Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Nestle Wants to Own Your Water: Time for Californians to Act

Brian-Stranko.jpg By Brian Stranko

As part of the expansion of its bottled water business worldwide, the Nestle corporation has proposed the largest-ever US water bottling plant for the pristine Mt. Shasta region of California. The proposed 1,000,000 square-foot plant would remove more than 500 million gallons (1,600 acre-feet) of Northern California’s pure, clear water each year—to the tune of 600 trips per day by large tanker trucks. The Nestle proposal also includes a 50 to 100 year water monopoly, and allows for unlimited drilling of bore holes to extract even more water.

The proposed plant would reduce water flows to the region’s rivers that support fishing and tourism, including McCloud River Falls, Squaw Valley Creek, Soda Springs, Big Springs, Muir Springs and Mud Creek, all of which are an integral part of the region’s future economic potential. The lava tube hydrology of McCloud's aquifer makes Nestlé's plan to drill bore holes high risk; such activity could leave the entire community of McCloud with a loss of wells and springs below any such hole.

A recently released economic report analyzes the long-term impact of the proposed plant in McCloud and shows that the facility is unlikely to create a significant net gain of long-term, permanent jobs for residents. The report was prepared by Eugene, Oregon-based ECONorthwest, a firm with 30 years experience specializing in economic and financial analysis of public policy, on behalf of the McCloud Watershed Council.

The report states that the proposed contract between Nestlé and the McCloud Community Services District (MCSD) creates a number of risks for the people of McCloud and Siskiyou County. An analysis of similar plants in other parts of the country shows that such facilities do not appear to be strong engines for local economic growth. The plants do create some jobs, but most of these are production positions with relatively low wages. At the same time, much of what makes a place like McCloud appealing to retirees, tourists, and entrepreneurs is likely to be lost through the location of a bottling plant in the area.

The report shows that Nestle is planning to severely under-compensate local residents for the value of their water. The current contract between the corporation and the MCSD states that Nestle will pay only $26.40 per acre-foot for McCloud’s spring water, while past studies of water transactions have found average lease rates for water in California in 2004 dollars of approximately $80 per acre-foot.

Let’s put these numbers in perspective. An acre-foot of water is equal to 326,000 gallons, which means Nestle wants to pay 1 cent per 123 gallons of water, rather than the state average of 1 cent per 40 gallons. As we all know, Nestle can re-sell the water for multiple dollars per gallon, which makes either of the above look like a remarkably bad deal.

A dedicated group of McCloud’s residents and business owners have united as the McCloud Watershed Council to urge decision-makers to reconsider the agreement that tentatively stands between Nestle and the MCSD. A recent California State appellate court ruling indicates that the MCSD may change the terms of—or even terminate--the contract once California Environmental Quality Act review has been completed.

The Nestle facility would dramatically increase traffic on local roads and could hurt fishing and other outdoor recreation, all of which would diminish McCloud’s appeal as a tourist destination. Nestle has worked hard to create the illusion that McCloud residents are desperate for the economic boost the plant would supposedly provide, but they’re not saying anything about what will be lost if the plant comes to town.

Nestle has a history of targeting remote areas for new water bottling facilities, offering a few low-paying jobs in exchange for the right to truck away the community’s most precious and vital resource. In the long term, the consequences of these raw deals will affect us all, as the fresh water resources of the globe continue to be plundered at an alarming rate. The proposed McCloud plant, the largest ever proposed in the US, represents a watershed moment. Will clean, fresh water become the property only of private corporations, or will the people of California recognize this moment as an opportunity to chart a new course?

To take action, visit these sites:

McCloud Watershed Council

The full ECONorthwest report

Brian Stranko is CEO of California Trout. Founded in 1971, California Trout was the first statewide conservation group to focus on securing protections for California’s unparalleled wild and native trout diversity. Working with local communities, business, partners and government agencies, California Trout employs conservation science, education, and advocacy to craft effective solutions for California’s water resources and fisheries. Among its many current initiatives, California Trout is now leading the effort to save the official state fish, which is the California golden trout.

Posted on November 29, 2007

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker