Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Attorney General Brown Announces Largest Predatory Lending Settlement in History: $8.68 Billion in Home Loans and Foreclosures Relief Nationally—Up to $3.5 Billion to Californians—From Countrywide Financial Corporation
- Hannah-Beth Jackson Has the Goods on Tony Strickland in Pivotal California Senate Seat Race
- Proposition 5: We Need to Fix the Drug Court System
- Turning a Red California District Blue: Is the Third Time a Charm for Ferial Masry and the Sixth Seat for Democrats to Gain Two-Thirds in the Assembly?
- The Heller Gun Decision Week 14 – The U.S. Senate Holds H.R. 6842 and California Holds SB 327
- Cavala: Competitive Legislative Seats Do Not Produce “Moderate” Lawmakers
- In California’s 5th Senate District Race Democrat Wolk Should Win
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Why is the Governor Hiding the Cost of his Plan from California Families?
By Emily Clayton
Over the last 48 hours, everyday Californians and community leaders joined together in front of the Governor’s offices around the state to discuss the Administration’s unaffordable healthcare plan and call for real, affordable reform.
Labor groups, consumer groups, health advocates, seniors, communities of faith and many others have worked extremely hard over the last year to achieve real health care reform – affordable healthcare – for Californians. Those efforts were rebuffed when the Governor vetoed AB 8.
Now, the Governor has recycled his January proposal and reintroduced a plan that poses untold costs for California families. Those costs are not just untold in the traditional political hyperbolic sense. The Governor’s plan literally does not tell people how much they’ll have to pay in order to comply with his requirement to purchase health insurance.
The reason for this is relatively simple. When you mandate people to buy insurance, you’ll have a lose-lose situation in defining what the minimum insurance is. If you define it as a high deductible health care plan, the premiums can be made somewhat affordable, but the coverage itself is meaningless without paying $5,000-$10,000 a year in deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs. If you define it as a low deductible comprehensive plan, the premium costs go off the charts. So the Governor has to choose between forcing people to buy coverage they can’t afford to use (high deductible plans) or coverage they can’t afford to buy in the first place. Either way, Californians are left holding the bag.
Instead of tackling the very real issue of affordability and quality of coverage, the Governor’s plan kicks the can down the street a bit further and pushes the hard decisions off a bit longer. Under his plan, the decision of what constitutes minimum coverage will be decided by a single state official who is accountable only to the Governor. In the mean time, Californians are asked to cross their fingers and write a blank check for future health care costs.
At the same time, everyone else seems to have their costs penciled in. Employers will pay between 0-4% of their payrolls, hospitals will pay 4%, drug companies will pay nothing. Why aren’t everyday Californians afforded this same courtesy? After all, our family budgets are a lot harder to balance at the end of the month than the bottom line of highly profitable pharmaceutical companies.
If working families are going to be required under the penalty of law to purchase health care, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to ask what the cost of that care is going to be. By giving a specific number to businesses and health care providers but leaving families in the dark, we can only presume who is really going to be bearing the brunt of unaffordable health care costs under this plan – California’s working families.
Emily Clayton is the Policy Coordinator for the California Labor Federation.
Comments
We are always the last to know- I am not in support of this so-called plan-
It is not his business to push socialized medicine on anybody- the choice should remain mine-
It infuriates me how he can make policies to direct my life- are his kids on this program? are his kids going to public school to indoctrinated?
Let me know how to fight this beast-
Posted by: lasonya at October 22, 2007 02:08 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 