Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Vote by Mail Has Big Implications for California Presidential Primary According to Field Poll
By Frank D. Russo
The February 5, 2008 Presidential Primary Election could see a majority of those voting doing so by mail rather than showing up at polling places on election day. The Field Poll has just released an extensive survey of over 4,500 Californians, comparing those who have signed up to receive permanent mail ballots with those who have not.
There are enormous implications here as to how campaigns will--or should--be waged, the demographics of those who are permanent VBM (Vote By Mail) registrants, challenges for the Democratic Party of this state to get the vote out because many more Republicans have taken advantage of permanent VBM than Democrats and the state's non-partisan/others who tend to lean Democratic.
This will change not only how we watch the unfolding election returns on election night and into the next day, but it will affect the timing of mail and media with voters having about four weeks to cast their ballots by mail (or dropping them off at their polling place on election day), how voters might be affected by "bounces" from Iowa and the early primaries, and probably in unforeseen ways.
Field's numbers include some startling facts as to permanent VBM voters compared with the state's overall electorate. They are skewed towards:
• A much higher percentage in the nine county San Francisco Bay Area and much lower percentage of those in Los Angeles County
• More older voters and less younger ones
• Significantly higher percentages of whites than Hispanics
• More homeowners and less renters
• More Republicans than their percentage of registration and less Democrats and decline-to state and other party voters.
• More strongly conservative Republicans and strongly liberal Democrats than their parties as a whole
Oregon has gone to a complete vote by mail process and has had the highest or among the highest turnouts in recent elections. So, if California Democrats rise to the challenge, this could bode well for a more Democratic, more progressive electorate which is generally the case with a high turnout.
The permanent VBM voters have grown every year since California law facilitated voters to choose this method in 2002--from 1.2 million Californians in November of 2002 to 4.2 million as of February of this year. February's number represents 27.2% of California's 15.5 million voters. It has undoubtedly increased since then, and given the trend and the assumption that campaigns are on their feet, should continue to rise substantially further before the primary election.
When the permanent VBM are combined with others who vote by mail (we used to call them "absentee voters") but have not requested these ballots permanently--we may very well see a majority of voters participating in this election by mail. Recent elections in California have seen a majority voting by mail and in the last statewide primary in June of 2006, 47% voted this way and only 53% voted at polling places. Take a look at Table 2 in the survey and you'll see a graphic illustration (pun intended) of this that is unmistakeable.
Ballots will start to be mailed out on January 7, 2008. This is the day before the New Hampshire primary and four days after Iowa's first caucus. If past patterns hold true, many voters will mail their's back fairly soon after receiving them, there will be a stream afterwards, and another large number mailed in the last days before the election or turned in at their polling place on election day. But many of these will be voted before a number of other significant primaries and before projections come out of the crush of other states voting on February 5.
Field also recites a number of reasons that VBM is popular and growing, including:
• Extending the "voting window" from a 13 hour period on Election Day to a 4 week period
• Allowing voters to cast their ballots and make their choices at their own pace
• Avoiding polling place lines, bad weather, and fears of going to unfamiliar places
• Providing a way to deal with ever increasing numbers of ballot propositions and to read them and consult with references and others about them
• Alleviating concerns about electronic voting as there is a paper trail of ballots used
Using VBM allows campaigns to "get their votes in the bank" before the election. It then also allows these campaigns and political parties to concentrate resources on a much smaller universe on Election Day--the stragglers who have not yet returned their VBM ballots and those who vote at the polls.
The extended voting period also should reduce the effectiveness of last minute "hit pieces." Expect to be bombarded once those ballots arrive. Just how the campaigns deal with the holidays just before then and a bit later with the Superbowl is another question.
Field reports that some county registrar of voters are encouraging VBM "as a way of reducing election costs." It should take some of the pressure off of having to assemble a large army of Election Day workers at polling places. The downside, however, is fewer polling places at greater distances for voters.
Republicans have a 41% to 40% edge over Democrats in permanent VBM statewide--within the margin of error of this survey--but showing a statistically significant difference from their share of the electorate of 34% compared with the Democrats 42%. Non-partisan /others who comprise 24% of the electorate are only 19% of the VBM group--they tend to vote more Democratic--and remember they can vote in the Democratic primary here (but not the Republican primary.
Much of the reason for this lies in Los Angeles County which is two-to-one Democratic. The numbers here are eyepopping: LA County makes up 25% of the state's vote but has only 10% of the permanent VBM voters. That 15 point gap points towards the Democrats and Democratic candidates either engaging in a ramped up efforts to get Angelenos to sign up for VBM or a lot of precinct work on Election Day to get out the vote--or both. The same is true for the Latino vote which is 8% under their level of registration in the VBM category and amongst Latino Democrats, that gap widens to 14%.
The last day to register for the primary is January 22, 2008 and absentee ballots (VBM) can be requested up to 7 days before the election--but it is best not to wait, especially in requesting a ballot if voting by mail because of delays with the mail and processing and mailing them back in or delivering them by hand so they are received before the polls close on February 5, 2008.
Comments
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 