- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Campaign Contributions and Healthcare Legislation in California: What the Data Shows
By Dan Newman
Healthcare is a critical issue to ordinary Californians, but it seems that voters have little say about the fate of healthcare legislation in California. At MAPLight.org, a nonpartisan watchdog group that studies the connection between money and politics, we found that California lawmakers’ votes on key healthcare bills align with their big campaign contributors alarmingly often.
We looked at seven key healthcare bills and found that, on five of them, California legislators’ votes correlated closely with the money they received from interests supporting or opposing those bills. This pattern reveals a consistent and persistent bias in our legislative system. Whether campaign donations help convince a legislator to cast votes that are favorable to a specific group, or industries fund candidates who are already sympathetic to their interests, campaign contributions are distorting public policy.
Let’s take a look at the hard data. In a report just released, MAPLight.org examined seven significant health-related bills in the California legislature during the 2005-2006 and 2007-2008 legislative sessions. In five out of the seven bills, campaign contributions from both supporters and opponents correlated with how legislators voted. For the two remaining bills, contributions from groups on one side of the bill (support or opposition) correlated with how legislators voted, while contributions from groups on the other side did not.
For example, AB 977 (2006) would have required health plans and health insurers to seek regulatory approval before selling most health care plans.
Unions, such as the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, and consumer groups supported this bill. Health plans, such as Blue Cross of California and Kaiser Permanente, were opposed. The bill passed the Assembly and died with a vote in a Senate committee, with 2 Senators voting yes, 4 voting no, and 5 not voting.
Supporters of the bill, like the unions, gave an average of $3,750 to each of the 2 Senators voting Yes. They gave much less--$478 on average--to each of the 9 Senators voting No or not voting.
Opponents of the legislation, mostly health insurance firms, gave an average of $13,951 to each of the 9 Senators voting No or not voting. They gave 14 times less--an average of $1,000--to each of the two Senators voting yes. The study used campaign contribution records from the National Institute on Money in State Politics.
This report, California Healthcare - Dollars and Politics, might justly make you cynical about our legislative system. Many of us have simply come to expect this kind of bias. Legislators listen to big-money donors, not to regular people. But why do we entrust decisions on critical issues like healthcare to a biased system?
Dan Newman is Executive Director of MAPLight.org, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization based in Berkeley, California. MAPLight.org’s website provides an unprecedented database of campaign contributions and legislative outcomes, illuminating the connection between money and politics.
Comments
Interest Groups contribute money to candidates who's philosophy embraces their concerns. Typically those candidates divide by party. That is fact.
To say that this fact proves that money drives policy is simply false - nothing is yet "proved".
A liberal Democratic lawmaker voting against insurance interestrs who accepts money and suddenly switches his voting pattern - that might be evidence
Posted by: william cavala at October 20, 2007 10:43 AM
One dollar, one vote. Our system of government may not
be representative per capita, but ad valorem it sure can't be beat. Cavala's argument basically breaks down into an honest politician is one who stays bought.
A better way to demonstrate the influence of money on
politics is to look at issues which are not addressed in our politic system and then note when they begin being addressed by our system and noting whether this correlates with money. A classic example are the Indian tribes--before they were given a (semi-)monopoly on gambling, when they went to Sacramento they were treated, well, like Indians have usually been treated in this country. After they got the monopoly, and money, they are treated with tremendous "respect."
Posted by: Random at October 20, 2007 11:43 AM
How about California lesgislators stop caving in to special interest groups who line their pockets????
Posted by: lasonya at October 21, 2007 08:22 AM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
