running Speier’s speech announcing that she was running tomorrow with pictures from the event. (We still will.) She’ll make a damn good Member of Congress and I had the opportunity of talking with her this morning on a press call. One other politico predicted she will be in a good position to run for the U.S. Senate in 2010.
We’ll also have an article tomorrow on legislation being carried by Senator Yee on juveniles and incarceration and new study unveiled earlier today.
The Legislative Analyst, Elizabeth Hill, had some interesting things to say about the Governor’s budget and the 10% across the board cut approach which is the antithesis of setting priorities and a report she issued this afternoon. If you want a heads-up on this news, check out the Times, read the 24 page report she issued or watch her webcast.
By the way, tomorrow’s Senate Health Committee hearing on AB 1X 1—the Nunez-Schwarzenegger-Perata health bill has been postponed to January 23 because Hill’s office had not finalized their report and assessment of the financial underpinnings of the proposal. If the Capitol Weekly article from this afternoon is at all accurate, this may actually be a close vote in committee with the outcome unknown, one of the final hurdles before final legislative passage and the welcoming Governor’s desk.
See you tomorrow!
Comments
"The quality of mercy is never strained..." except in CA
California now has the uncertain distinction of having the most women prisoners in the nation, as well as the world's largest women's prison.
As you know, it is estimated that by 2022, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) will incarcerate about 30,000 elders. Due to health-related expenses, the annual cost of imprisoning an older person, at a conservative estimate, is at least $70,000, twice that of a younger prisoner. Research studies question the wisdom of committing such vast economic resources for the continued punishment of older prisoners, the group with the lowest recidivism rate of any segment of the prison population.
CA's "grannies in the prison yard" have already served long portions of their sentences.. as non-violent and non-drug related offenders, yet they must serve 50% of sentences before they are considered for parole; they should be given special consideration vis-a-vis the Governor's early release initiatives but they are not.. . as the Governor's initiative does not address the elderly prison population .
The extension of mercy to these women is the right ting to do... since it appears that an over-zealous testosterone-laden judiciary has demonstrated a bias toward them in rendering exaggerated sentences (via their male counterparts)... just because they were/are single parents induced by economic pressures to steal money.
With no threat of recidivism... the "grannies" would better serve the interests of CA taxpayers by being afforded the opportunity to make restitutions on the outside under parole rather than waste away behind bars. `
Posted by: Ronin at January 20, 2008 07:28 AM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 