Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Fallout from the Subprime Mortgage Mess in California and What We Must Do

In this week’s Democratic weekly radio address, Ted Lieu, Chair of the Assembly Banking Committee, and Assemblymember Kevin de Leon present legislative remedies to reduce the impact of the subprime mortgage crisis.

You may listen in English or Spanish or read the transcript below.

Ted Lieu.jpg
Hello, this is Assemblymember Ted Lieu, chair of the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee.

As our state faces looming budget shortfalls that threaten vital funds for infrastructure, public safety, and social services, the emerging sub-prime mortgage crisis is poised to jeopardize our attempts to salvage our state's financial commitments.

Because reckless mortgage lenders issued variable interest rate home loans to folks that simply couldn't afford to pay their monthly bills, 1 out of every 88 homes in California are currently undergoing foreclosure.

According to the Center for Responsible Lending, nearly 180,000 California homes will be lost to foreclosure from the 826,900 sub-prime loans made in 2005 and 2006 alone.

California could lose nearly $3 billion in property tax revenue and another $1 billion in sales and transfer tax revenue.

Remarkably, an estimated 61% of the sub-prime mortgage borrowers would have qualified for loans with more reasonable monthly payments, had their lenders not been so narrowly focused on short-term profits.

But this isn't just a problem for those about to lose their homes.

Home price are expected to decline in California by up to 20-percent and that’s because each foreclosure within an eighth of a mile of a single-family home results in a 1% decline in the value of that home.

And working- and middle-class neighborhoods are especially in danger of being blighted due to abandoned homes.

While this is not uniquely a California problem, our state is especially hard hit, with five of the top ten areas with the highest foreclosure rates in the country, including Stockton, Riverside/San Bernardino, Sacramento, Bakersfield, and Oakland.

And the response from the White House has simply been tepid and woefully inadequate.

Clearly, the time for legislative action is now.

Assembly Democrats have compiled a practical and effective package of bills to address our state's housing woes, and we have asked the Governor to call for a special session to bring to the table all interested parties.

Our package includes bills that will identify at-risk borrowers and determine what lenders have done to assist them and ban prepayment penalties that essentially prevent borrowers from refinancing.

Other bills add consumer real estate mortgage loans to the list of consumer contracts subject to California civil code translation requirements, protecting potential homeowners for whom English is a second language, and we hope to end incentives and kickbacks that spur lenders to push sub-prime loans onto buyers ill-equipped to afford their monthly payments.

And our bills will improve counseling services that can protect consumers from bad loans and help them find potential avenues for keeping their homes, and we will introduce tough income verification regulations, requiring lenders to consider an applicant's ability to repay over the life of a loan.

Assembly Democrats are committed to working in a bipartisan and pragmatic fashion to protect homeowners and preserve our state's fiscal solvency, and we hope others in Sacramento are equally committed.

To allow these necessary reforms to be subject to partisan gridlock is literally not a luxury our state can afford right now.

Thank you for listening. This has been Assemblymember Ted Lieu, chair of the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee.

Spanish Kevin-de-Leon-2.jpg

Qué tal, les habla el asambleísta Kevin de León.

Así como nuestro estado enfrenta un presupuesto sombrío el cual pone en riesgo fondos importantes para nuestra infraestructura, la seguridad pública, y los servicios sociales, la emergente crisis de los préstamos hipotecarios comúnmente conocidos como subprime de alto riesgo tiene la capacidad de hacer peligrar nuestros intentos de salvaguardar nuestros compromisos financieros del estado.

Debido a que muchos prestamistas imprudentes otorgaron préstamos con intereses variables a personas que simplemente no podían pagar sus cuentas mensuales, y en este momento 1 de cada 88 hogares en California se encuentran al borde de la bancarrota.

Es más, de acuerdo con el Centro de Préstamos Responsables, casi 180,000 viviendas en California se perderán debido a la bancarrota y todo por culpa de los 826,900 préstamos de subprime de alto riesgo otorgados en el 2005 y 2006 solamente.

Nuestro estado confronta la posibilidad de perder casi 3 mil millones de dólares en impuestos y mil millones en rentas relacionadas con la venta y transferencia de casas.

Se estima que un 61% de los prestatarios calificaban para préstamos con pagos más razonables, y todo esto gracias a los prestamistas que maliciosamente estaban más enfocados en sus ganancias de corto plazo.

Pero esto no es solamente un problema para las personas que perderán sus hogares.
Los vecindarios que se verán especialmente mas afectados son los de la clase media y la clase trabajadora.

Aunque este problema no es singular para California, nuestro estado se verá especialmente afectado, ya que cuenta con cinco de las diez áreas más desbastadas con la bancarrota de la nación, como Stockton, Riverside/San Bernardino, Sacramento, Bakersfield, y Oakland.

Y la respuesta de la Casa Blanca ha sido simplemente tibia y deplorablemente inadecuada.
Claramente, el tiempo para actuar legislativamente es ahora.

Nosotros, los asambleístas demócratas hemos compilado un paquete de medidas efectivas y practicas para enfrentar nuestra tragedia de familia, y también hacemos un llamado al gobernador para que convoque a una sesión especial para enfocarnos en este asunto.
Nuestro paquete incluye la identificación de los prestatarios en riesgo y determinar que fue lo que hicieron los prestamistas para ayudarlos y prohibir los pagos de refinanciar que hace imposible a los prestatarios a buscar otras fuentes de préstamos.

Otras medidas exigen que los préstamos hipotecarios subprime al consumidor sean agregados a la lista de contratos al consumidor para que estén sujetos al código civil sobre requisitos de traducción de California, así protegeremos a los potenciales compradores cuyo segundo idioma es el inglés, y esperamos eliminar los incentivos de mordidas que impulsa a los prestamistas a empujar los préstamos de subprime de alto riesgo a los compradores.

Nuestras medidas también mejorarán los servicios de asesoria para proteger a los consumidores de los malos préstamos y ayudarles a abrirles las puertas para que no pierdan sus hogares, además introduciremos regulaciones más estrictas para la verificación de ingresos, y requisitos para que los prestamistas consideren la factibilidad de los solicitantes de poder pagar el préstamo a largo plazo.

Los asambleístas demócratas estamos comprometidos a trabajar de una forma bipartidaria y pragmática para proteger a los dueños de casa y preservar nuestra solvencia fiscal del estado, y esperamos que otros en Sacramento también se comprometan de la misma manera.

El permitir que estas reformas esenciales se conviertan en una traba partidaria es literalmente un lujo que nuestro estado no se puede permitir en este momento.

Gracias por su atención. Les habló el asambleísta Kevin de León.

Posted on December 15, 2007

Comments

No bailout for the Subprime Morgage Empire.

A direct bailout to save the morgagors is more appropriate. A complete review of of the loan document should be a prerequisite for the bailout. Fine and penalty should be imposed on those loan officers and loan processor who knowingly falsified information on behalf of the morgage holder to enable for them to get the mortgage from the first place.

I know that some broker agents has knowingly inflated borrowers INCOME in loan applications that are based on STATED INCOME LOANS. Some escrow/title professionals have also "rushed" gullible barrowers into signing loan agreements without completely explaining what the barrowers are signing. Particularly for those transactions that are closed outside the place of business; ie. Contracts Closings at home (where the borrowers are placed in a presure to close eventhough they do not fully understand what they are signing; believing that once they have signed it that they have no other recourse to back out. It is particularly a big problem when closing officer does not know answers to question posted by the barrower at the time of closing during a visit outside of their office; where assistance is readily available.

These unconventional lending practices has become quite COMMON in the MORTGAGE industry; most prominent in the mortgage is being brokered.

This practices are commonly utilized as tactic of a predatory lender.

This is what happens when government who are suppose to be the watchdog for public interest fails. De-regulation from the conventional business practice and those individuals who take advantage of this is the culprit.

Posted by: anon at December 17, 2007 10:17 AM

I think a lot of people are talking about how the homeowners are to blame for not reading the documents and not being aware the rates were going to go up. Yes they did know that one day the rates would go up and they were assured by the lenders that they could re-fi before that day came and everything would be fine. Most people believed in the American Dream and wanted to go for it. No one could have predicted the fall in prices. The banks on the other hand who are aware of the problem could save many people from losing there homes by simply leaving the rates at the homeowners current rate. Most people have been making the payments for two or three years even five years every month on time. It was only the hugh jump in morgage rate increase that caused many people to give up hope of that American Dream. I am sure it would have been a lot more profitable for the banks to keep accepting the current payment or return people to the previous payment than start a NOD. Many good people have been affected by this greed. Now what can we do to stop this. Put people in a situation where they can pay. Why should it be OK for an investor to come in and buy a home for 50 cents on the dollar and not give the homeowner who put 10% or 20% of hard earned cash down to buy the house and who has been making the payments for several years why shouldn't they have a principle reduction. Let the homeowner know that if they make the payments as agreed they will get a $100,000 principle reduction in the mortgage. The bank is going to give it to the investor anyway. They are just making a few richer and making the middle man poorer taking what little savings they have which is most of the time in thier home.

Posted by: Leslie Carretti at July 14, 2008 10:21 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker