Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Perata: Getting the Facts on Healthcare Reform

By Don Perata
President pro Tem
California State Senate

Perata-New-session.gif


As you know, we’ve been working for months to reform healthcare in California, a critical step on the path to universal healthcare. Ultimately, we want everyone to get the care they need, at a price they can afford – without the worry that a sudden illness will lead to financial ruin.

As much as we want and need healthcare reform, we must recognize that the care Californians need will not come cheaply. Our state already spends $38 billion providing care to more than 7.4 million Californians each year. Expanding these programs will cost billions more.

Yesterday, the Assembly approved draft legislation that would provide health coverage for millions of Californians. Some would be allowed to join existing state programs, while others would gain coverage through a new form of health insurance.

While I applaud and share the goal of this legislation, I’m also deeply concerned. The plan relies entirely on an as-yet-unwritten funding initiative to cover at least $14 billion in annual costs.

What’s more, this action comes as our state heads into its most difficult budget year in a generation. The foreclosure crisis is driving home prices down – and tax revenues are falling with them. The Governor’s Office projects our state’s deficit at – strangely enough – at least $14 billion.

It falls to the Senate to ask the hard questions:

• How will the Governor balance the budget?

• How will his budget proposal affect the healthcare we already provide – along with funding our schools, police and fire services?

• And how will this new healthcare proposal affect the state’s budget, now and over the long term?

We cannot make sound decisions in the dark – about the Governor’s budget or about financing healthcare reform. That’s why I’ve asked the widely respected Legislative Analyst to examine these issues and report her findings to the Senate.

When major legislation passes with great fanfare, it’s easy to get caught up in the moment, play to the cameras, and quickly go along. It happened when the state enacted energy deregulation – only to create a crisis from which we’ve yet to fully recover.

That’s not something I intend to repeat, especially on an issue as crucial to our state as the health of its citizens. The Senate will debate and act on healthcare reform when we have the facts to be sure we’re getting it right.

Below is the text of the letter Don Perata sent to the Legislative Analyst's Office on Monday:

December 17, 2007

Elizabeth Hill
Legislative Analyst
925 L Street, Suite 1000
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ms. Hill:

I am writing to ask for your assistance in providing an independent fiscal analysis of the health reform proposal now under consideration by the Legislature. Your report would be especially helpful when the Legislature reconvenes in January and Senate policy and fiscal committees begin conducting public hearings.

Although I recognize that a thorough fiscal analysis of the package cannot be completed until all of the financing elements are resolved, I believe work to analyze the programmatic components can and should begin now. Much of the plan is now contained in AB 1 1x, which would be contingent on passage of an initiative measure to be placed on the November 2008 ballot. The level of the tobacco tax remains the most significant unresolved revenue issue; however, the proposed increase is likely to be between $1.50 and $2.00 per pack.

I have attached the most recent analysis from Dr. Jon Gruber. This reflects the latest version of the proposal, including the cost of the purchasing pool, tax credit and effects, employer and employee contributions, and level of federal match.

Specifically, I would like you to address the following questions:

• When the program is fully implemented, what are the expected revenues and costs?

• How would these factors change after the first five years?

• What are the risks, cost pressures and implications for the general fund?

In addition, the Governor is due to deliver his proposed budget on Jan. 10. I would also like to know how the Governor’s spending plan affects the health reform legislation’s underlying finances.

If you have any questions regarding this request, feel free to contact Diane Cummins or David Panush, my policy advisors on the budget and health care. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
DON PERATA

Posted on December 19, 2007

Comments

On behalf of all Californians, I feel we are entitled to an analysis of what profits will accrue to the insurance companies.

If the State of California is going to require that its citizens buy insurance from a for-profit insurance system, isn't it the duty of our government to expose what that wealth shift will be, before writing a law that imposes this shift?

Posted by: Cheryl at December 20, 2007 01:09 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker