Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- A Clear and Present Danger: A Californian Finds Gaps in Consumer Communication from Financial Institutions
- California Wildfires and the Urgency of Combating Climate Change
- California Education Cuts in the Year After the “Year of Education”
- A Breeze of Fresh Air from Washington D.C. To California? Waxman and Dingell Battle Today--Reactions to Obama's Climate Remarks—Schwarzenegger Calls Them “Fantastic”
- Stronger Renewable Energy Goals For California: Schwarzenegger’s Executive Order and Where We Go From Here
- Dear Speaker Pelosi, Can California Have $25 Billion?
- California Democratic Party Meeting Last Weekend a Window to the Future and Areas That Need Improvement
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
California's Oil Spill Eye Opener
By Mike Young
It’s been almost a week since the Cosco Busan began spilling 58,000 gallons of oil into San Francisco Bay. As with any oil spill, the cost to the environment has been devasting with beaches all over the bay covered in oil, the bay itself highly contaminated, and hundreds of birds harmed and killed. But a week later, a bigger issue than the spill itself is how to prevent it from happening again, and one particular reason why the spill got as bad as it did was because of an arguably slow response from the Coast Guard.
And it’s not entirely their fault. One of the harsh realities is that the resources to prevent environmental disasters like the Bay Area spill have long been diminishing. Like many environmental issues have in the past decade, the problem starts on the federal level. As the LA Times reported earlier this week, the Coast Guard’s role has gradually focused away from duties involving preventing coastal degredation to filling the needs of homeland security:
"In recent years, Coast Guard staff and institutional emphasis have been shifted more toward port and coastal protection duties than marine safety and environmental response. Meanwhile, important equipment used in spill response has aged, insiders say, and training drills - routine in the years after the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska - are fewer and farther between."
The result has been less staff to respond to ecological responsibilities, less training for those staff on how to handle such situations, and ultimately a slower response time upon a crisis.
Meanwhile, the State has also found itself with insufficient resources. The problem is two-fold. First, similar to the problem with the Coast Guard key state agencies have found themselves understaffed. This issue has become the focal point of the tension between Senate pro Tem Don Perata and Governor Schwarzenegger over the oil spill. Perata’s bill SB1001 would have helped resolve some of the issues with staffing on regional water boards, but Schwarzenegger vetoed it last month.
Perata said he would reintroduce Senate Bill 1001, legislation to strengthen California’s nine regional water boards by quickening appointments and boosting their powers to reduce water pollution.
Schwarzenegger said in a veto message last month that his administration needs to study problems with the various regional water boards around the state before he acts.
While passing the bill wouldn’t have had much of an immediate effect on the Bay Area oil spill, it would have been a step in the right direction in helping to prevent future oil spills and resolve other water issues. Now the legislation must wait at least another year before it has a chance to turn into law, which mean even more time will have elapsed before serious change could occur.
The second resource problem is that the idea of needing funding for state agencies isn’t very flashy; As a result, funding requests often fall-through. The Department of Fish and Game’s Spill Prevention and Response should have been able do more for the spill, but they’ve been historically underfunded, and now find themselves receiving nearly 40% less funding than they did six years ago. While bond measures have helped compensate for the lack of funding for a given particular set of time, they have failed to supply the revenue required to cover their yearly operations and maintenance costs. But sadly, it’s not on people’s radar as an issue.
The harsh reality is that California had long been underprepared to handle a significant environmental disaster like last week’s Bay Area oil spill, but we didn’t think about it until it was too late. What we have to do now is take steps to ensure that the next disaster facing California doesn’t become one where we realized we could have prevented it if we had just done a little more.
Mike Young graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Political Science and Philosophy in 2005. Today, Mike is a staff member of the California League of Conservation Voter’s Los Angeles office and a board member of the Los Angeles League of Conservation Voters.
Comments
wow thats crazy people need o be more careful with that stuff!
Posted by: niki at November 15, 2007 01:37 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 