Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Nearly 3-1 Support for Health Care Reform Passed by Assembly in New California Field Poll

Broad Based Support Includes 2-1 Support for Cigarette Tax Hike to Pay for Plan
frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

The California Field Poll released today has nothing but good news from California voters as to the health care reform bill passed by the California and awaiting action I the State Senate.

By a margin of 64% to 23%, in all segments of the voting public as sliced and diced by this respected poll, there is support for the bill supported by all Assembly Democrats and Governor Schwarzenegger. By a margin of 63% to 23%, there is also support for the $2 per pack cigarette tax to help pay for it.

This is very good news because, if passed by the Senate, voter approval on the November 2008 ballot will be needed for it to take effect. A previous expansion of health care that would have required all employers in the state to offer health insurance or pay into a pool, SB 2 by John Burton, then President pro Tem of the Senate, failed narrowly in the November 2004 election ballot where it was placed by a referendum.

Before we dive under the hood of this latest poll, it should be noted that it was taken December 10-17, during a time that the budget weighed heavily on many Californian’s minds and that all but the last day of polling was taken before AB 1X 1 (Nunez-Perata) was passed and the impressive show of support in the Capitol Rotunda by a coalition that includes both those who supported the 2004 ballot measure and opposed it.

The poll has a large sample size and a margin of error of 2.9%.

Here are the key breakdowns by subgroups:

• 30% of registered voters “strongly” support the health reform package and another 34% favor it “somewhat”, combining to 64% support. 11% oppose it “strongly and 12% oppose it “somewhat”, combining to 23% opposition.

• 74% of Democrats support it while 16% oppose it. 52% of Republicans support it, while 34% oppose it. 61% of non-partisan/others support it.

• The package is ahead by at least a two to one margin in all regions of the state—with the exception of Orange County. But even behind the Orange curtain, it is ahead by 54% to 34%.

• It is ahead by lopsided margins in all age categories. The closest category is the 65 and older set of voters where it is ahead 55% to 27%.

• It is ahead in all race/ethnic groupings by 3-1 margins except for the White (non-Hispanic) group where it “only” leads 62% to 25% (a 37 point margin even in this least supportive group).

• It has its strongest support from those with household incomes of less than $20,000 per year—69% to 16% and in all other income categories.

Perhaps most significantly, there is a direct correlation between how closely those interviewed say they are following health reform efforts and the level of support, but the measure has strong support amongst those at all levels of interest. By a margin of 69% to 23%, those who are “following very closely” favor it. In the segment of voters who are “following not at all closely” (13% of all voters) is leads by its narrowest margin, 55% to 26%.

Those that follow this issue the closest are likely to be the “opinion leaders” in public debates and should boost its chances in the Fall of 2008.

It is very interesting to look at what these voters told Field (in their own words) were there reasons in support or opposition to the health care package. The top three reasons for support (and the only ones that were more than single digit responses) were:

• Everyone needs insurance/you could get wiped out without insurance 38%

• Something needs to be done/the system is broken/needs to be changed 19%

• It gets more people insured/broadens coverage/gets us closer to universal coverage for everyone 16%

The top 3 reasons for opposing it and also the only responses that were above single digits were:

• Too much state involvement/oppose socialized medicine/not fair to taxpayers 26%

• People shouldn't be forced to get insurance/oppose mandating insurance 15%

• Too much of a burden on small business/many employers wouldn't be able to afford it/ties the hands of business 11%

This package is opposed by many who are on the left—and want to see single payer—and opposed by many on the right—who want government to do precious little on health care and want “the free market” to have a free rein in this area. What is most significant is the fact that of the voters who oppose the health reform package (23%) only 8% of those voters cite the reason that it “doesn’t go far enough/ a band aid approach/prefer single-payer/make it more like Canada.” While there are concerns in the reasons for opposition that can be lumped into this concern of the left, including the 15% of the opposition who say people should not be forced to get insurance and those who have concern about its affordability (9%), by far the biggest reason is the “socialized medicine” response and other reasons given by those on the right. This is not surprising, given the measures greater support by Democrats and non-partisan others and the lesser degree of support by Republicans.

In fact, if one looks at the cross tabs of this poll published online in the Sacramento Bee (Capitol Alert—available by free subscription), the measure has its lowest support from “strong conservatives”, 47% to 40%, and surprisingly, its highest support from those who categorize themselves as “strong liberals”, 79% to 11%. It has support from moderate conservatives 56% to 30%, middle-of-the-road votes by 65% to 21%, and moderate liberals by 71% to 18%.

Cigarette Tax is Most Favored Funding Source

Since the financing of this plan will be voted on in a ballot initiative in the November 2008 presidential election, it is clear why this tax has been chosen by the Governor, the Speaker, and other architects of this package. It has by far the largest support and least opposition from the voters.

By a two-to-one margin--63% to 33%, the cigarette tax is favored. This is stronger than issuing bonds against future lottery proceeds (57% to 41%), increasing the sales tax by 1% (46% to 50%), and leasing the operations of the state lottery (42% to 46%).

In fact, the support for the cigarette tax lopsidedly comes from those who favor it “strongly.” 50% say they favor it strongly and 13% say they favor it “somewhat.” Most of those against it, are opposed “strongly” (25%) and 8% are opposed “somewhat.” Only 4% have no opinion. Starting out with 50% in the strong category is not a bad place to begin. Having money from the large coalition in support of the health care package to counter the expected heavy tobacco industry ads in opposition to the ballot measure gives this measure an opportunity to come out differently from the last tobacco tax on the ballot, Prop 63.

For more information on the Field Poll, check out the numbers at the Field site or the Sacramento Bee’s Capitol Alert.

Posted on December 21, 2007

Comments

I'm sure the Sarkysian family is thrilled by this outpouring of support for expanded insurance companies.

Posted by: dday at December 21, 2007 11:40 AM

THIS IS THE MOST REGRESSIVE TAX IN CALIFORNIA HISTORY AND ALL WHO SUPPORT IT SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES. READ MY FULL COMMENT AT ricksramblings-thoughts.blogspot.com/2007/12/cigarette-taxes-progressive.html

Posted by: RICK BENSCO at December 21, 2007 10:54 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker